In studies on IOH, both the threshold to define hypotension and the method chosen to model IOH affects the association of IOH with outcome. This makes different studies on IOH less comparable and hampers clinical application of reported results.

No abstract

Estimating pre-operative mortality risk may inform clinical decision-making for peri-operative care. However, pre-operative mortality risk prediction models are rarely implemented in routine clinical practice. High predictive accuracy and clinical usability are essential for acceptance and clinical implementation. In this systematic review, we identified and appraised prediction models for 30-day postoperative mortality in noncardiac surgical cohorts. PubMed and Embase were searched up to December 2022 for studies investigating pre-operative prediction models for 30-day mortality. We assessed predictive performance in terms of discrimination and calibration. Risk of bias was evaluated using a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. To further inform potential adoption, we also assessed clinical usability for selected models. In all, 15 studies evaluating 10 prediction models were included. Discrimination ranged from a cstatistic of 0.82 (MySurgeryRisk) to 0.96 (extreme gradient boosting machine learning model). Calibration was reported in only six studies. Model performance was highest for the surgical outcome risk tool (SORT) and its external validations. Clinical usability was highest for the surgical risk pre-operative assessment system. The SORT and risk quantification index also scored high on clinical usability. We found unclear or high risk of bias in the development of all models. The SORT showed the best combination of predictive performance and clinical usability and has been externally validated in several heterogeneous cohorts. To improve clinical uptake, full integration of reliable models with sufficient face validity within the electronic health record is imperative.

Aims Identifying preoperative risk factors in older patients becomes more important to reduce adverse functional outcome. This study investigated the association between preoperative medication use and functional decline in elderly cardiac surgery patients and compared polypharmacy as a preoperative screening tool to a clinical frailty assessment. Methods This sub‐study of the Anaesthesia Geriatric Evaluation study included 518 patients aged ≥70 years undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was functional decline, defined as a worse health‐related quality of life or disability 1 year after surgery. The association between polypharmacy (i.e. ≥5 prescriptions and <10 prescriptions) or excessive polypharmacy (i.e. ≥10 prescriptions) and functional decline was investigated using multivariable Poisson regression. Discrimination, calibration and reclassification indices were used to compare preoperative screening tools for patient selection. Results Functional decline was reported in 284 patients (55%) and preoperative polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy showed higher risks (adjusted relative risk 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23–1.98 and 1.93, 95% CI 1.48–2.50, respectively). Besides cardiovascular medication, proton‐pump inhibitors and central nervous system medication were significantly associated with functional decline. Discrimination between models with polypharmacy or frailty was similar (area under the curve 0.67, 95% CI 0.61–0.72). The net reclassification index improved when including polypharmacy to the basic model (17%, 95% CI 0.06–0.27). Conclusion Polypharmacy is associated with functional decline in elderly cardiac surgery patients. A preoperative medication review is easily performed and could be used as screening tool to identify patients at risk for adverse outcome after cardiac surgery.

ImportanceCurrent fasting guidelines for procedures under anesthesia are poorly implemented, leading to negative metabolic sequelae. Recent studies in children showed support of liberal clear fluid intake; adult physiology can support clear fluid intake, but implementation studies are lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate the successfulness of implementation of a liberal clear fluid policy with regard to fasting duration, well-being, and safety in adults scheduled for anesthesia.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a quality improvement study conducted from January 2016 to July 2021 at a tertiary referral hospital in the Netherlands. Adults scheduled for nonemergency procedures under anesthesia were included in the study. Patients undergoing obstetrics procedures or those who were intubated preoperatively were excluded.InterventionsStepwise introduction of a liberal fluid fasting policy, allowing for ingestion of clear fluids until arrival at the operating room.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was change in fasting duration. Secondary outcomes were patient well-being, measured as preoperative thirst, amount of fluid ingested, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and administration of antiemetics. Safety was measured as incidence of regurgitation and aspiration (pneumonia).ResultsOf the 76 451 patients (mean [SD] age, 56 [17] years; 39 530 male individuals [52%] 36 921) included in the study, 59 036 (78%) followed the standard policy, and 16 815 (22%) followed the liberal policy. Time series analysis showed an estimated fasting duration decrease of 3:07 hours (IQR, 1:36-7:22; P &amp;lt; .001) after implementation of the liberal policy. Postimplementation median (IQR) fasting duration was 1:20 (0:48-2:24) hours. The incidence of regurgitation changed from 18 (95% CI, 14-21) to 24 (95% CI, 17-32) in 10 000 patients, and the incidence of aspiration changed from 1.7 (95% CI, 0.6-2.7) to 2.4 (95% CI, 0.5-4.7) in 10 000 patients. In the liberal policy, thirst feelings decreased (37% [4982 of 8615] vs 46% [3373 of 7362]; P &amp;lt; .001). PONV incidence decreased from 10.6% (6339 of 59 636) to 9.4% (1587 of 16 815; P &amp;lt; .001) and antiemetic administration decreased from 11.0% (6538 of 59 636) to 9.5% (1592 of 16 815; P &amp;lt; .001).Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this quality improvement study suggest that a liberal fasting policy was associated with a clinically relevant reduction in fasting duration and improved patient well-being with regard to preoperative thirst and PONV. Although a slightly higher incidence of regurgitation could not be ruled out, wider implementation of such a policy may be advocated as results are still within the clinically accepted risks margins. Results suggest that surgical procedures in patients who drink clear fluids within 2 hours before anticipated anesthesia should not be postponed or canceled.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with mortality after cardiac surgery. Novel risk factors may improve identification of patients at risk for renal injury. The authors evaluated the association between preoperative biomarkers that reflect cardiac, inflammatory, renal, and metabolic disorders and cardiac surgery–associated AKI (CSA-AKI) in elderly patients. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the 2-center prospective cohort study “Anesthesia Geriatric Evaluation.” Twelve biomarkers were determined preoperatively in 539 patients. Primary outcome was CSA-AKI. The association between biomarkers and CSA-AKI was investigated with multivariable logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcomes were 1-year mortality and patient-reported disability and were assessed with relative risks (RR) between patients with and without CSA-AKI. RESULTS: CSA-AKI occurred in 88 (16.3%) patients and was associated with increased risk of mortality (RR, 6.70 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.38–13.30]) and disability (RR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.53–2.95]). Preoperative concentrations of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hemoglobin, and magnesium had the strongest association with CSA-AKI. Identification of patients with CSA-AKI improved when a biomarker panel was used (area under the curve [AUC] 0.75 [95% CI, 0.69–0.80]) compared to when only clinical risk factors were used (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [EuroSCORE II] AUC 0.67 [95% CI, 0.62–0.73]). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative cardiac, inflammatory, renal, and metabolic biomarkers are associated with CSA-AKI and may improve identification of patients at risk.

Background: An elevated cardiac troponin level after noncardiac surgery is associated with both morbidity and mortality. Guidelines suggest routine troponin monitoring in high-risk patients. We implemented a dedicated anesthesia team to conduct follow-up on patients with postoperative troponin elevation. We hypothesized that these visits would facilitate early detection of complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative visits by dedicated anesthesiologists on early detection of complications and care utility. Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients aged ≥ 60 years with an elevated troponin within the first 3 days after noncardiac surgery. Troponin elevation was detected by routine biomarker monitoring. The primary outcome was early detected myocardial infarctions by the dedicated anesthesiologist. Other outcomes were overall detected complications, additional diagnostic tests and treatment advised by the anesthesiologist, consultation of another medical specialist, and advised postoperative follow-up at the outpatient cardiac clinic within 1 week after surgery. Results: Of the 811 patients, 509 (63%) received a postoperative consultation by the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiologists were involved in the early detection of 59% of all myocardial infarctions and in 12% of all complications. Besides cardiac ischemia, patients were also often diagnosed with noncardiac complications, including respiratory failure (8.9%), pneumonia (13.2%), and acute kidney injury (17.5%) within 1 week after surgery. In 75% of patients, anesthesiologists ordered additional diagnostics, most frequently existing of electrocardiograms and additional cardiac enzyme testing. Additionally, change in treatment was advised, most often a medication change, in 16% of patients.

No abstract