IntroductionHaemophilia A is an inherited bleeding disorder characterised by factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. In patients with non-severe haemophilia A, surgery and bleeding are the main indications for treatment with FVIII concentrate. A recent study reported that standard dosing frequently results in FVIII levels (FVIII:C) below or above FVIII target ranges, leading to respectively a bleeding risk or excessive costs. In addition, FVIII concentrate treatment carries a risk of development of neutralising antibodies. An alternative is desmopressin, which releases endogenous FVIII and von Willebrand factor. In most patients with non-severe haemophilia A, desmopressin alone is not enough to achieve FVIII target levels during surgery or bleeding. We hypothesise that combined pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided administration of desmopressin and FVIII concentrate may improve dosing accuracy and reduces FVIII concentrate consumption.Methods and analysisIn the DAVID study, 50 patients with non-severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C ≥0.01 IU/mL) with a bleeding episode or undergoing surgery will receive desmopressin and FVIII concentrate combination treatment. The necessary dose of FVIII concentrate to reach FVIII target levels after desmopressin administration will be calculated with a population PK model. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients reaching FVIII target levels during the first 72 hours after start of the combination treatment. This approach was successfully tested in one pilot patient who received perioperative combination treatment.Ethics and disseminationThe DAVID study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the Erasmus MC. Results of the study will be communicated trough publication in international scientific journals and presentation at (inter)national conferences.Trial registration numberNTR5383; Pre-results.

Background Nonsevere haemophilia A (HA) patients can be treated with desmopressin. Response of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) differs between patients and is difficult to predict. Objectives Our aims were to describe FVIII:C response after desmopressin and its reproducibility by population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling. Patients and Methods Retrospective data of 128 nonsevere HA patients (age 7–75 years) receiving an intravenous or intranasal dose of desmopressin were used. PK modelling of FVIII:C was performed by nonlinear mixed effect modelling. Reproducibility of FVIII:C response was defined as less than 25% difference in peak FVIII:C between administrations. Results A total of 623 FVIII:C measurements from 142 desmopressin administrations were available; 14 patients had received two administrations at different occasions. The FVIII:C time profile was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Interindividual variability of the estimated baseline FVIII:C, central volume of distribution and clearance were 37, 43 and 50%, respectively. The most recently measured FVIII:C (FVIII-recent) was significantly associated with FVIII:C response to desmopressin (p < 0.001). Desmopressin administration resulted in an absolute FVIII:C increase of 0.47 IU/mL (median, interquartile range: 0.32–0.65 IU/mL, n = 142). FVIII:C response was reproducible in 6 out of 14 patients receiving two desmopressin administrations. Conclusion FVIII:C response to desmopressin in nonsevere HA patients was adequately described by a population PK model. Large variability in FVIII:C response was observed, which could only partially be explained by FVIII-recent. FVIII:C response was not reproducible in a small subset of patients. Therefore, monitoring FVIII:C around surgeries or bleeding might be considered. Research is needed to study this further.

We suggest standardised desmopressin response based on clinically relevant FVIII:C levels, e.g. 0.30 and 0.50 IU/mL. In addition, patients with <0.30 IU/mL FVIII:C after 1 hour (non-responder) or ≥0.80 IU/mL (sustained responder) do not require subsequent blood sampling. However, patients with ≥0.30-0.79 IU/mL FVIII:C after 1 hour should undergo blood sampling after 6 hours to additionally determine response sustainability.

BackgroundExtracellular vesicles (EVs) are small nanometre-sized vesicles that are circulating in blood. They are released by multiple cells, including tumour cells. We hypothesized that circulating EVs contain protein kinases that may be assessed as biomarkers during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.MethodsEVs released by U87 glioma cells, H3255 and H1650 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells were profiled by tandem mass spectrometry. Total AKT/protein kinase B and extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) levels as well as their relative phosphorylation were measured by western blot in isogenic U87 cells with or without mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) and their corresponding EVs. To assess biomarker potential, plasma samples from 24 healthy volunteers and 42 patients with cancer were used.ResultsIn total, 130 different protein kinases were found to be released in EVs including multiple drug targets, such as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), AKT, ERK1/2, AXL and EGFR. Overexpression of EGFRvIII in U87 cells results in increased phosphorylation of EGFR, AKT and ERK1/2 in cells and EVs, whereas a decreased phosphorylation was noted upon treatment with the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib. EV samples derived from patients with cancer contained significantly more protein (p=0.0067) compared to healthy donors. Phosphorylation of AKT and ERK1/2 in plasma EVs from both healthy donors and patients with cancer was relatively low compared to levels in cancer cells. Preliminary analysis of total AKT and ERK1/2 levels in plasma EVs from patients with NSCLC before and after sorafenib/metformin treatment (n=12) shows a significant decrease in AKT levels among patients with a favourable treatment response (p<0.005).ConclusionPhosphorylation of protein kinases in EVs reflects their phosphorylation in tumour cells. Total AKT protein levels may allow monitoring of kinase inhibitor responses in patients with cancer.

Key Points• VWF and FVIII levels after desmopressin, which mimic hemostatic response, are associated with the bleeding phenotype of type 1 VWD patients.• Variability in VWF and FVIII response to hemostatic challenges may partly explain heterogeneity in bleeding phenotype of VWD patients.The bleeding phenotype of patients with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is very heterogeneous. We hypothesized that this heterogeneity may partly be explained by variability in response of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) levels to stress during hemostatic challenges. We therefore investigated whether VWF and FVIII levels after administration of desmopressin, which mimic in vivo hemostatic response during hemostatic challenges, explain the heterogeneity in bleeding phenotype of patients with type 1 VWD. We performed a retrospective cohort study in 122 patients with type 1 VWD. All patients received a test dose of desmopressin shortly after diagnosis. Patients' mean age was 47 6 14 years, and the mean Tosetto bleeding score was 10 6 7. Higher FVIII activity during the complete time course after desmopressin administration (1, 3, and 5-6 hours), and higher VWF and FVIII levels combined at 3 hours after desmopressin administration, were associated with a lower bleeding score: b 5 -0.9 (-1.7; 20.1) and b 5 -1.2 (-1.9; 20.5), respectively, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and comorbidities. Patients with FVIII activity in the highest quartile 3 hours after desmopressin administration had a much lower bleeding score compared with patients in the other 3 quartiles (b 5 -5.1 [-8.2; 22.0]) and also had a lower chance of an abnormal bleeding score (odds ratio 5 0.2 [0.1-0.5]), both adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities. In conclusion, VWF and FVIII levels after desmopressin administration, which mimic hemostatic response to hemostatic challenges, are associated with the bleeding phenotype of patients with type 1 VWD. This may partly explain the variability in bleeding phenotype of these patients.

Hemophilia A and hemophilia B are hereditary bleeding disorders, caused by a deficiency of clotting factor VIII or clotting factor IX, respectively. To treat and prevent bleedings, patients can administer clotting factor concentrates (hemophilia A and B) or desmopressin (hemophilia A). Both clotting factor concentrates and desmopressin are currently dosed according to the patients' body weight. However, clotting factor concentrates exhibit considerable pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. Therefore, several alternative dosing strategies to individualize dosing of clotting factor concentrates and desmopressin in hemophilia A and B have been proposed. In this study, a review of the existing literature on the individualization of dosing based on PK guidance was performed. In total, 79 articles were included. The methods to individualize dosing were divided into 3 categories: (1) methods using clinical parameters, (2) empirical individual PK-guided methods, and (3) maximum a posteriori (MAP) Bayesian estimation methods. The clinical parameter mainly used to individualize dosing is bleeding phenotype. Dosing based on bleeding phenotype may decrease clotting factor consumption. However, with this method, it is not possible to individualize on-demand dosing during bleeding events or in the perioperative setting. Empirical individual PK-guided methods can be used both for prevention and treatment of bleedings. These methods include dose individualization using a nomogram and individualized in vivo recovery. In the perioperative setting, adjustment of the rate of continuous infusion can be applied to obtain a specific target level. The final category, MAP Bayesian estimation methods, relies on the availability of a population PK model. In total, 22 population PK models describing clotting factor concentrate or desmopressin dosing are currently available in literature. MAP Bayesian estimates can be used to calculate the individualized doses required to achieve or maintain a target level in every setting. The application of PK-guided and pharmacodynamic-guided dosing of clotting factor concentrates and desmopressin seems promising, although further investigation is warranted. Prospective studies analyzing its potential benefit are on the way.

Introduction. Treatment selection tools are needed to enhance the efficacy of targeted treatment in patients with solid malignancies. Providing a readout of aberrant signaling pathways and proteolytic events, mass spectrometry-based (MS-based) peptidomics enables identification of predictive biomarkers, whereas the serum or plasma peptidome may provide easily accessible signatures associated with response to treatment. In this systematic review, we evaluate MS-based peptide profiling in blood for prompt clinical implementation. Methods. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies using a syntax based on the following hierarchy: (a) bloodbased matrix-assisted or surface-enhanced laser desorption/ ionization time-of-flight MS peptide profiling (b) in patients with solid malignancies (c) prior to initiation of any treatment modality, (d) with availability of outcome data. Results. Thirty-eight studies were eligible for review; the majority were performed in patients with non-small cell lung

Background In patients with haemophilia A (HA) perioperative dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate is based on body weight, historical FVIII level, in vivo recovery and FVIII level target values. In moderate and severe HA patients, this dosing regimen frequently leads to perioperative FVIII levels below and above target. This has not yet been evaluated in mild HA patients. Objectives To evaluate perioperative FVIII concentrate treatment in mild HA patients and to assess the frequency of FVIII levels below or above target. Patients/Methods This retrospective single‐centre study collected data from medical files of mild HA patients undergoing surgery and treated with FVIII concentrate. FVIII levels were compared to their target ranges and predictive factors for levels outside the target ranges were determined by logistic regression. Results Fifty surgeries performed in 34 patients were evaluated. Median age was 47 years and median historical FVIII level was 0.14 IU/mL. Preoperative peak FVIII level was above or below the target range in 80% and 6.7% of surgeries, respectively. Postoperatively, the percentages above and below target trough ranges were 55.8% and 12.8%. Patients with blood group 0 had the highest risk on the preoperative peak FVIII level being above target. In addition, patients who had a preoperative baseline FVIII level of >0.10 IU/mL higher than their historical FVIII level had a higher preoperative peak FVIII level than patients without this increase. Conclusions Dosing above FVIII target ranges with FVIII concentrates occurs frequently during perioperative treatment of mild HA patients. These results underline the necessity for better patient‐tailored treatment.