Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has gained popularity, which has contributed to a decrease in the number of open procedures. Hence a growing concern regarding the ability of laparoscopically trained surgeons to perform open surgery (e.g. due to bleeding complications) has been raised. The aim of the study was to investigate the ability of conversion to open surgery following exclusively robotic or laparoscopic training. Methods: Thirty-six medical students were randomized into three groups: Open surgery, laparoscopy, and robot-assisted laparoscopy. All underwent intensive simulation training in the allocated surgical modality. Subsequently, all study subjects performed an open bowel anastomosis in a pig model where anastomoses were tested for resistance to pressure and leak as a surrogate marker of surgical quality. Results: The primary endpoint was the surgical quality of an open surgery model assessed as, leak pressure, which was 80.01 ± 36.16 mmHg in the laparoscopic training group, 106.57 ± 23.03 mmHg in the robotic training group, and 133.65 ± 18.32 mmHg in the open surgery training group (mean, SD). We found that there were no significant differences between the open surgery training group and the robotic training group whereas a significant difference was found when comparing laparoscopic and open surgery training groups in favor of open procedure training (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In a surrogate open surgery model based on bowel anastomosis, we found that skills acquired through practice on robotic simulation platforms were not significantly worse when compared to skills acquired through training in open surgery, whereas skills acquired from laparoscopic training were significantly poorer when compared to open surgery practice.
Globally non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a high-incidence disease. There is a large heterogeneity within NMIBC regarding recurrence-and progression risks, and large-scale studies of treatment patterns and prognoses in an everyday setting could result in NMIBC-subgroup treatment optimization, benefiting both patients and the economy. The Danish national registries provide such an opportunity if the registered procedure codes are valid. Therefore, the aim of the study was to validate the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10) codes of NMIBC treatment used in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Patients and Methods: From the DNPR, we randomly selected 200 NMIBC treatment courses identified by the dates of the course and the codes of transurethral resection of the bladder ((TURB), n = 125), photodynamic diagnosis ((PDD), n = 25), bladder instillation with Bacillus Calmette vaccine ((BCG), n = 25), or bladder instillation with chemotherapy/Mitomycin C ((MMC), n = 25). We used medical record reviews as the reference standard and estimated positive predictive values (PPVs) of all procedure codes and negative predictive values (NPVs) of PDD-and the perioperative single-shot MMC codes. Results: We identified the medical records in 150 (75%) of the 200 treatment courses (149 individual patients).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.