BackgroundBacterial and viral infections are known to promote airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in asthmatic patients. The mechanism behind this reaction is poorly understood, but pattern recognizing Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have recently been suggested to play a role.Materials and MethodsTo explore the relation between infection-induced airway inflammation and the development of AHR, poly(I:C) activating TLR3 and LPS triggering TLR4, were chosen to represent viral and bacterial induced interactions, respectively. Female BALB/c or MyD88-deficient C57BL/6 mice were treated intranasally with either poly(I:C), LPS or PBS (vehicle for the control group), once a day, during 4 consecutive days.ResultsWhen methacholine challenge was performed on day 5, BALB/c mice responded with an increase in airway resistance. The maximal resistance was higher in the poly(I:C) and LPS treated groups than among the controls, indicating development of AHR in response to repeated TLR activation. The proportion of lymphocytes in broncheoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) increased after poly(I:C) treatment whereas LPS enhanced the amount of neutrophils. A similar cellular pattern was seen in lung tissue. Analysis of 21 inflammatory mediators in BALF revealed that the TLR response was receptor-specific. MyD88-deficient C57BL/6 mice responded to poly (I:C) with an influx of lymphocytes, whereas LPS caused no inflammation.Conclusion In vivo activation of TLR3 and TLR4 in BALB/c mice both caused AHR in conjunction with a local inflammatory reaction. The AHR appeared to be identical regardless of which TLR that was activated, whereas the inflammation exhibited a receptor specific profile in terms of both recruited cells and inflammatory mediators. The inflammatory response caused by LPS appeared to be dependent on MyD88 pathway. Altogether the presented data indicate that the development of AHR and the induction of local inflammation might be the result of two parallel events, rather than one leading to another.

It is commonly believed that nanomaterials cause non-specific oxidative damage. Our mass spectrometry-based oxidative lipidomics analysis of all major phospholipid classes revealed highly selective patterns of pulmonary peroxidation after inhalation exposure of mice to single-walled carbon nanotubes. No oxidized molecular species were found in two most abundant phospholipid classes – phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine. Peroxidation products were identified in three relatively minor classes of anionic phospholipids, cardiolipin, phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylinositol whereby oxygenation of polyunsaturated fatty acid residues also showed unusual substrate specificity. This non-random peroxidation coincided with the accumulation of apoptotic cells in the lung. A similar selective phospholipid peroxidation profile was detected upon incubation of a mixture of total lung lipids with H2O2/cytochrome c known to catalyze cardiolipin and phosphatidylserine peroxidation in apoptotic cells. The characterized specific phospholipid peroxidation signaling pathways indicate new approaches to the development of mitochondria targeted regulators of cardiolipin peroxidation to protect against deleterious effects of pro-apoptotic effects of single-walled carbon nanotubes in the lung.

Carbohydrate-based particles are effective tools as adjuvant and allergen carriers for use in ASIT and constitutes a promising strategy to improve allergy treatment.

Background: The aim was to optimize antigen challenge for induction of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and inflammation in BALB/c mice sensitized to ovalbumin (OVA). Comparisons were made between mice challenged with OVA either as an aerosol or intranasally. The protocol that induced maximal AHR in BALB/c mice was thereafter tested in C57BL/6 mice. Method: Methacholine responsiveness was measured using the flexiVent® system to assess AHR. Inflammatory responses were investigated by histology and cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. Results: 48 h after challenge with 1 or 6% OVA aerosols, there were similar increments in AHR and BAL cells, predominantly eosinophils. When comparing the effect of 1% OVA aerosol on AHR and cell infiltration at 24 and 48 h after challenge, the responses were similar. At 24 h, intranasal OVA administration (20–200 µg) caused a dose-dependent increase in AHR. BAL cells were increased by all intranasal OVA doses and to a greater extent than after 1% OVA aerosol challenge but without any dose dependency. Histological examination confirmed that there was an increase of eosinophils in lung tissue following either challenge. In C57BL/6 mice, baseline tissue elastance was the only functional outcome that was increased after intranasal OVA challenge. Even though the AHR response was negligible in C57BL/6 mice, a similar infiltration of BAL cells was observed in both strains. Conclusion: Intranasal challenge was more effective than aerosol challenge at inducing both AHR and airway inflammation in BALB/c mice. Although intranasal challenge caused airway inflammation in C57BL/6 mice, this strain is not optimal for studying AHR.

The aim of the current study was to define how cyclooxygenase (COX)-activity affects airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and inflammation using interventions with COX inhibitors at different time points during allergen challenge and/or prior to measurement of AHR in an eosinophil-driven allergic mouse model. Inflammatory cells were assessed in bronchioalveolar lavage (BAL) and AHR was evaluated as the total lung resistance to methacholine (MCh) challenge.Administration of FR122047 (COX-1 inhibitor) during ovalbumin (OVA) challenge and prior to MCh challenge enhanced AHR without affecting the inflammatory cell response. In contrast, administration of lumiracoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) during the same time period had no effect on AHR but reduced the inflammatory cells in BAL. Nonselective COX inhibition with diclofenac both enhanced the AHR and reduced the inflammatory cells.Administration of diclofenac only during OVA challenge reduced the cells in BAL without any changes in AHR, whereas administration of diclofenac only prior to MCh challenge enhanced AHR but did not affect the cells in BAL.The present study implicates distinct roles of prostanoids generated along the COX-1 and COX-2 pathways and, furthermore, that inflammatory cells in BAL do not change in parallel with AHR. These findings support the fact that AHR and the inflammatory response are distinct and, at least in part, uncoupled events.