similar with respect to the preference rates for life-sustaining treatments compared with palliative care (46.9% vs 34.4% in the 60% survival group and 50.0% vs 40.6% in the 30% survival group; odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.31-2.63). A few patients were not able to formulate a preference (6 patients (18.8%) in the 60% survival group and 3 patients (9.4%) in the 30% survival group; OR, 0.423; 95% CI, 0.08-2.10). An analysis of the patients who formulated a preference showed that an attitude that mere survival is at least as important as quality of life was associated with a preference for life-sustaining treatments (OR, 10.28; 95% CI, 2.94-35.90). Increasing maternal age (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98) and childlessness (OR, 0.12; 95% CI 0.01-0.98) were associated with a preference for palliative care. Most patients would decide together with their partners (63 of 64 [98.4%]) and preferred to be empowered by their physicians in the decision-making process (48 of 64 [75%]). Discussion | In this study, it appeared that treatment preferences originated from individual characteristics and values rather than from reasoning about numerical outcome estimates. However, generalizability is limited and the results should be interpreted in light of the methods used. Patients made a one-time decision without personal feedback and patients actually affected might indicate different preferences. More studies are needed to help to improve our understanding of the information that parents facing extremely preterm birth want and need.
Background Global assessment of antimicrobial agents prescribed to infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may inform antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Methods We conducted a one-day global point prevalence study of all antimicrobials provided to NICU infants. Demographic, clinical, and microbiologic data were obtained including NICU level, census, birth weight, gestational/chronologic age, diagnoses, antimicrobial therapy (reason for use; length of therapy), antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), and 30-day in-hospital mortality. Findings On July 1, 2019, 26% of infants (580/2,265; range, 0–100%; median gestational age, 33 weeks; median birth weight, 1800 g) in 84 NICUs (51, high-income; 33, low-to-middle income) from 29 countries (14, high-income; 15, low-to-middle income) in five continents received ≥1 antimicrobial agent (92%, antibacterial; 19%, antifungal; 4%, antiviral). The most common reasons for antibiotic therapy were “rule-out” sepsis (32%) and “culture-negative” sepsis (16%) with ampicillin (40%), gentamicin (35%), amikacin (19%), vancomycin (15%), and meropenem (9%) used most frequently. For definitive treatment of presumed/confirmed infection, vancomycin (26%), amikacin (20%), and meropenem (16%) were the most prescribed agents. Length of therapy for culture-positive and “culture-negative” infections was 12 days (median; IQR, 8–14) and 7 days (median; IQR, 5–10), respectively. Mortality was 6% (42%, infection-related). An NICU ASP was associated with lower rate of antibiotic utilization ( p = 0·02). Interpretation Global NICU antibiotic use was frequent and prolonged regardless of culture results. NICU-specific ASPs were associated with lower antibiotic utilization rates, suggesting the need for their implementation worldwide. Funding Merck & Co.; The Ohio State University College of Medicine Barnes Medical Student Research Scholarship
Background: Lung ultrasound (LUS) and lung ultrasound score (LUSS) have been successfully used to diagnose neonatal pneumonia, assess the lesion distribution, and quantify the aeration loss. The present study design determines the diagnostic value of LUSS in the semi-quantitative assessment of pneumonia in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) neonates.Methods: Eleven COVID-19 neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 infection and 11 age-and gender-matched controls were retrospectively studied. LUSS was acquired by assessing the lesions and aeration loss in 12 lung regions per subject.Results: Most of the COVID-19 newborns presented with mild and atypical symptoms, mainly involving respiratory and digestive systems. In the COVID-19 group, a total of 132 regions of the lung were examined, 83 regions (62.8%) of which were detected abnormalities by LUS. Compared with controls, COVID-19 neonates showed sparse or confluent B-lines (83 regions), disappearing A-lines (83 regions), abnormal pleural lines (29 regions), and subpleural consolidations (2 regions). The LUSS was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group. In total, 49 regions (37%) were normal, 73 regions (55%) scored 1, and 10 regions (8%) scored 2 by LUSS. All the lesions were bilateral, with multiple regions involved. The majority of the lesions were located in the bilateral inferior and posterior regions. LUS detected abnormalities in three COVID-19 neonates with normal radiological performance. The intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility of LUSS was excellent.Conclusions: LUS is a noninvasive, convenient, and sensitive method to assess neonatal COVID-19 pneumonia, and can be used as an alternative to the use of diagnostic radiography. LUSS provides valuable semi-quantitative information on the lesion distribution and severity.
Maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3), a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) has been dysregulated in various tumors. However, the expression level and functional role of MEG3 in the progression of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection remains to be elucidated. The present study quantified the expression level of MEG3 in the nasopharyngeal (NPA) samples of RSV‑infected patients and in BEAS‑2B cells infected with RSV. The findings of the present study demonstrated that the expression level of lncRNA MEG3 was reduced in the NPA samples of RSV‑infected patients and in BEAS‑2B cells infected with RSV. In vitro transfection revealed increased mRNA expression levels of toll‑like receptor 4 (TLR4), tumor necrosis factor‑α (TNFα) and interleukin (IL)‑8 following RSV infection in BEAS‑2B cells. Additionally, ectopic expression of MEG3 reduced the expression level of TLR4, subsequently suppressing the mRNA expression levels of TNFα and IL‑8, indicating the protective role of MEG3 in the process of RSV infection. It is of note, that RSV infection‑induced p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor‑κB (NF‑κB) activation was partly abolished by overexpression of MEG3. In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, the present study provided the first evidence that lncRNA MEG3 expression level was reduced in the NPA samples of patients with RSV infection and RSV‑infected cells. Additionally, it was demonstrated that MEG3 protected human airway epithelial cells from RSV infection, primarily by suppressing TLR4‑dependent p38 MAPK and NF‑κB signaling.
We used the lung ultrasound score (LUSS) to analyze the ultrasound images and assess the lesions and aeration loss in 12 lung regions of 11 COVID-19 neonates born to mother with COVID-19 and 11 age-and gender-matched controls. In the COVID-19 group, 132 regions were reviewed and 83 regions (62.8%) detected abnormalities. Compared with controls, COVID-19 neonates showed more increased B-lines (83 regions), abnormal A-lines (83 regions), abnormal pleural line (29 regions) and subpleural consolidation (5 regions). among which 49 regions (37%) were normal, 73 regions (55%) scored 1, and 10 regions (8%) scored 2. The LUSS was significantly higher in COVID-19 group. All the lesions were bilateral, multiple regions involved, and mainly located in bilateral lower lobes and right middle lobe. The intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility of LUSS were excellent. Lung ultrasound is a noninvasive and convenient method for the assessment of neonatal COVID-19 pneumonia and presents typical signs. LUSS provides valuable semi-quantitative information about the lesion distribution and severity.
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an emerging disease. The consequences of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in infants remain unknown. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 have adverse brain development. Methods This multicenter observational study was conducted at two designated maternal and children’s hospitals in Hubei Province, mainland China from February 1, 2020 to May 15, 2020. Neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 were enrolled. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and volumes of grey and white matters, and physical growth parameters were observed at 44 weeks corrected gestational age. Results Of 72 neonates born to mothers with COVID-19, 8 (11%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, 8 (11%) were critically ill, and no deaths were reported. Among the eight neonates that underwent brain MRI at corrected gestational age of 44 weeks, five neonates were diagnosed with COVID-19. Among these five neonates, three presented abnormal MRI findings including abnormal signal in white matter and delayed myelination in newborn 2, delayed myelination and brain dysplasia in newborn 3, and abnormal signal in the bilateral periventricular in newborn 5. The other three neonates without COVID-19 presented no significantly changes of brain MRI findings and the volumes of grey matter and white matter compared to those of healthy newborns at the equivalent age ( P > 0.05). Physical growth parameters for weight, length, and head circumference at gestational age of 44 weeks were all above the 3rd percentile for all neonates. Conclusions Some of the neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 had abnormal brain MRI findings but these neonates did not appear to have poor physical growth. These findings may provide the information on the follow-up schedule on the neonates exposed to SARS-CoV-2, but further study is required to evaluate the association between the abnormal MRI findings and the exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12519-021-00426-z.
Background During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, due to the traffic blockade and the shortage of medical resources, more and more premature infants could not receive timely and effective ROP screening, which delayed treatment and even caused children blindness. Therefore, how to carry out ROP screening safely and effectively during the epidemic was very important and urgent. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of ROP screening assisted by telemedicine network during COVID-19 outbreak. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at Wuhan Children’s hospital in Wuhan, China, from January to October, 2020. The measures which were performed to make the ROP screening more safe and effective were summarized and the comparison between ROP screening assisted by telemedicine network in 2020 and usual screening in 2019 were analyzed. Results A total of 267 outpatient infants completed ROP screening. The median gestational age was 32 weeks (30w to 34w) and the median birth weight was 1780 g (1460 g to 2100 g). Meanwhile, 149 (55.8%) out of 267 infants were males. During January to May in 2020, 86 screening appointments were received, among which 67 (77.9%) were from telemedicine platform online. The completing percentage of total online ROP appointments was higher than that of total face-to-face appointments (58.1% VS 22. 1%, P = 0.018). As for the number of infants screened between 2020 and 2019 from Februaryto October, 54 infants completed ROP screening in 2020, which was higher than that (51participants) in 2019 on September. Furthermore, compared with the usual screening in 2019, ROP screening assisted by telemedicine network in 2020 had smaller gestational age (32w VS 33w, p<0.001) and lower birth weight (1780 g VS 1900 g, p = 0.001). However, of the 267 infants screened, 18(6.7%) had ROP while the percentage of ROP screened in 2019 was the same (44[6.7%]). During follow-up, none of medical staffs was infected and no adverse reaction was reported. Conclusions The screening for retinopathy of prematurity assisted by telemedicine network was safe and feasible during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preventive measures before and after screening were very necessary, which could effectively avoid cross infection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.