due to the discovery of their role in intra-cellular communications, exosomes, which carry information specific to the cell of origin, have garnered considerable attention in cancer research. Moreover, there is evidence to suggest the possibility of isolating different exosome sub-populations based on target antigens at the cell surface. Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph +) chronic myeloid leukemia (cML) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasia characterized by the breakpoint cluster region-proto-oncogene 1 tyrosine-protein kinase (BcR-ABL1) fusion-gene, derived from the t (9;22) translocation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) target BcR-ABL1 protein and induce major or deep molecular responses in the majority of patients. despite the fact that several studies have demonstrated the persistence of leukemic cells in the bone marrow niche, even following treatment, TKIs prolong patient survival time and facilitate treatment-free remission. These characteristics render cML a plausible model for investigating the feasibility of tumor-derived exosome fraction enrichment. In the present study, patients in the chronic phase (cP) of CML were treated with TKIs, and the quantification of the BCR-ABL1 exosomal transcript was performed using digital PcR (dPcR). The possibility of tumor-derived exosomes enrichment was confirmed, and for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, the detection of the BcR-ABL1 transcript highlighted the presence of active leukemic cells in patients with CP-CML. According to these findings, tumor-derived exosomes may be considered a novel tool for the identification of active leukemic cells, and for the assessment of innovative monitoring focused on the biological functions of exosomes in cML.

CMV represents one of the most serious life-threatening complications of allogeneic stem cell transplantaion (allo-SCT). Pre-emptive treatment is highly effective, but toxicity and repetitive reactivation of CMV represent a major challenge in the clinical practice. The use of anti-CMV specific immunoglobulins (Megalotect) is controversial. We retrospectively collected data on 92 patients submitted to allo-SCT for hematological malignancies, in whom Megalotect was used either for prophylaxis (n=14) or with pre-emptive therapy (n=78). All the patients were considered at high-risk of developing CMV reactivation and CMV disease. The treatment was well tolerated, with no reported infusion reactions, nor other adverse events. None of the 14 cases treated with Megalotect as prophylaxis developed CMV reactivation. 51/78 (65%) patients who received Megalotect during pre-emptive treatment achieved complete clearance of CMV viremia, and 14/51 patients (29%) developed a breakthroug CMV infection. 7/78 patients (9%) developed CMV disease. The projected 1-year OS, 1-year TRM and 1-year RR is 74%, 15% and 19%, respectively. No differences were observed in terms of OS, TRM and RR by comparing patients who achieved a complete response after treatment versus those who did not.. These retrospective data suggest that Megalotect is safe and well tolerated. When used as prophylaxis, no CMV reactivation was recorded. We have no conclusive data regarding its efficacy in reducing the cumulative dose of anti-CMV specific drugs in the pre-emptive setting. Further prospective trials are warrented to identify the best setting of patients who can benefit from Megalotect alone or in addition to anti-CMV specific drugs.

Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is the gold standard to quantify the BCR-ABL1 transcript for molecular response monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, and it plays a pivotal role in clinical decision-making process, even if it presents technical limits. Increasing data suggest that digital PCR (dPCR) is more accurate and reliable than RT-qPCR in CML minimal residual disease monitoring and in patients’ selection for treatment discontinuation. But what about the identification of treatment discontinuation failures? We present the case of a CML patient enrolled both in a study aiming to comparatively assess molecular response by RT-qPCR and dPCR and in the progressive arm of the OPTkIMA trial. This is a phase III trial including CML patients randomized to receive a fixed versus a progressive intermittent tyrosine kinase inhibitor regimen. At 24 months, because of two consecutive detections of MR^2.0 by RT-qPCR, the patient resumed daily treatment. Conversely, dPCR revealed a stability of molecular response and even a slight decreasing of transcript over time. An additional specimen was sampled one month after the first MR^2.0 detection because of clinical decision: RT-qPCR resulted MR^3.0 and dPCR confirmed the transcript’s stability. Nowadays, the resumption of therapy is RT-qPCR-driven despite its limits in detection and robustness. In this case, according to dPCR, the patient could have continued intermittent treatment and the stability of response was then confirmed by RT-qPCR. So, dPCR could be able to better identify peculiar clinical response to therapy.

No abstract