The Extension of Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) project is a novel educational intervention designed in New Mexico to transfer subspecialty knowledge about hepatitis C virus (HCV) to primary care providers, thereby increasing patient access to HCV care. The ECHO model has been shown to deliver educational benefits and to result in good treatment outcomes for HCV-infected individuals in the USA; however, this approach has not been assessed in a European setting.We sought to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and implementation of the ECHO model in Ireland using a pilot study. We present a descriptive review of recruitment, participation, retention and cost of the intervention as well as a qualitative review of the views of participants on the barriers, benefits and acceptability of the ECHO model. In the original Project ECHO in New Mexico, geographical distance posed the greatest barrier to accessing HCV care. In Ireland, people who inject drugs (PWID) were identified by interviewees as the main group facing barriers to accessing specialist HCV care. State-employed doctors and nurses caring for large numbers of HCV-infected PWID in opiate substitution treatment centres and homeless hostels were successfully recruited to participate in the project. Self-employed general practitioners did not participate, due mainly to a lack of time and the absence of reimbursement for participation. Practitioners who participated in the pilot reported benefits to themselves and their patients and would like to continue to participate in similar multidisciplinary, multisite educational interventions in the future.
Undiagnosed institutionalised patients were reviewed in an attempt to identify those with Angelman syndrome (AS). The aim was to test these patients for deletion of chromosome 15(q11-13) and to describe the adult phenotype. The selection criteria included severe intellectual disability, ataxic or hypermotoric limb movements, lack of speech, a "happy" demeanour, epilepsy, and facial appearance consistent with the diagnosis. Patients were examined, medical records perused, and patients' doctors contacted as required. Genetic tests performed included routine cytogenetics, DNA methylation analysis (with probe PW71B), and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (with probes D15S10, GABRbeta3, or SNRPN). A deletion in the AS region was detected in 11 patients (9 males and 2 females) of 22 tested. The mean age at last review (March 1996) was 31.5 years (range 24 to 36 years). Clinical assessment documented findings of large mouth and jaw with deep set eyes, and microcephaly in nine patients (two having a large head size for height). No patient was hypopigmented; 1/11 patients was fair. Outbursts of laughter occurred in all patients but infrequently in 7/11 (64%) and a constant happy demeanour was present in 5/11 (46%). All had epilepsy, with improvement in 5/11 (46%), no change in 4 (36%), and deterioration in 2 (18%). The EEG was abnormal in 10/10 patients. Ocular abnormalities were reported in 3/8 patients (37.5%) and 4/11 (36%) had developed kyphosis. Two had never walked. All nine who walked were ataxic with an awkward, clumsy, heavy, and/or lilting gait. No patient had a single word of speech but one patient could use sign language for two needs (food and drink). Our data support the concept that AS resulting from deletion is a severe neurological syndrome in adulthood. The diagnosis in adults may not be straightforward as some manifestations change with age. Kyphosis and keratoconus are two problems of older patients.
An extensive set of chromosome 15 DNA polymorphisms and densitometric analysis with four markers mapping to the Prader-Willi chromosome region (PWCR) of chromosome 15 have been used to characterize a cohort of 30 subjects with classical Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Molecular analysis enabled the classification of the PWS subjects into four groups: (A) 18 subjects (60%) had deletions of paternal 15q11-13 involving a common set of DNA markers. Two subjects had differently sized deletions, one larger and one smaller than the other cases. (B) Eight (27%) had maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 15. (C) One (3%) had a marker chromosome carrying an extra copy of the PWCR. The marker chromosome was demonstrated to be of paternal origin and the two intact chromosomes were maternally derived. This case represents an apparent exception to the generally held view that PWS is associated with an absence of paternally inherited gene(s) located in the PWCR. (D) The remaining three cases (10%) had none of the above abnormalities. This last subgroup of patients has not previously been well characterized but could represent limited deletions not detectable with the markers used or abnormalities in the imprinting process. These cases represent potentially valuable resources to elucidate more precisely the fundamental disorders responsible for PWS.
Laboratory-based reports of the cytogenetic abnormalities detected during the course of testing for deletion del(22q) are scant. We report our findings from the testing with FISH of 462 patients suspected to have del(22q) between 1994 and 2000. Of these, 447 had a normal karyotype. An apparently unrelated cytogenetic abnormality was detected in 15 (3.2%). Two of these abnormalities involved reciprocal translocation with chromosome 22q and one of these showed del(22q) with FISH. The other abnormalities included sex chromosome aneuploidies and unbalanced rearrangements of various chromosomal segments. There was no commonality among these abnormalities and no correlation with other reported cases. Among those with a normal karyotype, an unexpected deletion of the control arylsulphatase A (ARSA) probe was found, providing a definite frequency of 1/262 for ARSA deletions among patients suspected to have del(22q). Of the 462 referrals, 48 (10%) had one or more additional diagnoses, and in this group, 4 (8%) had del(22q) and 2 (4%) had an apparently unrelated cytogenetic abnormality. The data highlight the importance of initial cytogenetic analysis in patients suspected of del(22q) and negates the use of interphase FISH screening by itself for del(22q). The finding of 3.2% unrelated cytogenetic abnormalities is noteworthy. FISH should be used in any structural rearrangement to ascertain if the relevant locus is deleted or not. The continued reporting of patients diagnosed with del(22q) found to have an unrelated cytogenetic abnormality will expand the phenotypic spectrum and possible gene mapping may refine phenotypic specificity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.