Cervical spondylosis (CS)-related neck pain is difficult to treat because of its degenerative nature. The aim of this 9-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of optimized acupuncture for CS-related neck pain. Participants who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to optimized, shallow, and sham acupuncture groups (1:1:1). The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire score at week 4. Participants were followed up until week 16. Of the 896 randomized participants, 857 received ≥1 intervention session; 280, 286, and 291 received optimized, shallow, and sham acupuncture, respectively. A total of 835 (93.2%) participants completed the study. At week 4, significant differences (P < 0.001) were observed in the changes in Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire scores between the optimized acupuncture group and both the shallow {7.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.57-9.86)} and sham acupuncture (10.38 [95% CI, 8.25-12.52]) groups. The difference in the scores at week 16 between the optimized acupuncture group and the shallow (8.84 [95% CI, 6.34-11.34]) and sham acupuncture (10.81 [95% CI, 8.32-13.30]) groups were significant. The center effect indicated wide variability in the treatment effects (Cohen's d = 0.01-2.19). Most SF-36 scores were higher in the optimized acupuncture group than those in the other groups. These results suggest that 4-week optimized acupuncture treatment alleviates CS-related neck pain and improves the quality of life, with the effects persisting for minimum 3 months. Therefore, acupuncture can have positive effects on CS-related neck pain, although the effect size may vary widely.

AIMTo obtain a reference range of morphological indices and establish a formula to accurately predict standard liver volume (SLV) in Chinese adults.METHODSComputed tomography (CT)-estimated total liver volume (CTLV) was determined in 369 Chinese adults. Age, sex, body weight, body height, body mass index, and body surface area (BSA) were recorded using CT. Total splenic volume, portal venous diameter (PVD), splenic venous diameter (SVD), and portal venous cross-sectional area (PVCSA) were also measured by CT. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of each parameter on CTLV and to develop a new SLV formula. The accuracy of the new formula was compared with the existing formulas in a validation group.RESULTSThe average CTLV was 1205.41 ± 257.53 cm3 (range, 593.80-2250.10 cm3). The average of PVD, SVD and PVCSA was 9.34 ± 1.51 mm, 7.40 ± 1.31 mm and 173.22 ± 48.11 mm2, respectively. The CT-estimated splenic volume of healthy adults varied markedly (range, 46.60-2892.30 cm3). Sex, age, body height, body weight, body mass index, and BSA were significantly correlated with CTLV. BSA showed the strongest correlation (r = 0.546, P < 0.001), and was used to establish a new model for calculating SLV: SLV (cm3) = 758.259 × BSA (m2)-124.272 (R2 = 0.299, P < 0.001). This formula also predicted CTLV more accurately than the existing formulas, but overestimated CTLV in elderly subjects > 70 years of age, and underestimated liver volume when CTLV was > 1800 cm3.CONCLUSIONOur new BSA-based formula is more accurate than other formulas in estimating SLV in Chinese adults.

Background and Aims: Rifaximin is effective in preventing and treating hepatic encephalopathy (HE). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of different dosages of rifaximin in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with covert HE (CHE). Methods: In this single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label study, CHE was diagnosed using a combination of the psychometric HE score and the EncephalApp Stroop test. Cirrhotic patients with CHE were recruited and randomly assigned to low-dose rifaximin 800 mg/day, highdose rifaximin (1,200 mg/day), and control groups, and were treated for 8 weeks. The sickness impact profile (SIP) scale was used to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients. Forty patients were included in the study, 12 were assigned to the low-dose group, 14 to the high-dose group, and 14 patients to the control group. Results: The percentage of patients with CHE reversal was significantly higher in both the low-dose (41.67%, 5/12) and high-dose (57.14%, 8/14) groups than in the control group (7.14%, 1/14) at 8 weeks (p=0.037 and p=0.005, respectively). In addition, both doses of rifaximin resulted in significant improvement of the total SIP score compared with the control group. There were no significant differences in the CHE reversal rate, total SIP score improvement, and incidence of adverse event between the low-dose and highdose groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: Low-dose rifaximin reverses CHE and improves HRQOL in cirrhotic patients with comparable effects and safety to high-dose rifaximin.