The dual process model (Evans, 2008) posits two types of decision-making, which may be ordered on a continuum from intuitive to analytical (Hammond, 1981). This work uses a dataset of narrated image-based clinical reasoning, collected from physicians as they diagnosed dermatological cases presented as images. Two annotators with training in cognitive psychology assigned each narrative a rating on a four-point decision scale, from intuitive to analytical. This work discusses the annotation study, and makes contributions for resource creation methodology and analysis in the clinical domain.
Clinical decision-making has high-stakes outcomes for both physicians and patients, yet little research has attempted to model and automatically annotate such decision-making. The dual process model (Evans, 2008) posits two types of decision-making, which may be ordered on a continuum from intuitive to analytical (Hammond, 1981). Training clinicians to recognize decision-making style and select the most appropriate mode of reasoning for a particular context may help reduce diagnostic error (Norman, 2009). This study makes preliminary steps towards detection of decision style, based on an annotated dataset of image-based clinical reasoning in which speech data were collected from physicians as they inspected images of dermatological cases and moved towards diagnosis (Hochberg et al., 2014). A classifier was developed based on lexical, speech, disfluency, physician demographic, cognitive, and diagnostic difficulty features. Using random forests for binary classification of intuitive vs. analytical decision style in physicians' diagnostic descriptions, the model improved on the baseline by over 30%. The introduced computational model provides construct validity for decision styles, as well as insights into the linguistic expression of decision-making. Eventually, such modeling may be incorporated into instructional systems that teach clinicians to become more effective decision makers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.