Restructuring health care in Canada has emphasized the provision of ambulatory and home-based palliative care. Acquiring economic evidence is critical given this trend and its tremendous demands on family caregivers. The purposes of this study were: 1) to comprehensively assess the societal costs of home-based palliative care; and 2) to examine the socio-demographic and clinical factors that account for variations in costs over the course of the palliative trajectory. One hundred and thirty-six family caregivers were interviewed every two weeks from time of palliative referral until death. Information regarding appointments, travel and out-of-pocket expenses, time devoted to caregiving, as well as demographic and clinical characteristics were measured. The mean monthly cost of care per patient was $24,549 (2008 CDN$). Family caregivers' time costs comprised most costs (70%). Multivariable linear regression indicated that costs were greater for patients who: had lower physical functioning (p < 0.001); lived with someone (p = 0.007); and when the patients approached death (p = 0.021). Information highlighting the variation in costs across individuals may aid policy makers and mangers in deciding how to allocate resources. Greater clarity regarding costs over the course of the palliative trajectory may improve access to care.
Introduction: Health system restructuring combined with the preferences of many terminally ill care recipients and their caregivers has led to an increase in home-based palliative care, yet many care recipients die within institutional settings such as hospitals. This study sought to determine the place of death and its predictors among palliative care patients with cancer. Methods: Study participants were re cruited from the Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, a regional palliative care program based in Toronto, Canada. A total of 137 patients and their family caregivers participated in the study; application of various exclusion criteria restricted analysis to a sub-sample of 110. Bivariate (chi-square) and multivariate (logistic regression) analyses were conducted. Results: 66 percent of participants died at home. Chisquare analysis indicated that women were more likely to die at home than men; multivariate analysis indicated that women and those living with others were significantly more likely to die at home than men or those who lived alone. Conclusion: Place of death is influenced by the socio-demographic characteristics of patients, the characteristics of their caregivers, and health service factors. Palliative care programs need to tailor services to men and those living alone in order to reduce institutional deaths.
A BA ISCC screening programme targeting families of newborns is feasible in Canada. Passive distribution of ISCC at maternity is potentially effective and highly cost-effective.
A considerable degree of overlap exists between reimbursement and regulatory approval of health technologies, and harmonization of certain aspects is both possible and feasible. Various models to harmonization have been suggested in which a number of practical attempts have been drawn from. Based on a review of the literature, approaches can be categorized into those focused on reducing uncertainty and developing economies of scale in the evidentiary requirements; and/or aligning timeframes and logistical aspects of the review process. These strategies can further be classified based on the expected level of structural and organizational change required to implement them into the existing processes. Passive processes require less modification, whereas active processes are associated with greater restructuring. Attempts so far at harmonization have raised numerous legal and practical issues and these must be considered when introducing a more harmonized framework into the existing regulatory and reimbursement arrangements.
The screening program has high specificity and distribution with low cost. Successful program case identification had earlier age at KP. Program modifications aim to improve sensitivity. Longer-term studies will determine program impact on health outcomes.
BackgroundPublic drug plans are faced with increasingly difficult funding decisions. In Canada, the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) makes funding recommendations to the provincial and territorial drug plans responsible for cancer drugs. Assessments of the economic models submitted by pharmaceutical manufacturers are publicly reported.ObjectivesThe main objective of this research was to identify recurring methodological issues in economic models submitted to pCODR for funding reviews. The secondary objective was to explore whether there exists any observed relationships between reported methodological issues and funding recommendations made by pCODR’s expert review committee.MethodsPublicly available Economic Guidance Reports from July 2011 (inception) until June 2014 for drug reviews with a final funding recommendation (N = 34) were independently examined by two authors. Major methodological issues from each review were abstracted and grouped into nine main categories. Each issue was also categorized based on perception of the reviewer’s actions to manage it.ResultsThe most commonly reported issues involved costing (59% of reviews), time horizon (56%), and model structure (36%). Several types of issues were identified that usually could not be resolved, such as quality of clinical data or uncertainty with indirect comparisons. Issues with costing or choice of utility estimates could usually be addressed or explored by reviewers. No statistically significant relationship was found between any methodological issue and funding recommendations from the expert review committee.ConclusionsThe findings provide insights that can be used by parties who submit or review economic evidence for continuous improvement and consistency in economic modeling, reporting, and decision making.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41669-017-0018-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.