Background: Patients with chromosome 18 abnormalities can present with an immune phenotype that resembles common variable immunodeficiency. Knowledge of the genes underlying the immune defects related to chromosome 18 aberrations could improve our understanding of the molecular basis of primary antibody deficiencies. Here we present a patient with ring chromosome 18 affected by primary antibody deficiency and autoimmunity. Methods: Lymphocyte populations were determined by flow cytometry. Specific antibody response to protein vaccines and pneumococcal capsule antigen were measured by ELISA. Genome sequencing was performed using a PCR-free protocol. Case: The patient was diagnosed with ring chromosome 18 for delayed growth and dysmorphic features at the age of 1 month. Array comparative genomic hybridization showed deletions of 18p11.21-pter and 18q21.31-qter. At the age of 10 months, she started having recurrent episodes of otitis media and pneumonia, as well as autoimmune arthritis. Serum immunoglobulins and specific antibody levels were low. The CD19+CD27+ memory B cell and CD45RO+ T cell populations were decreased. Recurrent infections were controlled with parenteral immunoglobulin and autoimmune arthritis was treated with systemic and intra-articular therapies. Conclusions: Selective IgA deficiency is the most common form of immunodeficiency associated with chromosome 18 abnormalities, however patients with ring chromosome 18 may also be affected by specific antibody deficiency and require immunoglobulin replacement for optimal care. These patients might partially share the same genomic loss as in patients with non-syndromic primary antibody deficiency. Statement of novelty: This report highlights an important teaching point about immune deficiency in a chromosomal anomaly that is not infrequently encountered in pediatric hospitals. Furthermore, our investigations provide more insight into the pathogenesis of immunodeficiency among patients with chromosome 18 abnormalities.
ObjectiveA demonstration project of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was initiated in 2011 among more than 23,000 women attending routine cervical cancer screening. We examined the additional diagnostic performance of HPV genotyping for detecting disease in women with abnormal cytology.MethodsWomen aged 30 to 65 years were originally screened for HPV using Hybrid Capture II test. Women with positive results were triaged using conventional cytology, and those with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (≥ASC-US) were referred to colposcopy. We retrospectively genotyped (Roche cobas 4800 HPV system [Roche Molecular Systems Inc, Pleasanton, CA]) cervical specimens that were HPV+ with Hybrid Capture II test and extracted women's medical history postbaseline screening. We calculated positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of triage tests to detect histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) within the first year of follow-up among women positive for HPV16, HPV18, and HPV16 and/or HPV18 as well as among those negative for HPVs 16 and 18.ResultsOf 1,396 HPV-positive women, 1,092 (78%) were classified as normal, 136 (10%) had CIN1, 80 (6%) had CIN2, 81 (6%) had CIN3, and 7 women had cancer throughout the entire follow-up period. Seventy CIN2+ cases were detected within the first year of follow-up. The PPV for detecting CIN2+ was 20.9% (63/239; 95% CI = 16.4–25.9) for ASC-US+ cytology. In women with ASC-US+, PPVs were 31.2% (24/77; 95% CI = 21.1–42.7) for HPV16+, 27.8% (5/18; 95% CI = 9.7–53.5) for HPV18+, 30.8% (28/91; 95% CI = 21.5–41.3) for HPV16+ and/or HPV18+ women, and 16.6% (35/211; 95% CI = 11.8–22.3) in women testing negative for HPVs 16 and 18.ConclusionPartial genotyping as an additional triage strategy to cytology can markedly improve clinical diagnostic performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.