How different organs are formed from small sets of undifferentiated precursor cells is a key question in developmental biology. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying organ specification in plants, we studied the function of the homeotic selector genes APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), which control the formation of petals and stamens during Arabidopsis flower development. To this end, we characterized the activities of the transcription factors that AP3 and PI encode throughout flower development by using perturbation assays as well as transcript profiling and genomewide localization studies, in combination with a floral induction system that allows a stage-specific analysis of flower development by genomic technologies. We discovered considerable spatial and temporal differences in the requirement for AP3/PI activity during flower formation and show that they control different sets of genes at distinct phases of flower development. The genomewide identification of target genes revealed that AP3/PI act as bifunctional transcription factors: they activate genes involved in the control of numerous developmental processes required for organogenesis and repress key regulators of carpel formation. Our results imply considerable changes in the composition and topology of the gene network controlled by AP3/PI during the course of flower development. We discuss our results in light of a model for the mechanism underlying sex-determination in seed plants, in which AP3/PI orthologues might act as a switch between the activation of male and the repression of female development.F lowers are typically composed of four organ types, which are disposed in four floral whorls. From the outside of the flower to the center, they are sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels (the subunits of the gynoecium). The developmental fate of these different types of organs is specified by a small number of floral organ identity genes. The pivotal role of these genes was uncovered through the analysis of mutants that form flowers with homeotic transformations, i.e., the replacement of one type of organ with another (1-4). Based on the morphological defects of the individual mutants and their genetic interactions, it was proposed that the floral organ identity genes act in a combinatorial manner and have distinct functions during flower development, with the so-called A function genes being required for the formation of sepals and petals, B function genes for petal and stamen development, and C function genes for the formation of stamens and carpels. This well-established ABC model of floral organ identity specification (5) has provided, since its introduction more than 20 y ago, an invaluable framework for the analysis of the genetic mechanisms underlying the formation and evolution of flowers.Molecular characterization of the floral organ identity genes in different species revealed that they encode transcription factors and belong, with few exceptions, to the family of MADS domain proteins (1-3). The floral organ identity factors w...

The floral organ identity factor AGAMOUS (AG) is a key regulator of Arabidopsis thaliana flower development, where it is involved in the formation of the reproductive floral organs as well as in the control of meristem determinacy. To obtain insights into how AG specifies organ fate, we determined the genes and processes acting downstream of this C function regulator during early flower development and distinguished between direct and indirect effects. To this end, we combined genome-wide localization studies, gene perturbation experiments, and computational analyses. Our results demonstrate that AG controls flower development to a large extent by controlling the expression of other genes with regulatory functions, which are involved in mediating a plethora of different developmental processes. One aspect of this function is the suppression of the leaf development program in emerging floral primordia. Using trichome initiation as an example, we demonstrate that AG inhibits an important aspect of leaf development through the direct control of key regulatory genes. A comparison of the gene expression programs controlled by AG and the B function regulators APETALA3 and PISTILLATA, respectively, showed that while they control many developmental processes in conjunction, they also have marked antagonistic, as well as independent activities. INTRODUCTIONHow different types of organs are formed from undifferentiated stem cells is a central question in biology. It is known that in both plants and animals, organogenesis is controlled to a large extent by master regulatory genes, which typically encode transcription factors. While it is currently not well understood how these regulators act at the molecular level, the recent development of experimental approaches that allow the characterization of protein-DNA interactions and transcriptional profiles on a genome-wide scale has led to detailed insights into the function of some of these transcription factors (Wellmer and Riechmann, 2005;Hueber and Lohmann, 2008).In flowering plants, the different types of floral organs (i.e., sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels) are specified by the activities of a small set of master regulators, termed floral organ identity genes Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991). The pivotal role of these genes in flower development was uncovered through the identification of mutants that exhibit homeotic transformations (i.e., the replacement of one organ type by another) . Based on the phenotypes of these mutants, it was proposed that the floral organ identity genes control organ fate in a combinatorial manner (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991). According to this socalled ABC model, sepals are specified by A function genes, petals by a combination of A and B function activities, stamens by B and C function genes, and carpels by C function gene activity alone. The molecular characterization of the genes affected in floral homeotic mutants in different species showed that they encode transcription factors and belong, with few exceptions, to the family of MADS domain ...

The transcription factors LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1), together with the AP1 paralog CAULIFLOWER (CAL), control the onset of flower development in a partially redundant manner. This redundancy is thought to be mediated, at least in part, through the regulation of a shared set of target genes. However, whether these genes are independently or cooperatively regulated by LFY and AP1/CAL is currently unknown. To better understand the regulatory relationship between LFY and AP1/CAL and to obtain deeper insights into the control of floral initiation, we monitored the activity of LFY in the absence of AP1/CAL function. We found that the regulation of several known LFY target genes is unaffected by AP1/CAL perturbation, while others appear to require AP1/CAL activity. Furthermore, we obtained evidence that LFY and AP1/CAL control the expression of some genes in an antagonistic manner. Notably, these include key regulators of floral initiation such as (), which had been previously reported to be directly repressed by both LFY and AP1. We show here that expression is suppressed by AP1 but promoted by LFY. We further demonstrate that LFY has an inhibitory effect on flower formation in the absence of AP1/CAL activity. We propose that LFY and AP1/CAL act as part of an incoherent feed-forward loop, a network motif where two interconnected pathways or transcription factors act in opposite directions on a target gene, to control the establishment of a stable developmental program for the formation of flowers.

Identifying the transcription factors that mediate responses to abiotic stress is of fundamental importance in plant biology, not least because of their potential utility in crop improvement. The recently duplicated genes RAP2.4B and RAP2.4 encode transcription factors belonging to the abiotic stress-associated DREB A-6 clade in Arabidopsis thaliana. Both proteins localise exclusively to nuclei and show similar DRE-element-binding characteristics. Expression analysis of stressed and non-stressed plants revealed partially overlapping expression patterns. Both genes were highly expressed in stems and roots and were differentially induced in response to cold, dehydration and osmotic stress. RAP2.4B, however, was uniquely expressed at a high level in dry seeds and was induced by heat stress, while RAP2.4 was uniquely induced at a high level by salt stress. Microarray-based transcriptional profiling of double knockout and overexpression lines revealed altered expression of genes associated with adaptation to drought stress. Most strikingly, six aquaporin genes, five of which are members of a recently identified co-expression network, were downregulated in the double knockout line and correspondingly upregulated in the overexpression line, suggesting that these DREBs play a role in the regulation of water homeostasis.

The gene regulatory network comprised of LEAFY (LFY), APETALA1 (AP1), the AP1 paralog CAULIFLOWER (CAL), and TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) is a major determinant of the flowering process in Arabidopsis thaliana. TFL1 activity in the shoot apical meristem provides inflorescence identity while the transcription factors LFY and AP1/CAL confer floral identity to emerging floral primordia. It has been thought that LFY and AP1/CAL control the onset of flowering in part by repressing TFL1 expression in flowers. However, in the June issue of Plant Physiology, we reported that LFY and AP1 act antagonistically in the regulation of several key flowering regulators, including TFL1. Specifically, TFL1 transcription was suppressed by AP1 but promoted by LFY. Here, we present additional evidence for the role of LFY as an activator of TFL1 and propose that this regulatory activity is pivotal for the indeterminate growth of the SAM during the reproductive phase of development.