The current study examined memory and executive functioning in a sample of children who were hospital ized in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after birth. Thirty-two children born prematurely and/or with medical complications (NICU children) and 25 control children born at term were assessed with the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery (CANTAB), a multi-dimensional computer-based measure of memory and executive functioning. Comparisons between the NICU and control groups on the CANTAB subscales indicated that the NICU children had a shorter spatial memory span length and committed more forgetting errors on a spatial working memory task. Correlational analyses demonstrated that the number and extent of medical complications at birth was negatively associated with spatial memory span, planning and spatial recognition memory. Multiple regression models suggested that gestational age was of primary importance in predicting spatial memory span, while neurobiological risk was primary in the prediction of spatial working memory errors. Overall, the current results showed fewer deficits in this group of children than were found in a previous neuropsychological assessment of this cohort. The implications of this finding for discerning the effects of neural plasticity over and above normal brain maturational processes are discussed.

Understanding a care coordination framework, its functions, and its effects on children and families is critical for patients and families themselves, as well as for pediatricians, pediatric medical subspecialists/ surgical specialists, and anyone providing services to children and families. Care coordination is an essential element of a transformed American health care delivery system that emphasizes optimal quality and cost outcomes, addresses family-centered care, and calls for partnership across various settings and communities. High-quality, cost-effective health care requires that the delivery system include elements for the provision of services supporting the coordination of care across settings and professionals. This requirement of supporting coordination of care is generally true for health systems providing care for all children and youth but especially for those with special health care needs. At the foundation of an efficient and effective system of care delivery is the patient-/family-centered medical home. From its inception, the medical home has had care coordination as a core element. In general, optimal outcomes for children and youth, especially those with special health care needs, require interfacing among multiple care systems and individuals, including the following: medical, social, and behavioral professionals; the educational system; payers; medical equipment providers; home care agencies; advocacy groups; needed supportive therapies/services; and families. Coordination of care across settings permits an integration of services that is centered on the comprehensive needs of the patient and family, leading to decreased health care costs, reduction in fragmented care, and improvement in the patient/family experience of care. Pediatrics 2014;133:e1451-e1460

Cognitive performance in 7- to 9-year-old preterm neonatal intensive-care survivors was compared with that in age-matched control children. Non-verbal memory span, spatial working-memory abilities, planning, set-shifting, and recognition memory for both spatial and patterned stimuli were assessed using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery. Relative to children in the control group, neonatal intensive-care unit (NICU) survivors demonstrated 25% more memory errors on the spatial working-memory task. Their use of strategy on this task was similar to a control group of 5-year-olds. Planning times on 'Tower of London' problems were long relative to those of term controls. NICU survivors demonstrated poorer pattern recognition as well as a shorter spatial memory span. The groups did not differ in visual-discrimination learning or in spatial-recognition memory. No specific neonatal risk factor accounted for the observed differences, although scores on the Neurobiological Risk Score (NBRS), a composite measure of neonatal risk, did predict several aspects of later task performance. Whether these data reflect a developmental delay in brain maturation in NICU survivors or the presence of a permanent information-processing deficit due to adverse neonatal events must be assessed through continued follow-up.

No abstract

Children's unique perspectives should be sought regularly and their data included in ongoing programs of quality assessment. When only parents are queried, important and insightful perspectives of children are missed that could improve care quality.

Cognitive performance in 7‐ to 9‐year‐old preterm neonatal intensive‐care survivors was compared with that in age‐matched control children. Non‐verbal memory span, spatial working‐memory abilities, planning, set‐shifting, and recognition memory for both spatial and patterned stimuli were assessed using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery. Relative to children in the control group, neonatal intensive‐care unit (NICU) survivors demonstrated 25% more memory errors on the spatial working‐memory task. Their use of strategy on this task was similar to a control group of 5‐year‐olds. Planning times on‘Tower of London’problems were long relative to those of term controls. NICU survivors demonstrated poorer pattern recognition as well as a shorter spatial memory span. The groups did not differ in visual‐discrimination learning or in spatial‐recognition memory. No specific neonatal risk factor accounted for the observed differences, although scores on the Neurobiological Risk Score (NBRS), a composite measure of neonatal risk, did predict several aspects of later task performance. Whether these data reflect a developmental delay in brain maturation in NICU survivors or the presence of a permanent information‐processing deficit due to adverse neonatal events must be assessed through continued follow‐up.

No abstract

To ensure an adequate supply of knowledgeable and skillful rural health care professionals, continuing education specific to the delivery of care in rural settings is necessary. Once developed, the continuing education must be delivered in a manner that is acceptable and accessible to isolated rural providers.