Pelvic fractures comprise a small number of annual Level I pediatric trauma center admissions. This is a review of the University of Chicago Level I Pediatric Trauma Center experience with pediatric pelvic fractures. This is a retrospective review of the University of Chicago Level I Pediatric Trauma Center experience with pediatric pelvic fractures during the 12-year period from 1992 to 2004. From 1992 to 2004, there were 2850 pediatric trauma admissions. Thirteen patients were identified with pelvic fractures; seven were boys and six were girls. The average age was 8 years old. The mechanism of injury in all cases was motor vehicle related; 11 patients (87%) sustained pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes. According to the Torode and Zeig classification system, type III fractures occurred in eight patients (62%) and type IV fractures occurred in six patients (31%). Associated injuries occurred in eight patients (62%). Seven of these patients (88%) had associated injuries involving two or more organ systems. Of the associated injuries, additional orthopedic injuries were the most common, occurring in 62 per cent of our patients. Neurological injuries occurred in 54 per cent of patients, vascular injuries in 39 per cent, pulmonary injuries in 31 per cent, and genitourinary injuries in 15 per cent. Five patients (38%) were treated operatively; only two patients underwent operative management directly related to their pelvic fracture. The remaining three patients underwent operative management of associated injuries. The mortality rate was 0 per cent. Although pelvic fractures are an uncommon injury in pediatric trauma patients, the morbidity associated with these injuries can be profound. The majority of pelvic fractures in children are treated nonoperatively, however, more than one-half of these patients have concomitant injuries requiring operative management. When evaluating and treating pediatric pelvic fractures, a systematic multidisciplinary approach must be taken to evaluate and prioritize the pelvic fracture and the associated injuries.
Craniosynostosis is a significant disorder affecting 1 in 2500 live births worldwide. Although a large body of work has focused on dural regulation and the contributions of molecular mediators such as fibroblast growth factor, bone morphogenetic protein, and transforming growth factor β, minimal attention has been directed toward osteoclast function in cranial suture biology. Receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANK) is an essential mediator of osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast activation. In this study, physiologic fusion of posterior frontal sutures in murine development correlated with decreasing protein expression of RANK in comparison to age-matched coronal and sagittal sutures via immunohistochemical survey. However, RANK mRNA did not exhibit a similar pattern suggesting that RANK is regulated at the protein level. Fused cranial sutures in nonsyndromic craniosynostotic children also showed decreased levels of RANK staining in immunohistochemistry in comparison to patent sutures from the same patients. Immunohistochemistry with a RANK ligand antibody did not show differences in fused or patent sutures. Moreover, RANK knockdown in calvarial strip suture cultures displayed increased bone density specifically in the suture line after infection with small interfering RANK viruses. Cranial suture biology, similar to bone biology in general, likely depends on a complex interplay between osteoblasts and osteoclasts. We now report a temporospatial correlation between RANK expression and suture morphology that suggests that osteoclast activity is important in maintenance of cranial suture patency in normal physiology and disease. Furthermore, RANK downregulation promoted suture fusion establishing a causal relationship between the presence of RANK and patency.
The addition of a documentation template to multidisciplinary breast cancer conferences resulted in increased recorded adherence rates to national guidelines. This template provided a means of both accurate and efficient documentation of evidence-based practice, which represents a concept with broad application in quality improvement. Although evaluation of the project was not continued beyond the pilot stage, current quality measure scores remain within the same range.
The Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LYMPHA) procedure entails performing a lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection to reduce lymphedema risk. The two most common fluorophores utilized in LVB are blue dye and indocyanine green. We developed a novel application of fluorescein isothiocyanate for intraoperative lymphatic mapping. Our goal is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of fluorescein isothiocyanate for this application. We reviewed a prospectively collected database on breast cancer patients who underwent LYMPHA from March to September 2015. Fluorescein isothiocyanate was used to identify arm lymphatic channels after axillary lymph node dissection to perform an LVB between disrupted lymphatics and axillary vein tributaries. Data on preoperative and intraoperative variables were analyzed. Thirteen patients underwent LYMPHA with intraoperative fluorescein isothiocyanate lymphatic mapping from March to September 2015. Average patient age was 50 years with a mean body mass index of 28. On average, 3.4 lacerated lymphatic channels were identified at an average distance of 2.72 cm (range, 0.25-5 cm) caudal to the axillary vein. On average, 1.7 channels were bypassed per patient. Eleven anastomoses were performed to the accessory branch of the axillary vein and 1 to a lateral branch. In 1 patient, a bypass was not performed due to poor lymphatic caliber and inadequate length of the harvested vein tributary. No intraoperative adverse events were noted. Fluorescein isothiocyanate is a safe and effective method for intra-operative lymphatic mapping. Fluorescein isothiocyanate imaging allows for simultaneous dissection and lymphatic visualization, making it an ideal agent for lymphatic mapping and dissection in open surgical fields, such as in the LYMPHA procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.