Background and Purpose
The Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) is used in National Cancer Institute–sponsored clinical trials as an outcome measure for sexual functioning. The tool was revised to meet the needs for a clinically useful, theory-based outcome measure for use in both research and clinical settings. This report describes the modifications and validity testing of the modified Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Male (mSAQ-Male).
Methods
This secondary analysis of data from a large Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial employed principal axis factor analytic techniques in estimating validity of the revised tool. The sample size was 686; most subjects were White, older than the age 60 years, and with a high school education and a Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score of greater than 90.
Results
A 16-item, 3-factor solution resulted from the factor analysis. The mSAQ-Male was also found to be sensitive to changes in physical sexual functioning as measured by the KPS.
Conclusion
The mSAQ-Male is a valid self-report measure of sexuality that can be used clinically to detect changes in male sexual functioning.
Introduction: A second-tier rapid response team (RRT) is activated for patients who do not respond
to first-tier measures. The premise of a tiered response is that first-tier responses by a ward team
may identify and correct early states of deterioration or establish goals of care, thereby reducing
unnecessary escalation of care to the RRT. Currently, utilisation and outcomes of tiered RRTs remain
poorly described.
Methods: A prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥18 years) who required RRT
activations was conducted from February 2018 to December 2019.
Results: There were 951 consecutive RRT activations from 869 patients and 76.0% patients had a
National Early Warning Score (NEWS) ≥5 at the time of RRT activation. The majority (79.8%) of
patients required RRT interventions that included endotracheal intubation (12.7%), point-of-care
ultrasound (17.0%), discussing goals of care (14.7%) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (24.2%).
Approximately 1 in 3 (36.6%) patients died during hospitalisation or within 30 days of RRT activation.
In multivariate analysis, age ≥65 years, NEWS ≥7, ICU admission, longer hospitalisation days at RRT
activation, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scores ≥3 (OR [odds ratio] 2.24, 95%
CI [confidence interval] 1.45–3.46), metastatic cancer (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.71–4.08) and haematological
cancer (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.84–4.19) were independently associated with mortality.
Conclusion: Critical care interventions and escalation of care are common with second-tier RRTs.
This supports the need for dedicated teams with specialised critical care services. Poor functional status,
metastatic and haematological cancer are significantly associated with mortality, independent of age,
NEWS and ICU admission. These factors should be considered during triage and goals of care discussion.
Keywords: Clinical deterioration, critical care, intensive care, mortality, rapid response system, rapid
response team
Abbreviations: (ICU) intensive care unit, (TGC) tight glucose controlKeywords: computerized decision support, nursing staff, insulin, practice guidelines, protocols, tasks, work
SYMPOSIUM
AbstractCritically ill patients require intensive nursing care. Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses, who care for these physiologically unstable patients, are continuously occupied with the integration of assessments, monitoring, and interventions that are responsive to a patient's evolving state. Since 2005, numerous evidenced-based clinical protocols have been implemented in the critical care unit. Individually, each may not appear to be burdensome but, collectively, these clinical protocols add to the cognitive work of ICU nurses. While nurses are central to the successful implementation of these protocols, little is written about the cognitive burden imposed on them by the addition of these clinical protocols. This article explores the impact of clinical protocols on the cognitive burden of ICU nurses, using a tight glucose control (TGC) protocol as an exemplar case. Research from management, ergonomics, systems engineering, and nursing is used to build the concept of cognitive burden. Future research can build upon this understanding to facilitate successful implementation of clinical protocols.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.