Objective-The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate possible differences in insulin sensitivity, food intake, and cravings between the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS).Methods-Subjects were screened for PMS using the Penn Daily Symptom Rating (DSR) scale. Each subject had two overnight admissions (once in each cycle phase) to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. They performed 3-day diet histories prior to each hospitalization. After admission, subjects received dinner and a snack, then were fasted until morning, when they underwent a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). Insulin sensitivity was determined by Minimal Model analysis. Blinded analysis of diet histories and inpatient food intake was performed by a registered dietitian.Results-There was no difference found in insulin sensitivity between cycle phases (n = 7). There were also no differences in proportions of macronutrients or total kilocalories by cycle phase, despite a marked difference in food cravings between cycle phase, with increased food cravings noted in the luteal phase (p = 0.002). Total DSR symptom scores decreased from a mean of 186 (± 29.0) in the luteal phase to 16.6 (± 14.2) in the follicular phase. Women in this study consumed relatively high proportions of carbohydrates (55%-64%) in both cycle phases measured.Conclusions-These findings reinforce the suggestion that although the symptom complaints of PMS are primarily confined to the luteal phase, the neuroendocrine background for this disorder may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases.
The purpose of this study was to examine, through a randomized, controlled trial, the effects of a maternal carbohydrate-restricted diet on maternal and infant outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Women diagnosed with GDM were randomly allocated into one of two groups: an intervention group that was placed on a lower-carbohydrate diet (35–40% of total calories) or a control group that was placed on the usual pregnancy diet (50–55% carbohydrate). A convenience sample of participants diagnosed with GDM (ages 18–45 years) was recruited from two different sites: one urban and low-income and the other suburban and more affluent. Individual face-to-face diet instruction occurred with certified diabetes educators at both sites. Participants tested their blood glucose four times daily. Specific socioeconomic status indicators included enrollment in the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children or Medicaid-funded health insurance, as well as cross-sectional census data. All analyses were based on an intention to treat. Although there were no differences found between the lower-carbohydrate and usual-care diets in terms of blood glucose or maternal-infant outcomes, there were significant differences noted between the two sites. There was a lower mean postprandial blood glucose (100.59 ± 7.3 mg/dL) at the suburban site compared to the urban site (116.3 ± 15 mg/dL) (P <0.01), even though there was no difference in carbohydrate intake. There were increased amounts of protein and fat consumed at the suburban site (P <0.01), as well as lower infant complications (P <0.01). Further research is needed to determine whether these disparities in outcomes were the result of macronutrient proportions or environmental conditions.
PurposeThe standard of care in Locally-Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (LA-NSCLC) is chemotherapy and radiation; however, Radiation-Induced Lung Injury (RILI), which may be prevented by the anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties of Flaxseed (FS), impedes its maximum benefit.Materials and MethodsPatients with LA-NSCLC requiring definitive RT were randomized to one FS or control muffin daily from start to 2 weeks after RT. Blood and urine were collected to quantify plasma FS metabolites, Enterodione (ED) and Enterolactone (EL), and urinary oxidative stress biomarkers, 8, 12-iso-iPF2a-VI (isoprostane) and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dGuo). Tolerability was defined as consuming ≥ 75% of the intended muffins and no ≥ grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicities.ResultsFourteen patients (control,7; FS,7) were enrolled. The tolerability rates were 42.9 versus 71.4% (p=0.59) for FS and control, respectively. Mean percentages of intended number of muffins consumed were 37% versus 73% (p=0.12). ED and EL increased at onset of FS and decreased with discontinuation, confirming bioavailability. Isoprostane and 8-oxo-dGuo were detectable. There was a trend towards decreased rates of pneumonitis in FS.ConclusionsThis is the first study to report FS bioavailability and quantify oxidative stress markers in NSCLC patients. FS in the administered muffin formulation did not meet tolerability criteria. Given the promising mechanism of FS as a radioprotectant, further investigations should focus on the optimal method for administration of FS.
1177 Poster Board I-199 BACKGROUND: High dose melphalan followed by an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (ASCT) is standard initial therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). However, toxicity and efficacy of this treatment are variable, with the sources of variability being poorly understood. We hypothesized that obesity and renal insufficiency modulate the pharmacokinetics of melphalan and therefore impact treatment toxicity. METHODS: We evaluated 39 patients with MM undergoing high-dose melphalan followed by ASCT. Patients received melphalan on day -2 at a dose of 200 mg/m2 (one patient with poor renal function received 180 mg/m2) and ASCT on day 0. We assessed body composition using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and renal function using 24 hour urine creatinine clearance. We assessed toxicity on day +7 using the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), a physician evaluated measurement of erythema and ulceration (on a scale of 0-5, with higher scores indicating worse mucositis). We also assessed patient reported symptom scores for mouth and throat soreness using the Mucositis Daily Questionnaire (MDQ) periodically during the first month (on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores indicating worse soreness). RESULTS: The median age was 55 years (range 37-70). 59% were male. The median weight was 83 kg (48-128), with median percentage body fat as measured by DEXA of 31% (range 15–53), and the median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 105 ml/min (range 28-194). Results from univariate and multivariate analyses are shown in the table below. In univariate analyses, we observed a weak and statistically insignificant direct correlation between percent body fat and toxicity (as measured by OMAS score or peak soreness), and a weak and statistically significant indirect correlation between GFR and OMAS score. In a multi-variable linear regression model including percent body fat, weight, GFR, and actual melphalan dose, we observed a correlation between OMAS score and percent body fat, with an increase in body fat percentage of 0.10 associated with a 0.65 unit increase in OMAS score (p=0.01). In a similar multi-variable model, we observed a correlation between MDQ soreness score and percent body fat, with an increase in body fat percentage of 0.10 associated with a 2.07 increase in MDQ soreness score (p=0.05). CONCLUSION: More obese patients, as measured by percent body fat, have more severe oral mucositis after high dose melphalan, independent of melphalan dose, weight, and renal function. We are measuring melphalan pharmacokinetics in this group of patients, and further research should help guide rational chemotherapy dosing for this highly effective treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.