A majority of lower extremities neuro-ischaemic wounds (NIU) are related to:(a) only diabetes (DM); (b) only peripheral artery disease (PAD); (c) co-existing diabetes and peripheral artery disease (DM-PAD). This study aims to characterise the major clinical outcomes of forementioned three groups of lower extremity wound patients in Singapore. Patients hospitalised for lower extremity NIU between January 2014 and October 2017 in a tertiary hospital in Singapore were analysed. Patients' major limb amputation and mortality were assessed using Cox regression models. Cumulative survival and amputationfree survival among the three classified groups were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Compared with patients with only DM, those in the PAD group and the DM-PAD group had higher risk of major limb amputation (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.65-3.70; adjusted hazard ratio: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.53-2.65 respectively) and mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.57-3.55; adjusted hazard ratio: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.86-3.26 respectively). The 3-year survival and amputation-free survival were lowest in the DM-PAD group (52.1% and 41.5% respectively), followed by the PAD group (53.3% and 44.6% respectively) and the DM group (74.2% and 68.5% respectively). Lower extremity NIU patients with PAD or DM-PAD were found to have poorer clinical prognosis than those with DM only.

Introduction: Dialysis nurses play a paramount role in vascular access (VA) management. The aim of this study is to evaluate dialysis nurses’ knowledge, attitude, practice and self-efficacy (KACP-SE) pertaining to VA cannulation and evaluation. Method: An anonymous self-administered survey was administered to dialysis nurses from two tertiary hospitals (four dialysis units) and two community dialysis centres from April to May 2022. The 37-items survey consists of four dimensions of questions relating to VA cannulation and management: knowledge, attitude, practice and self-efficacy. The content validity and face validity of the survey was reviewed by three experienced VA professionals and five dialysis nurses respectively. The internal consistency and construct validity of the survey have been assessed with psychometric tests. Results: There were 23 and 47 nurses, working in the participated community and tertiary hospital dialysis centres respectively, responded to the survey. The internal consistency coefficients indicated acceptable reliability of the instrument (KR-20 coefficient was 0.55 and 0.76 for knowledge and practice domains; Cronbach’s α was 0.85 and 0.64 for self-efficacy and attitude domains). In the exploratory factor analysis for attitude and self-efficacy, the instrument could account for 64.0% and 53.0% of the total variance respectively. In the knowledge domain, five out of eight single-select multiple-choice questions were correctly answered by >70% of the participants. Overall, the mean (±SD) of participants’ total self-efficacy score was 24.3 (±3.1) over total score of 30. The majority of the participants (82.4%) either agreed or strongly agreed that ultrasound guidance is useful for cannulation. Conclusion: This KAP-SE instrument can be used to evaluate knowledge, attitude, practice and self-efficacy of dialysis nurses toward VA management. The participants demonstrated acceptable knowledge level, but with some knowledge gaps identified. It also revealed nurses’ good self-efficacy level and welcoming attitude towards adopting ultrasound in VA cannulation among the participants.

Healthcare costs arising from venous leg ulcers (VLU) are expected to increase due to an aging population and increased prevalence of comorbidities. We aim to estimate the healthcare resources incurred by VLU patients, and to quantify the extent to which predictors explain variation in cost-related outcomes. Retrospective patient-level cohort data for VLU patients were analysed using generalised linear regression models. Data were extracted from a tertiary hospital registry in Singapore, between 2013 and 2017. The outcome variables were length of stay per admission; inpatient and outpatient bill per admission; whether a patient underwent a surgical treatment of the venous system; and, whether they visited the emergency department. Cost outcomes were reported in Singapore dollars (S$). A total of 162 VLU patients were included with a mean age of 67.5 (±14.4). For the inpatient setting the mean length of stay was 8.1 days and the mean inpatient bill was S$7886. For outpatients, the mean number of dressings was 29.4, and mean outpatient bill was S$6962. Heart disease patients incurred longer hospital stays and larger inpatient bills per admission and females had greater odds of undergoing a surgical procedure on the venous system. Certain VLU patient groups were found to be associated with larger cost outcomes.chronic leg ulcer, chronic wound, economic burden, venous leg ulcer Key Messages• this study provides insights into the use of healthcare resources by patients with venous leg ulcers (VLU) • the cost of outpatient care was lower than inpatient care. An average VLU patient's outpatient bill was 12% less than the inpatient bill even though outpatient dressing sessions were 90% higher than inpatient dressing sessions • patients with a medical history of ischemic heart disease or cardiomyopathy were associated with higher cost-related outcomes such as longer length of stay and larger inpatient bill per admission