No abstract

Robust gear designs consider not _nly crack initiation, but crack propagation trajectoriesfor a fail-safe design. In actual gear operation, the magnitude as well as tt e posit;on of the force charges as the gear rotates through the mesh. A study [o determine the effect of moving gear tooth load on crack propagation predictions was performed. Twodimensional almlysis of an involute spur gear and three-dimensional analysis of a spira!: _._ b_vel pinion gear using the finite element method and boundary element method were studied and compared to experiments. A modified theory for predicting gear crack propagation paths based on the" criteria of Erdogan and Sih [I8] was investigated.Crack simulation based on calculated stress intensity factors and mixed mode crack angle prediction techniques using a simple static analysis in which tlle tooth load was located at the highest point of single tooth contact was validated. For three-dimensional analysis, however, the cmalysis was valid only as long _s the crack did rot approach the contact region on the tooth.

Robust gear designs consider not only crack initiation, but crack propagation trajectories for a fail-safe design. In actual gear operation, the magnitude as well as the position of the force changes as the gear rotates through the mesh. A study to determine the effect of moving gear tooth load on crack propagation predictions was performed. Two-dimensional analysis of an involute spur gear and three-dimensional analysis of a spiral-bevel pinion gear using the finite element method and boundary element method were studied and compared to experiments. A modified theory for predicting gear crack propagation paths based on the criteria of Erdogan and Sih was investigated. Crack simulation based on calculated stress intensity factors and mixed mode crack angle prediction techniques using a simple static analysis in which the tooth load was located at the highest point of single tooth contact was validated. For three-dimensional analysis, however, the analysis was valid only as long as the crack did not approach the contact region on the tooth.