Parasitoids of the Encarsia genus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) are important biological control agents against whiteflies. Some of the species in this genus not only parasitize their hosts, but also kill them through host feeding. The whitefly parasitoid, Encarsia formosa Gahan, was examined to determine whether the rearing host species affects its subsequent host-feeding capacity and parasitism. E. formosa wasps were reared on Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) ‘Q’, and their subsequent host-feeding capacity and parasitism of T. vaporariorum and B. tabaci were examined. E. formosa reared on T. vaporariorum were significantly larger in body size than those reared on B. tabaci , but these wasps killed a similar number of whitefly nymphs by host feeding when they attacked the same host species on which they were reared. Regardless of the species on which it was reared, E. formosa fed significantly more on the B. tabaci nymphs than on the T. vaporariorum nymphs. The number of whitefly nymphs parasitized by E. formosa differed between the wasps reared on T. vaporariorum and those reared on B. tabaci depending on which whitefly species was offered as a host. In addition, the wasps reared on T. vaporariorum parasitized significantly more on T. vaporariorum than those reared on B. tabaci . The wasps reared on B. tabaci , however, parasitized similar numbers of whiteflies of both host species. The results indicated that the host-feeding capacity of E. formosa was affected more by the host species attacked than by the rearing host species, but the parasitism was affected by the host species attacked and the rearing host species. Generally, E. formosa reared on T. vaporariorum killed more T. vaporariorum nymphs by parasitism and host feeding than those reared on B. tabaci. Additionally, a similar number of B. tabaci nymphs were killed by parasitism and host feeding regardless of the rearing host species. Currently coexistence of B. tabaci and T. vaporariorum on vegetable crops usually occurs in some areas; our results may provide helpful information on using mass-reared parasitoids against mixed whitefly infestations in biological control programs.

Purpose The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and imaging parameters of kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to evaluate whether patients undergoing KA-TKA benefited more than those undergoing MA-TKA. Methods Studies comparing the efficacy of KA-TKA and MA-TKA were included after searching and screening in the database, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Database Library. A total of 1420 patients were enrolled in the study, with 736 MA-TKA and 738 KA-TKA. The primary outcomes were postoperative knee function scores including KSS series, WOMAC, KOOS and OKS. Secondary outcomes included the operative time, the length of hospital stay, knee extension/flexion angle, and some imaging parameters. The risk of bias for included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborative risk-of-bias assessment tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS). Results Sixteen studies were included in this meta-analysis (11 randomized controlled studies and 5 cohort studies). Primary outcomes: Knee Society score (KSS, MD = 8.36, 95% Cl: 0.83–15.90) and combined KSS (MD = 15.24, 95% CI: 5.41–25.07) were higher in KA-TKA than in MA-TKA, and other functional scores were not statistically significant in KA-TKA and MA-TKA, including knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), Oxford knee score (OKS), Knee Function score (KFS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes: KA-TKA resulted in smaller medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) compared to MA-TKA. For other outcome measures, KA-TKA showed similar results compared to MA-TKA, including hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, extension/flexion angle, tibial component slope angle, joint line orientation angle (JLOA), the operation time, the length of hospital stay and ligament release rate. Conclusions In our analysis results, patients undergoing KA-TKA benefit as much as patients undergoing MA-TKA. KA may be a viable reference in total knee replacement.

No abstract