Background/Aims: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has gained interest over the last decade as a viable option for early start dialysis. It is still unknown if shorter break-in periods and less time for proper patient evaluation and training could influence technique survival in comparison to planned-start PD. Methods: A prospective and observational study that compared technique survival in a cohort of patients who started either early or planned PD. Early start PD was defined as break-in period from 3 to 14 days with no previous nephrologist follow-up or patient training. Results: A total of 154 patients were included (40 as early start PD), followed by a median time of 381 days. Comparing early vs. planned-start PD, groups were similar concerning age 56 (40; 70) vs. 48 (32; 63) years, p=0.071, body mass index (BMI) 23.3 ± 4.2 vs. 23.8 ± 4.0 kg/m², p=0.567 and male gender (60 vs. 48%, p=0.201), respectively. Comparing early vs. planned-start groups, there were no differences regarding PD dropout for peritonitis (7.5 vs. 11.4%, p=0.764), catheter dysfunction (12.5 vs. 17.5%, p=0.619) and patient burnout (0 vs. 4.4%, p=0.328), respectively. Less patients in early start group quit PD for peritoneal membrane failure in comparison to planned-start group (2.5 vs. 16.7%, p=0.026). In multivariate cox-regression analysis, the only factors independently associated with technique failure were BMI> 25 kg/m² (p=0.033) and Diabetes Mellitus (p=0.013), whereas no differences regarding early vs. planned-PD start were observed (p=0.184). Conclusion: Despite the adverse scenario for initiating dialysis, early start PD had similar outcomes in comparison to planned-start PD in long-term follow-up.

No abstract

Background: Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) exhibit increased levels of uremic toxins, which are associated with poor outcomes. Recently, new dialysis membranes have allowed clearance of solutes with higher molecular weight, without significant albumin losses high-retention-onset-HD (HRO-HD). Methods: Prospective crossover trial, in which 16 prevalent patients switched from high-flux HD (HF-HD) to online hemodiafiltration (olHDF) and HRO-HD for 4 weeks. The following variables were evaluated: pre- and post-dialysis serum concentrations of albumin, urea, phosphate (P), beta-2 microglobulin (β2M), and total mass (TM) extraction and dialyzer clearance of urea, P, and β2M. Results: Comparing HF-HD, olHDF, and HRO-HD, respectively, there were no differences regarding pre-dialysis serum concentrations of albumin (3.94 ± 0.36, 4.06 ± 0.22, and 3.93 ± 0.41 g/dL, p = 0.495), urea (166 ± 29, 167 ± 30, and 164 ± 27 mg/dL, p = 0.971), P (4.9 ± 2.1, 5.2 ± 1.6, and 4.9 ± 2.1 mg/dL, p = 0.879), and β2M (31.3 ± 7.1, 32.6 ± 8.6, and 33.7 ± 5.9 µg/mL, p = 0.646). β2M clearance was significantly lower in HF-HD in comparison to both olHDF and HRO-HD: 43 (37–53) versus 64 (48–85) mL/min, p = 0.013, and 69 (58–86) mL/min, p = 0.015, respectively. Post-dialysis β2M serum concentration was higher in HF-HD in comparison to olHDF and HRO-HD: 11.6 (9.6–12.4) vs. 5.7 (4.5–7.0) µg/mL, p = 0.001, and 5.6 (5.3–7.6) µg/mL, p = 0.001, respectively. TM extraction of urea, P, and β2M were similar across the 3 dialysis modalities. Conclusions: olHDF and HRO-HD were superior to HF-HD regarding β2M clearance, leading to lower post-dialysis β2M levels.

Background: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Icodextrin has a greater ultrafiltration power and could improve left ventricular mass by treating fluid overload. Findings from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), however, are scarce. Methods: This is a randomized cohort that included prevalent patients on PD recruited from 2 tertiary hospitals. Patients were allocated to the glucose (GLU) or icodextrin (ICO) group. Clinical, demographic, biochemical, bioimpedance (extracellular water/total body water ratio – AEC/ACT) data, and cardiac MRI were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. The outcome was a change in left ventricular mass adjusted by surface area (ΔLVMI). Results: 22 completed the study (GLU, N=12 and ICO, N=10). Patients from GLU and ICO groups had similar age, sex, underlying disease, and time on dialysis. At baseline, LVH was found in 17 patients (77.3%), with no difference between groups (p=0.748). According to ECW/TBW, 36.8% and 80% of patients from GLU and ICO groups, respectively, were considered hypervolemic (p=0.044). During follow-up, ΔLVMI was 3.9 (-10.7, 2.2)g/m in GLU and 5.2 (-26.8, 16.8) in ICO group (p=0.651). ΔLVMI correlated with change in ΔBNP (r=0.566, p=0.044), and remained significant in a multiple regression analysis. Conclusion: We found no superiority of icodextrin to glucose-based solution in improving LMVI in prevalent patients on PD. Whether icodextrin would improve LVMI in long-term follow-up deserver further evaluation.

Introduction: Patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) are usually exposed to a high dialysate calcium concentration (D[Ca]), which is associated with undesirable effects. Low D[Ca] might overstimulate parathyroid hormone (PTH), as shown by previous studies carried out before the incorporation of calcimimetics in clinical practice. We hypothesized that a reduction in D[Ca] is safe and without risk for a rise in serum PTH. Methods in this prospective study, the D[Ca] was reduced from 1.75 mmol/L to 1.25 mmol/L for one year in prevalent patients on PD. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical parameters were evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. Results Patients (N = 20) aged 56 ± 16 years, 50% male, 25% diabetic. There was no significant change in calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, 25(OH)-vitamin D or PTH over time. Medication adjustments included an increase in calcitriol and sevelamer. After 1 year, absolute and percentual change in PTH levels were 36 (-58, 139) pg/ml, and 20% (-28, 45) respectively. The proportion of patients with PTH > 300 pg/ml did not change during the follow-up (p = 0.173). Conclusion Low D[Ca] concentration should be considered to patients on PD as a valuable and safe option. Medication adjustments to detain PTH rising, however, are advised.