Background: As the first domestic PD-1 antibody approved for lung cancer in China, camrelizumab has exhibited proven effectiveness for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the cost-effectiveness of this new regimen remains to be investigated.Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab combination therapy vs. chemotherapy for previously untreated patients with advanced, non-squamous NSCLC without Alk or Egfr genomic aberrations from the perspective of China's healthcare system.Methods: Based on the CameL trial, the study developed a three-health state Markov model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding camrelizumab to chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in NSCLC patients. The analysis models were conducted for patients unselected by PD-L1 tumor expression (the base case) and the patient subgroup with PD-L1-expressing tumors (≥1%). Primary model outcomes included the costs in US dollars and health outcomes in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as well as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $31,500 per QALY. Additionally, a scenario analysis that adjusted within-trial crossover was employed to evaluate camrelizumab combination therapy compared to chemotherapy without subsequent use of PD1/PD-L1 antibodies.Results: Camrelizumab combination therapy was more costly and provided additional 0.11 QALYs over chemotherapy in the base case analysis (0.86 vs. 0.75 QALYs), 0.12 QALYs over chemotherapy in the subgroup analysis (0.99 vs. 0.88 QALYs), and 0.34 QALYs over chemotherapy in the scenario analysis (0.86 vs. 0.52 QALYs). Correspondingly, the ICER was $63,080 per QALY, $46,311 per QALY, and $30,591 per QALY, in the base case, the subgroup, and the scenario analysis, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that ICERs of the base case and the subgroup analysis were most sensitive to the cost of camrelizumab, the cost of pemetrexed. Besides, the base case and subgroup analysis were more sensitive to the risk of neutrophil count decreased in the camrelizumab and the utility of stable disease, respectively.Conclusion: Although camrelizumab combination therapy is not cost-effective as first-line therapy for NSCLC patients in China in the base case, adjusting within-trial crossover would move the treatment regimen toward cost-effectiveness in the scenario analysis.
Background: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis has high catheterization skill requirements and that early complications. The optimal catheter placement method remains debatable in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis patients. Safe and effective peritoneal dialysis catheterization is needed in clinical work.
Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the data of 34 patients diagnosed with end-stage renal disease who opt for peritoneal dialysis, 19 males and 15 females, with an average age of 62.3±14.7 years, peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation was completed by the improved percutaneous catheterization technique. They were followed for 6 months, early and late complications were observed and the survival rate of the catheter technique was calculated.Results: All 34 patients diagnosed with end-stage renal disease successfully underwent catheter placement using the improved percutaneous technique; the catheterization success rate was 100%. No severe organ injuries, such as intestinal perforation and bladder perforation, occurred intraoperatively. Peritoneal dialysis was started immediately after surgery. The early complications included one case of leakage, one case of omental wrapping, and six cases of rectus abdominis hemorrhage. The late complications included one case of pleuro-abdominal fistula and two cases of peritonitis. The 6-month technical survival rate for the catheter was 94.1% (32/34). Compared to previously reported studies, this technique may reduce leakage and early catheter dysfunction, and improve the technical survival of catheters.
Conclusions:The improved percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter placement technique might be an effective and safe method for urgent-start peritoneal dialysis patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.