Abstract. Though early stages of yeast conjugation are well-mimicked by treatment with pheromones, the final degradation of the cell wall and membrane fusion of mating that leads to cytoplasmic mixing may require separate signals. Mutations that blocked cell fusion during mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae were identified in a multipartite screen. The three tightest mutations proved to be partial-function alleles of the ABC-transporter gene STE6 required for transport of a-factor. The ste6(cefl-1) allele was recovered and sequenced. The ste6(cefl-1) allele contained a stop codon predicted to truncate Ste6 at amino acid residue 862 (of 1290).The ste6(cef) mutations reduced, but did not eliminate, expression of a-factor. Light and electron microscopy revealed that unlike ste6 null mutations which block mating before the formation of mating pairs, the ste6(cef) (cell fusion) alleles permitted early steps in mating to proceed normally but blocked at a late stage in conjugation where mating partners were encased by a single cell wall and separated by only a thin layer of cell wall material we term the fusion wall. Morphologically the prezygotes appeared symmetrical with successful cell wall fusion at the periphery of the region of cell contact. Responses to a-factor were efficiently induced in partner cells under mating conditions as expected given the symmetric appearance of the prezygotes. A strain expressing a ste6(KlO93A) mutation that conferred export of a twofold to fourfold higher level of a-factor than ste6(cef) did not accumulate prezygotes during mating which could indicate a tight threshold of a-factor signaling required for mating.However, mating to an sst2 partner which has a greatly increased sensitivity to a-factor did not suppress the fusion defect of a ste6(cef) strain. Overexpression of the structural gene for a-factor also did not suppress the fusion defect. It is possible that a-factor or STE6 play more complex roles in cell fusion.y EAST cells of a and c~ mating type produce and respond to mating pheromones during the initiation of mating processes that lead to cell-to-cell fusion (reviewed in references 25,28,40). Pheromone treatment of non-mating cells leads to cell cycle arrest but not to the cell lysis that might be expected with loss of cell wall or membrane integrity (20) suggesting that the end stages of cell fusion may require special signals. Though the process of pheromone response in yeast leading to cell cycle arrest and gene expression has been well-characterized, the details of the cell fusion event remain obscure. The FUS1 and FUS2 genes play distinct but as yet undefined roles in this process (29,43). The FUS3 gene encodes a MAP kinase that plays a central role in control of transcriptional and cell cycle aspects of pheromone response. The specific role of FUS3 in cell fusion is unclear (9). Yeast sterols also play a role in cell fusion. Ergosterol is specifically required for high-efficiency fusion during mating (42). Additional fus genes have been described but not characterized...

Cell fusion during yeast mating provides a model for signaling-controlled changes at the cell surface. We identified the AXL1 gene in a screen for genes required for cell fusion in both mating types during mating. AXL1 is a pheromone-inducible gene required for axial bud site selection in haploid yeast and for proteolytic maturation of a-factor. Two other bud site selection genes, RSR1, encoding a small GTPase, and BUD3, were also required for efficient cell fusion. Based on double mutant analysis, AXL1 in a MATα strain acted genetically in the same pathway with FUS2, a fusion-dedicated gene. Electron microscopy of axl1, rsr1, and fus2 prezygotes revealed similar defects in nuclear migration, vesicle accumulation, cell wall degradation, and membrane fusion during cell fusion. The axl1 and rsr1 mutants exhibited defects in pheromone-induced morphogenesis. AXL1 protease function was required in MATα strains for fusion during mating. The ability of the Rsr1p GTPase to cycle was required for efficient cell fusion, as it is for bud site selection. During conjugation, vegetative functions may be redeployed under the control of pheromone signaling for mating purposes. Since Rsr1p has been reported to physically associate with Cdc24p and Bem1p components of the pheromone response pathway, we suggest that the bud site selection genes Rsr1p and Axl1p may act to mediate pheromone control of Fus2p-based fusion events during mating.