Pattern recognition methods for classifying user motion intent based on surface electromyography developed by research groups in well-controlled laboratory conditions are not yet clinically viable for upper limb prosthesis control, due to their limited robustness in users' real-life situations. To address this problem, a novel postprocessing algorithm, aiming to detect and remove misclassifications of a pattern recognition system of forearm and hand motions, is proposed. Using the maximum likelihood calculated by a classifier and the mean global muscle activity of the forearm, an artificial neural network was trained to detect potentially erroneous classification decisions. This system was compared to four previously proposed classification postprocessing methods, in both able-bodied and amputee subjects. Various nonstationarities were included in the experimental protocol to account for challenges posed in real-life settings, such as different contraction levels, static and dynamic motion phases, and effects induced by day-to-day transfers, such as electrode shifts, impedance changes, and psychometric user variability. The improvement in classification accuracy with respect to the unprocessed classifier ranged from 4.8% to 31.6%, depending on the scenarios investigated. The system significantly reduced misclassifications to wrong active classes and is thus a promising approach for improving the robustness of hand prosthesis controllability.
Highlights► The excitability time constant chronaxie for electrical stimulation is analyzed. ► Chronaxie varies along the neural axis. ► Extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes causes short chronaxies. ► In some cases strength–duration curves have a bimodal shape.
Long-term functioning of a hand prosthesis is crucial for its acceptance by patients with upper limb deficit. In this study the reliability over days of the performance of pattern classification approaches based on surface electromyography (sEMG) signal for the control of upper limb prostheses was investigated. Recordings of sEMG from the forearm muscles were obtained across five consecutive days from five healthy subjects. It was demonstrated that the classification performance decreased monotonically on average by 4.1% per day. It was also found that the accumulated error was confined to three of the eight movement classes investigated. This contribution gives insight on the long term behavior of pattern classification, which is crucial for commercial viability.
We present the real time simultaneous and proportional control of two degrees of freedom (DoF), using surface electromyographic signals from the residual limbs of three subject with limb deficiency. Three subjects could control a virtual object in two dimensions using their residual muscle activities to achieve goal-oriented tasks. The subjects indicated that they found the control intuitive and useful. These results show that such a simultaneous and proportional control paradigm is a promising direction for multi-functional prosthetic control.
BackgroundElectrocutaneous stimulation can restore the missing sensory information to prosthetic users. In electrotactile feedback, the information about the prosthesis state is transmitted in the form of pulse trains. The stimulation frequency is an important parameter since it influences the data transmission rate over the feedback channel as well as the form of the elicited tactile sensations.MethodsWe evaluated the influence of the stimulation frequency on the subject’s ability to utilize the feedback information during electrotactile closed-loop control. Ten healthy subjects performed a real-time compensatory tracking (standard test bench) of sinusoids and pseudorandom signals using either visual feedback (benchmark) or electrocutaneous feedback in seven conditions characterized by different combinations of the stimulation frequency (FSTIM) and tracking error sampling rate (FTE). The tracking error was transmitted using two concentric electrodes placed on the forearm. The quality of tracking was assessed using the Squared Pearson Correlation Coefficient (SPCC), the Normalized Root Mean Square Tracking Error (NRMSTE) and the time delay between the reference and generated trajectories (TDIO).ResultsThe results demonstrated that FSTIM was more important for the control performance than FTE. The quality of tracking deteriorated with a decrease in the stimulation frequency, SPCC and NRMSTE (mean) were 87.5% and 9.4% in the condition 100/100 (FTE/FSTIM), respectively, and deteriorated to 61.1% and 15.3% in 5/5, respectively, while the TDIO increased from 359.8 ms in 100/100 to 1009 ms in 5/5. However, the performance recovered when the tracking error sampled at a low rate was delivered using a high stimulation frequency (SPCC = 83.6%, NRMSTE = 10.3%, TDIO = 415.6 ms, in 5/100).ConclusionsThe likely reason for the performance decrease and recovery was that the stimulation frequency critically influenced the tactile perception quality and thereby the effective rate of information transfer through the feedback channel. The outcome of this study can facilitate the selection of optimal system parameters for somatosensory feedback in upper limb prostheses. The results imply that the feedback variables (e.g., grasping force) should be transmitted at relatively high frequencies of stimulation (>25 Hz), but that they can be sampled at much lower rates (e.g., 5 Hz).Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0022-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.