Background Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder in which the use of immunotherapy and the long-term outcome have not been defined. Methods In this multi-institutional observational study (2007-2012), all patients with GluN1 antibodies were assessed at symptom onset and 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Treatment included first-line immunotherapy (steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis), second-line immunotherapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide), and tumor removal. Predictors of outcome were determined at the Universities of Pennsylvania and Barcelona using generalized linear mixed models with binary distribution. Results 577 patients (1-85 years, median 21) were studied, 212 were children (<18 years). Treatment effects and outcome were assessable in 501 (median follow-up 24 months): 472 (94%) underwent first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, resulting in improvement within four weeks in 251 (53%). Of 221 patients who failed first-line therapy, 125 (57%) received second-line immunotherapy resulting in better outcome than those who did not (OR 2·69, CI 1·24-5·80, p=0·012). During the first 24 months, 394/501 reached good outcome (mRS 0-2; median 6 months), and 30 died. At 24 month follow-up 204/252 (81%) had good outcome. Outcomes continued to improve for up to 18 months after symptom onset. Predictors of good outcome were early treatment (OR 0·62, CI 0·50-0·76, p<0·0001) and lack of ICU admission (OR 0.12, CI 0·06-0·22,p<0·0001). 45 patients had one or multiple relapses (representing a 12% risk within 2 years); 46/69 (67%) relapses were milder than previous episodes (p<0·0001). In 177 children, predictors of good outcome and the magnitude of effect of second-line immunotherapy were comparable to those of the entire cohort. Conclusions Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis respond to immunotherapy. Second-line immunotherapy is usually effective when first-line therapies fail. Recovery can take more than 18 months.

Summary Background We aimed to assess the sensitivity/specificity of serum and CSF antibody-testing in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, and the correlation between titers, relapses, outcome, and epitope repertoire. Methods In this observational study, brain immunohistochemistry and cell-based assays (CBA) with fixed and live NMDAR-expressing cells were used to determine the sensitivity/specificity of antibody-testing in paired serum/CSF obtained at diagnosis of 250 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and 100 control subjects. A patient was considered antibody-positive if either serum or CSF tested positive with both immunohistochemistry and CBA; titers were determined with serial sample dilution using brain immunohistochemistry. Samples from 45 patients (25 good-outcome: modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2; 10 poor-outcome: mRS 3–6; 10 relapses) were examined at ≥3 disease time points. Epitope repertoire was determined with CBA expressing GluN1-NMDAR mutants Findings All 250 patients had NMDAR-antibodies in CSF but only 214/250 had antibodies in serum (sensitivity 100% [98.5–100%] versus 85.6% [80.7–89.4%], p<0.0001). Serum immunohistochemistry-testing was more often in agreement with CBA with fixed than live cells (77/108 versus 63/108, p=0.0056). In multivariable analysis, CSF and serum titers were higher in patients with poor-outcome than in those with good-outcome (CSF dilution 340 versus 129, difference 211, [95%-CI 1.1–421], p=0.049; serum 7370 versus 1243, difference 6127 [2369–9885], p=0.0025), and in patients with teratoma than in those without (CSF 395 versus 110, difference 285 [134–437], p=0.0079; serum 5515 versus 1644, difference 3870 [548–7193], p=0.024). Over time there was a decrease of antibody-titers regardless of outcome (from diagnosis to last follow-up: CSF 614 to 76, difference 538 [288–788]; serum 5460 to 1564, difference 3896 [2428–5362], both p<0.0001). Relapses correlated better with the titer-change in CSF than that in serum (14/19 versus 7/16, p=0.037). After recovery, 24/28 CSF and 17/23 serum from patients remained antibody-positive. Patients’ antibodies targeted a main epitope region at GluN1 aa369; the epitope repertoire did not differ between patients with different outcomes, and did not change during relapses. Interpretation NMDAR antibody-testing is more sensitive in CSF than serum. Antibody-titers in CSF and serum are higher in patients with poor-outcome or teratoma. The titer-change in CSF correlates better with relapses than that of serum. Funding The Dutch Cancer Society, the National Institute of Health, the McKnight Neuroscience of Brain Disorders award, the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Erasmus MC fellowship and Fundació la Marató de TV3.

Summary Background Increasing evidence suggests that seizures and status epilepticus can be immune-mediated. We aimed to describe the clinical features of a new epileptic disorder, and to establish the target antigen and the effects of patients’ antibodies on neuronal cultures. Methods In this observational study, we selected serum and CSF samples for antigen characterisation from 140 patients with encephalitis, seizures or status epilepticus, and antibodies to unknown neuropil antigens. The samples were obtained from worldwide referrals of patients with disorders suspected to be autoimmune between April 28, 2006, and April 25, 2013. We used samples from 75 healthy individuals and 416 patients with a range of neurological diseases as controls. We assessed the samples using immunoprecipitation, mass spectrometry, cell-based assay, and analysis of antibody effects in cultured rat hippocampal neurons with confocal microscopy. Findings Neuronal cell-membrane immunoprecipitation with serum of two index patients revealed GABAA receptor sequences. Cell-based assay with HEK293 expressing α1/β3 subunits of the GABAA receptor showed high titre serum antibodies (>1:160) and CSF antibodies in six patients. All six patients (age 3–63 years, median 22 years; five male patients) developed refractory status epilepticus or epilepsia partialis continua along with extensive cortical-subcortical MRI abnormalities; four patients needed pharmacologically induced coma. 12 of 416 control patients with other diseases, but none of the healthy controls, had low-titre GABAA receptor antibodies detectable in only serum samples, five of them also had GAD-65 antibodies. These 12 patients (age 2–74 years, median 26·5 years; seven male patients) developed a broader spectrum of symptoms probably indicative of coexisting autoimmune disorders: six had encephalitis with seizures (one with status epilepticus needing pharmacologically induced coma; one with epilepsia partialis continua), four had stiff-person syndrome (one with seizures and limbic involvement), and two had opsoclonus-myoclonus. Overall, 12 of 15 patients for whom treatment and outcome were assessable had full (three patients) or partial (nine patients) response to immunotherapy or symptomatic treatment, and three died. Patients’ antibodies caused a selective reduction of GABAA receptor clusters at synapses, but not along dendrites, without altering NMDA receptors and gephyrin (a protein that anchors the GABAA receptor). Interpretation High titres of serum and CSF GABAA receptor antibodies are associated with a severe form of encephalitis with seizures, refractory status epilepticus, or both. The antibodies cause a selective reduction of synaptic GABAA receptors. The disorder often occurs with GABAergic and other coexisting autoimmune disorders and is potentially treatable. Funding The National Institutes of Health, the McKnight Neuroscience of Brain Disorders, the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Fundació la Marató de TV3, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Rese...

Objective To report the clinical, radiological, and immunological association of demyelinating disorders with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. Methods Clinical and radiological analysis of a cohort of 691 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Determination of antibodies to NMDAR, aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) was performed using brain immunohistochemistry and cell-based assays. Results Twenty-three of 691 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis had prominent MRI and/or clinical features of demyelination. Group 1 included 12 patients in whom anti-NMDAR encephalitis was preceded or followed by independent episodes of NMO-spectrum disorder (5 cases, 4 anti-AQP4-positive), or brainstem or multifocal demyelinating syndromes (7 cases, all anti-MOG-positive). Group 2 included 11 patients in whom anti-NMDAR encephalitis occurred simultaneously with MRI and symptoms compatible with demyelination (5 AQ4-positive, 2 MOG-positive). Group 3 (136 controls) included 50 randomly selected patients with typical anti-NMDAR encephalitis, 56 with NMO, and 30 with multiple sclerosis: NMDAR-antibodies were detected only in the 50 anti-NMDAR patients, MOG-antibodies in 3/50 anti-NMDAR and 1/56 NMO patients, and AQP4-antibodies in 48/56 NMO and 1/50 anti-NMDAR patients (p<0.0001 for all comparisons with Groups 1 and 2). Most patients improved with immunotherapy, but compared with anti-NMDAR encephalitis the demyelinating episodes required more intensive therapy and resulted in more residual deficits. Only 1/23 NMDAR patients with signs of demyelination had ovarian teratoma compared with 18/50 anti-NMDAR controls (p=0.011) Interpretation Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis may develop concurrent or separate episodes of demyelinating disorders, and conversely patients with NMO or demyelinating disorders with atypical symptoms (e.g., dyskinesias, psychosis) may have anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

ObjectiveTo construct a grading score that predicts neurologic function 1 year after diagnosis of anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis.MethodsThree hundred eighty-two patients with detailed information and functional status at 1 year were studied. Factors associated with poor status (defined as modified Rankin Scale score ≥3) were identified and incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression model. This model was used to develop a 5-point prediction score, termed the anti-NMDAR Encephalitis One-Year Functional Status (NEOS) score.ResultsIntensive care unit admission (p < 0.001), treatment delay >4 weeks (p = 0.012), lack of clinical improvement within 4 weeks (p < 0.001), movement disorder (p = 0.001), central hypoventilation (p < 0.001), elevated CSF white blood cell count (p < 0.001), elevated CSF protein level (p = 0.027), and abnormal MRI (p = 0.002) were associated with 1-year functional status in univariate analysis. Intensive care unit admission, treatment delay >4 weeks, lack of clinical improvement within 4 weeks, abnormal MRI, and CSF white blood cell count >20 cells/μL were independent predictors for outcome in multivariate regression modeling. These 5 variables were assigned 1 point each to create the NEOS score. NEOS score strongly associated with the probability of poor functional status at 1 year (3% for 0 or 1 point to 69% for 4 or 5 points, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe NEOS score accurately predicts 1-year functional status in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. This score could help estimate the clinical course following diagnosis and may aid in identifying patients who could benefit from novel therapies.

Objective: To describe the clinical features and outcome of anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in patients $45 years old.Method: Observational cohort study.Results: In a cohort of 661 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, we identified 31 patients $45 years old. Compared with younger adults (18-44 years), older patients were more often male (45% vs 12%, p , 0.0001), had lower frequency of tumors (23% vs 51%, p 5 0.002; rarely teratomas), had longer median time to diagnosis (8 vs 4 weeks, p 5 0.009) and treatment (7 vs 4 weeks, p 5 0.039), and had less favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 at 2 years, 60% vs 80%, p , 0.026). In multivariable analysis, younger age (odds ratio [OR] Conclusions: Anti-NMDAR encephalitis is less severe in patients $45 years old than in young adults, but the outcome is poorer in older patients. In this age group, delays in diagnosis and treatment are more frequent than in younger patients. The frequency of underlying tumors is low, but if present they are usually carcinomas instead of teratomas in younger patients. Early and aggressive immunotherapy will likely improve the clinical outcome. Anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder that usually affects children and young adults, resulting in severe neuropsychiatric symptoms that often respond to treatment. [1][2][3][4] Experience with older patients is limited to a single case report 5 and series comprising patients of all ages, but no further information is available. We report a detailed clinical analysis of 31 patients $45 years old and describe several novel features associated with this age group.METHODS Patients with immunoglobulin G antibodies against the NR1 subunit of NMDAR were identified from a series of 661 cases with anti-NMDAR encephalitis.2 Detailed information on patients $45 years old, either as individual cases or age group, has not been reported previously. We used 45 years as the cutoff age because a similar threshold has been used in other autoimmune neurologic disorders, like myasthenia gravis. Clinical information was obtained by the authors or referring physicians at the acute stage of the disease.2 Follow-up information was obtained at regular intervals after symptom onset; neurologic status was assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. 6 Initial treatment was considered a failure if no sustained improvement occurred within 4 weeks after initiation of immunotherapy or tumor removal, and if the mRS score remained $4.2 Serum and CSF antibody studies were conducted as reported. Demographic information and symptoms were analyzed with the Fisher exact test, Fisher-Freeman-Halton test, or Mann-Whitney U test when appropriate, comparing these 31 patients with 338 recently reported patients (aged 18-44 years).

Objective:We tested whether antibody screening samples of patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis with additional research assays would improve the detection of autoimmune encephalitis compared with standard clinical testing alone.Methods:We examined 731 samples (333 CSF, 182 sera, and 108 pairs) from a cohort of 623 patients who were tested for CNS autoantibodies by the University of Pennsylvania clinical laboratory over a 24-month period with cell-based assays (CBAs) on commercially obtained slides of fixed cells for antibodies to NMDA receptor (NMDAR), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR), γ-aminobutyric acid-B receptor (GABABR), leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1), contactin-associated protein-like 2 (Caspr2), and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65). In parallel, our research laboratory screened all samples for reactivity to brain sections and for anti-NMDAR using in-house CBAs. Samples with brain reactivity or positive clinical studies were examined with CBAs for a larger panel of antibodies.Results:The clinical laboratory reported positive findings for NMDAR (80 samples), GAD65 (8), LGI1 (5), Caspr2 (2), and GABABR (4). Sixty-five serum samples and 32 CSF samples were indeterminate for one or more antibodies. In our research laboratory, all but 4 positive results were confirmed, 88 of 97 indeterminate results were resolved, and 15 additional samples were found positive (10 NMDAR, 1 AMPAR, 3 LGI1, and 1 Caspr2). Clinical information supported these diagnoses. Overall, informative autoantibodies were detected in 15.5% of cases.Conclusions:Standard clinical laboratory kits were specific, but some tests were insensitive and prone to indeterminate results. Screening with immunohistochemistry for reactivity to brain sections, followed by additional CBAs for cases with brain reactivity, improves the diagnostic accuracy of testing for autoimmune encephalitis.

No abstract