The aim of this study was to investigate the risk and to analyse the significance of laceration of the sural and superficial fibular nerves during the surgical approach to the lateral malleolus. The sural and the superficial fibular nerves, and their branches were dissected under i3 magnifying lenses in 68 embalmed legankle-foot specimens. The specimens were measured, drawn and photographed. In 35 % of specimens the superficial fibular nerve branched before piercing the crural fascia, and in all these specimens the medial dorsal cutaneous nerve of the foot was located in the anterior compartment while the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve of the foot was located in the lateral compartment. In 35 % of specimens the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve of the foot was absent or did not innervate any toe. The deep part of the superficial fibular nerve was in contact with the intermuscular septum. Its superficial part was parallel with the lateral malleolus when the nerve pierced the fascia more proximally and oblique to the lateral malleolus when the nerve pierced the fascia distally. In one case the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve of the foot was in danger of laceration during a subcutaneous incision to the lateral malleolus. In 7 cases (10 %) the sural nerve overlapped or was tangent to the tip of the malleolus. Malleolar nerve branches were identified in 76 % of the cases (in 28 % from both sources). The sural nerve supplies the lateral 5 dorsal digital nerves in 40 % of cases. Our study indicates that during the approach to the lateral malleolus there is a high risk of laceration of malleolar branches from both the sural and the superficial fibular nerves. There is less risk of damage to the main trunk of these nerves, but the 10 % chance of laceration of sural nerve at the tip of the malleolus is significant. As the sural nerve supplies the superficial innervation to the lateral half of the foot and toes in 40 % of cases, the risk of its laceration is even more important than indicated by the common anatomical teaching.

This investigation studied the effects of simulated plantar flexor muscle activity on forefoot loading using a static cadaver model. Nine cadaver feet were mounted in an apparatus in the heel rise position. Using computer-controlled and pneumatic actuators, forces were simultaneously applied to the tendons of the triceps surae, flexor hallucis longus, flexor digitorum longus, peroneus brevis and longus, and tibialis posterior until 750 N of ground reaction force was achieved, at which time forefoot plantar pressure patterns were captured immediately with a pedobarograph. Second metatarsal bending moments were calculated from strain gauge data collected concurrently. Consecutive loading cycles were performed with sequential elimination of simulated muscle force from each tendon except the Achilles. Loss of simulated flexor hallucis longus activity significantly decreased great toe contact forces and significantly increased forces under the forefoot. Simulated loss of both the flexor hallucis longus and flexor digitorum longus caused significant decreases in contact area, pressure, and force beneath the toes and significant increases in contact area and force under the forefoot. Bending moments in the second metatarsal were shown to vary directly with peak pressure under the second metatarsal head (r = 0.801). These findings demonstrate the load distributing function of the extrinsic plantar flexors during heel rise.

Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection of TC.The aims of our study were to establish the incidence of TC; the association between T C and accessory tarsal bones and between TC and tarsal arthritis; and to assess the sensitivity of CT as a diagnostic tool in TC. We performed spiral CT scans of 100 cadaver feet (mean age at death 77.7 & 10.4), which were subsequently dissected. The dissections identified nine non-osseous TC: two talocalcaneal and seven calcaneonavicular. There was no osseous coalition. Tarsal arthritis was identified in 3 1 cases. Both talocalcaneal coalitions were associated with arthritis while none of the calcaneonavicular coalitions were associated with tarsal arthritis. The CT diagnosed an osseous talocalcaneal coalition and was suspicious of fibrocartilaginous coalitions in eight cases. There was correlation between dissection and CT in two talocalcaneal coalitions and three calcaneonavicular coalitions thus CT identifying 55.50/0 of the coalitions. C T did not diagnose four non-osseous coalitions and diagnosed errouresly four possible coalitions. In conclusion our study demonstrated that the incidence of non-osseous T C is higher than previously thought ( 12.72'%). The calcaneonavicular coalitions are the most common single type (9.09%) and they d o not seem to be associated with arthritic changes in the tarsal bones. Our CT results suggest that spiral CT has a low sensitivity in the detection of non-osseous coalitions and questions if multislice CT should be used routinely when TC are suspected.Crown

No abstract