Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has rapidly developed into a pandemic. Increased levels of ferritin due to cytokine storm and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis were found in severe COVID‐19 patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the role of ferritin in COVID‐19. Methods Studies investigating ferritin in COVID‐19 were collected from PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, SinoMed, and WANFANG. A meta‐analysis was performed to compare the ferritin level between different patient groups: non‐survivors versus survivors; more severe versus less severe; with comorbidity versus without comorbidity; ICU versus non‐ICU; with mechanical ventilation versus without mechanical ventilation. Results A total of 52 records involving 10 614 COVID‐19‐confirmed patients between December 25, 2019, and June 1, 2020, were included in this meta‐analysis, and 18 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. The ferritin level was significantly increased in severe patients compared with the level in non‐severe patients [WMD 397.77 (95% CI 306.51‐489.02), P < .001]. Non‐survivors had a significantly higher ferritin level compared with the one in survivors [WMD 677.17 (95% CI 391.01‐963.33), P < .001]. Patients with one or more comorbidities including diabetes, thrombotic complication, and cancer had significantly higher levels of ferritin than those without (P < .01). Severe acute liver injury was significantly associated with high levels of ferritin, and its level was associated with intensive supportive care, including ICU transfer and mechanical ventilation. Conclusions Ferritin was associated with poor prognosis and could predict the worsening of COVID‐19 patients.
The prognostic role of hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients is ambiguous. D-dimer, may be regarded as a global marker of hemostasis activation in COVID-19. Our study was to assess the predictive value of D-dimer for the severity, mortality and incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in COVID-19 patients. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched. The pooled diagnostic value (95% confidence interval [CI]) of D-dimer was evaluated with a bivariate mixed-effects binary regression modeling framework. Sensitivity analysis and meta regression were used to determine heterogeneity and test robustness. A Spearman rank correlation tested threshold effect caused by different cut offs and units in D-dimer reports. The pooled sensitivity of the prognostic performance of D-dimer for the severity, mortality and VTE in COVID-19 were 77% (95% CI: 73%-80%), 75% (95% CI: 65%-82%) and 90% (95% CI: 90%-90%) respectively, and the specificity were 71% (95% CI: 64%-77%), 83% (95% CI: 77%-87%) and 60% (95% CI: 60%-60%). D-dimer can predict severe and fatal cases of COVID-19 with moderate accuracy. It also shows high sensitivity but relatively low specificity for detecting COVID-19-related VTE events, indicating that it can be used to screen for patients with VTE.
A comprehensive analysis of the humoral immune response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is essential in understanding COVID-19 pathogenesis and developing antibody-based diagnostics and therapy. In this work, we performed a longitudinal analysis of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 proteins in 104 serum samples from 49 critical COVID-19 patients using a peptide-based SARS-CoV-2 proteome microarray. Our data show that the binding epitopes of IgM and IgG antibodies differ across SARS-CoV-2 proteins and even within the same protein. Moreover, most IgM and IgG epitopes are located within nonstructural proteins (nsps), which are critical in inactivating the host’s innate immune response and enabling SARS-CoV-2 replication, transcription, and polyprotein processing. IgM antibodies are associated with a good prognosis and target nsp3 and nsp5 proteases, whereas IgG antibodies are associated with high mortality and target structural proteins (Nucleocapsid, Spike, ORF3a). The epitopes targeted by antibodies in patients with a high mortality rate were further validated using an independent serum cohort (n = 56) and using global correlation mapping analysis with the clinical variables that are associated with COVID-19 severity. Our data provide fundamental insight into humoral immunity during SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 immunogenic epitopes identified in this work could also help direct antibody-based COVID-19 treatment and triage patients.
BackgroundTaxane‐based chemotherapy is widely used in lung cancer. ABCB1 have a role in the prediction of treatment response and toxicity of chemotherapy in solid tumors. In this retrospective study, we investigated ABCB1 polymorphism on response and toxicity in taxane‐based chemotherapy in lung cancer patients.MethodsA total of 122 lung cancer patients who received taxane‐based chemotherapy were included in this study. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used for ABCB1 polymorphism detection. Turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0.ResultsThe frequency of the ABCB1 2677 site TT/TG/GG genotype was 32.8%, 43.4% and 23.8%, respectively and the frequency of the 3435 sites the TT/TC/CC genotype was 13.9%, 44.3% and 41.8%, respectively. The occurrence of neurotoxicity was higher in patients who had ABCB1 3435 site mutation (TT 88.2%, TC 22.2%, CC 21.6% P = 0.004). There was no significant difference between ABCB1 genotypes with regard to other chemotherapy‐induced toxicity. For non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, those harboring ABCB1 2677 and 3435 site wild‐type patients had longer median progression‐free survival (PFS) in the paclitaxel subgroup (3435 site: TT 3.87 vs. TC 9.50 vs. CC 14.13 months; P < 0.001; 2677 site: TT 4.37 vs. TG 9.73 vs. GG 12.1 months; P = 0.013). The area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) of 20 patients treated with docetaxel increased for ABCB1 mutation subgroups.ConclusionABCB1 mutation is associated with higher neurotoxicity of taxane‐based chemotherapy. It also predicts shorter PFS for NSCLC in paclitaxel‐based treatment.
BackgroundAutoimmune diseases (ADs) are characterized by immune-mediated tissue damage, in which angiogenesis is a prominent pathogenic mechanism. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an angiogenesis modulator, is significantly elevated in several ADs including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We determined whether circulating VEGF levels were associated with ADs based on pooled evidence.MethodsThe analyses included 165 studies from the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases and fulfilled the study criteria. Comparisons of circulating VEGF levels between patients with ADs and healthy controls were performed by determining pooled standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in a random-effect model using STATA 16.0. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine heterogeneity and to test robustness.ResultsCompared with healthy subjects, circulating VEGF levels were significantly higher in patients with SLE (SMD 0.84, 95% CI 0.25–1.44, P = 0.0056), RA (SMD 1.48, 95% CI 0.82–2.15, P <0.0001), SSc (SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.75, P <0.0001), Behcet’s disease (SMD 1.65, 95% CI 0.88–2.41, P <0.0001), Kawasaki disease (SMD 2.41, 95% CI 0.10–4.72, P = 0.0406), ankylosing spondylitis (SMD 0.78, 95% CI 0.23–1.33, P = 0.0052), inflammatory bowel disease (SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.43–0.71, P <0.0001), psoriasis (SMD 0.98, 95% CI 0.62–1.34, P <0.0001), and Graves’ disease (SMD 0.69, 95% CI 0.20–1.19, P = 0.0056). Circulating VEGF levels correlated with disease activity and hematological parameters in ADs.ConclusionCirculating VEGF levels were associated with ADs and could predict disease manifestations, severity and activity in patients with ADs.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, identifier CRD42021227843.
ObjectivesSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is an uncommon autoimmune disease that varies with ethnicity. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the GTFSI, NFKB1, and TYK2 genes have been reported to be associated with SSc in other populations and in individuals with various autoimmune diseases. This study aimed to investigate the association between these SNPs and susceptibility to SSc in a Chinese Han population.MethodA case-control study was performed in 343 patients with SSc and 694 ethnically matched healthy controls. SNPs in GTF2I, NFKB1, and TYK2 were genotyped using a Sequenom MassArray iPLEX system. Association analyses were performed using PLINK v1.90 software.ResultOur study demonstrated that the GTF2I rs117026326 T allele and the GTF2I rs73366469 C allele were strongly associated with patients with SSc (P = 6.97E-10 and P = 1.33E-08, respectively). Patients carrying the GTF2I rs117026326 TT genotype and the GTF2I rs73366469 CC genotype had a strongly increased risk of SSc (P = 6.25E-09 and P = 1.67E-08, respectively), and those carrying the NFKB1 rs1599961 AA genotype had a suggestively significantly increased risk of SSc (P = 0.014). Moreover, rs117026326 and rs73366469 were associated with SSc in different genetic models (additive model, dominant model, and recessive model) (P < 0.05) whereas rs1599961 was associated with SSc in the dominant genetic model but not in the addictive and recessive models (P = 0.0026). TYK2 rs2304256 was not significantly associated with SSc in this study.ConclusionGTF2I rs117026326 and rs73366469 SNPs were strongly associated with SSc in this Chinese Han population. NFKB1 rs1599961 showed a suggestive association with SSc, and no significant association was found between TYK2 rs2304256 and SSc in this Chinese Han population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.