Background: Heart Rhythm Society guidelines outlining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) excluded children and epicardial or abandoned leads due to theoretical risks of harm. Research investigating these risks is lacking. The primary objective of our study is to determine the incidence of adverse events to patients or CIEDs from MRI imaging. The secondary objective is to describe CIED-related artifact on MRI images. Methods: A single-center retrospective review was performed on all patients with CIEDs who underwent 1.5 Tesla MRI between July 2007 and May 2019. We subdivided patients among four cohorts: (1) patients <18 years of age, (2) epicardial leads, (3) abandoned endocardial leads, and (4) abandoned epicardial leads. Descriptive statistics pre-and post-MRI and at follow-up within 1.5 years were conducted. Results: Fifty-four MRIs were performed on 40 patients. Median age was 21.2 years (IQR 12.0-25.0). Eighteen (33%) MRIs contained abandoned leads; 20 (37%) contained epicardial leads. Three patients, one with abandoned epicardial leads and two with abandoned endocardial leads, experienced mild discomfort at the CIED site. One adult with endocardial leads experienced a pause in the heart rate while programmed in a nonpacing mode. No clinically important changes to CIED parameters occurred. Nine MRIs (17%), especially those with functional cardiac imaging, were uninterpretable due to image artifact. Conclusion: In this study, pediatric and adult CHD patients with CIEDs, many with epicardial or abandoned leads, underwent MRIs without clinically significant complications. In some, CIED artifact reduced cardiac MRI image quality due to CIED position.

This case report describes a novel presentation of littoral cell angioma (LCA) and lymphatic malformations involving the omentum and mesentery. To our knowledge, these 2 entities have not been reported in the same patient. A 1-month term infant male presented with chylous ascites. During his workup, imaging detected splenic nodules. Biopsies revealed that the nodules were LCA and the chylous ascites was secondary to microscopic mesenteric and omental lymphatic malformations. Evaluation for a secondary malignancy, an underlying immunologic defect, and genetic causes were unrevealing. The presence of LCA and lymphatic malformations in the same patient suggests a genetic link between these 2 rare vascular disorders and may help elucidate the etiopathogenesis of these 2 poorly understood anomalies.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract