The tumor microenvironment (TME) surrounding tumor cells is a complex and highly dynamic system that promotes tumorigenesis. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are key elements in TME playing a pivotal role in cancer cells’ proliferation and metastatic spreading. Considering the high expression of the fibroblast activation protein (FAP) on the cell membrane, CAFs emerged as appealing TME targets, namely for molecular imaging, leading to a pan-tumoral approach. Therefore, FAP inhibitors (FAPis) have recently been developed for PET imaging and radioligand therapy, exploring the clinical application in different tumor sub-types. The present review aimed to describe recent developments regarding radiolabeled FAP inhibitors and evaluate the possible translation of this pan-tumoral approach in clinical practice. At present, the application of FAPi-PET has been explored mainly in single-center studies, generally performed in small and heterogeneous cohorts of oncological patients. However, preliminary results were promising, in particular in low FDG-avid tumors, such as primary liver and gastro-entero-pancreatic cancer, or in regions with an unfavorable tumor-to-background ratio at FDG-PET/CT (i.e., brain), and in radiotherapy planning of head and neck tumors. Further promising results have been obtained in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis, especially in ovarian and gastric cancer. Data regarding the theranostics approach are still limited at present, and definitive conclusions about its efficacy cannot be drawn at present. Nevertheless, the use of FAPi-based radio-ligand to treat the TME has been evaluated in first-in-human studies and appears feasible. Although the pan-tumoral approach in molecular imaging showed promising results, its real impact in day-to-day clinical practice has yet to be confirmed, and multi-center prospective studies powered for efficacy are needed.
Radiomic analysis of 18F[FDG] PET/CT images might identify predictive imaging biomarkers, however, the reproducibility of this quantitative approach might depend on the methodology adopted for image analysis. This retrospective study investigates the impact of PET segmentation method and the selection of different target lesions on the radiomic analysis of baseline 18F[FDG] PET/CT images in a population of newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. The whole tumor burden was segmented on PET images applying six methods: (1) 2.5 standardized uptake value (SUV) threshold; (2) 25% maximum SUV (SUVmax) threshold; (3) 42% SUVmax threshold; (4) 1.3∙liver uptake threshold; (5) intersection among 1, 2, 4; and (6) intersection among 1, 3, 4. For each method, total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and whole-body total lesion glycolysis (WTLG) were assessed, and their association with survival outcomes (progression-free survival PFS and overall survival OS) was investigated. Methods 1 and 2 provided stronger associations and were selected for the next steps. Radiomic analysis was then performed on two target lesions for each patient: the one with the highest SUV and the largest one. Fifty-three radiomic features were extracted, and radiomic scores to predict PFS and OS were obtained. Two proportional-hazard regression Cox models for PFS and OS were developed: (1) univariate radiomic models based on radiomic score; and (2) multivariable clinical–radiomic model including radiomic score and clinical/diagnostic parameters (IPI score, SUVmax, TMTV, WTLG, lesion volume). The models were created in the four scenarios obtained by varying the segmentation method and/or the target lesion; the models’ performances were compared (C-index). In all scenarios, the radiomic score was significantly associated with PFS and OS both at univariate and multivariable analysis (p < 0.001), in the latter case in association with the IPI score. When comparing the models’ performances in the four scenarios, the C-indexes agreed within the confidence interval. C-index ranges were 0.79–0.81 and 0.80–0.83 for PFS radiomic and clinical–radiomic models; 0.82–0.87 and 0.83–0.90 for OS radiomic and clinical–radiomic models. In conclusion, the selection of either between two PET segmentation methods and two target lesions for radiomic analysis did not significantly affect the performance of the prognostic models built on radiomic and clinical data of DLBCL patients. These results prompt further investigation of the proposed methodology on a validation dataset.
To evaluate the association between radiomic features (RFs) extracted from 18F‐FDG PET/CT (18F‐FDG‐PET) with progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in diffuse large‐B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients eligible to first‐line chemotherapy. DLBCL patients who underwent 18F‐FDG‐PET prior to first‐line chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. RFs were extracted from the lesion showing the highest uptake. A radiomic score to predict PFS and OS was obtained by multivariable Elastic Net Cox model. Radiomic univariate model, clinical and combined clinical‐radiomic multivariable models to predict PFS and OS were obtained. 112 patients were analyzed. Median follow‐up was 34.7 months (Inter‐Quartile Range (IQR) 11.3–66.3 months) for PFS and 41.1 (IQR 18.4–68.9) for OS. Radiomic score resulted associated with PFS and OS (p < 0.001), outperforming conventional PET parameters. C‐index (95% CI) for PFS prediction were 0.67 (0.58–0.76), 0.81 (0.75–0.88) and 0.84 (0.77–0.91) for clinical, radiomic and combined clinical‐radiomic model, respectively. C‐index for OS were 0.77 (0.66–0.89), 0.84 (0.76–0.91) and 0.90 (0.81–0.98). In the Kaplan‐Meier analysis (low‐IPI vs. high‐IPI), the radiomic score was significant predictor of PFS (p < 0.001). The radiomic score was an independent prognostic biomarker of survival in DLBCL patients. The extraction of RFs from baseline 18F‐FDG‐PET might be proposed in DLBCL to stratify high‐risk versus low‐risk patients of relapse after first‐line therapy, especially in low‐IPI patients.
Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is the second most frequent histological type of breast cancer (BC) and includes a heterogeneous spectrum of diseases with unique characteristics, especially the infiltrative growth pattern and metastatic spread. [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is extensively used in oncology and BC patient evaluation. Its role in ILCs is considered suboptimal due to its low FDG avidity. Therefore, ILCs could benefit from molecular imaging with non-FDG tracers that target other specific pathways, contributing to precision medicine. This narrative review aims to summarize the current literature on the use of FDG-PET/CT in ILC and to discuss future opportunities given by the development of innovative non-FDG radiotracers.
The tumor microenvironment (TME) surrounding tumor cells is a complex and highly dynamic system that promotes tumorigenesis. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are key elements in TME playing a pivotal role in cancer cells’ proliferation and metastatic spreading. Considering the high expression of the fibroblast activation protein (FAP) on cell membrane, CAFs emerged as appealing TME targets, namely for molecular imaging, leading to a pan-tumoral approach. Therefore, FAP inhibitors (FAPis) have been recently developed for PET imaging and radioligand therapy, exploring the clinical application in different tumor sub-types. The present review aimed to describe recent developments on radiolabeled FAP inhibitors and evaluate the possible translation of this pan-tumoral approach in clinical practice. At present, the application of FAPi-PET has been explored mainly in single-center studies, generally performed in small and heterogeneous cohorts of oncological patients. However, preliminary results were promising, in particular in low FDG-avid tumors such as primary liver and gastro-entero-pancreatic cancer, or in regions with unfavorable tumor-to-background ratio at FDG-PET/CT (i.e. brain), as well as in radiotherapy planning of head and neck tumors. Further promising results have been obtained in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis, especially in ovarian and gastric cancer. Data regarding the theranostics approach are still limited at presents, and definitive conclusion about its efficacy cannot be drawn at present. Nevertheless, the use of FAPi-based radio-ligand to treat the TME has been evaluated in first-in-human studies and appears feasible. Although the pan-tumoral approach in molecular imaging showed promising results, its real impact in day-to-day clinical practice has yet to be confirmed, and multi-center, prospective studies powered for efficacy are needed.
Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is generally represented by low-FDG avidity, and [18F]FDG-PET/CT is not recommended to stage the primary tumor. However, its role to assess metastases is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT to correctly identify RCC lung metastases using histology as standard of truth. Records of 350 patients affected by RCC and with CT evidence of at least one lung nodule, were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were: a) histologically proven RCC; b) [18F]FDG-PET/CT performed prior to lung surgery; c) lung surgery with histological analysis of surgical specimens; d) complete follow-up available. A per-lesion analysis was performed, and diagnostic accuracy was reported as sensitivity and specificity, using histology as standard of truth. [18F]FDG-PET/CT semiquantitative parameters (Standardized Uptake Value [SUVmax], Metabolic Tumor Volume [MTV] and Total Lesion Glycolysis [TLG]) were collected for each lesion. Sixty-seven (n=67) patients with a total of 107 lesions were included: lung metastases from RCC were detected in 57/107 of cases, while 50/107 lesions were related to others lung malignancies. Applying a cut-off of SUVmax ≥2, the sensitivity and the specificity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for detect RCC lung metastases were 33.3% (95% CI: 21.4% - 47.1%) and 26% (95%CI: 14.6% - 40.3%), respectively. The analysis demonstrated sub-optimal diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT to discriminate between RCC lung metastases versus other malignancies. However, semiquantitative analysis including also volumetric parameters (MTV and TLG) can support [18F]FDG-PET/CT image interpretation.
Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is generally characterized by low-FDG avidity, and [18F]FDG-PET/CT is not recommended to stage the primary tumor. However, its role to assess metastases is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in correctly identifying RCC lung metastases using histology as the standard of truth. The records of 350 patients affected by RCC were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criteria were: (a) biopsy- or histologically proven RCC; (b) Computed Tomography (CT) evidence of at least one lung nodule; (c) [18F]FDG-PET/CT performed prior to lung surgery; (d) lung surgery with histological analysis of surgical specimens; (e) complete follow-up available. A per-lesion analysis was performed, and diagnostic accuracy was reported as sensitivity and specificity, using histology as the standard of truth. [18F]FDG-PET/CT semiquantitative parameters (Standardized Uptake Value [SUVmax], Metabolic Tumor Volume [MTV] and Total Lesion Glycolysis [TLG]) were collected for each lesion. Sixty-seven patients with a total of 107 lesions were included: lung metastases from RCC were detected in 57 cases (53.3%), while 50 lesions (46.7%) were related to other lung malignancies. Applying a cut-off of SUVmax ≥ 2, the sensitivity and the specificity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in detecting RCC lung metastases were 33.3% (95% CI: 21.4–47.1%) and 26% (95%CI: 14.6–40.3%), respectively. Although the analysis demonstrated a suboptimal diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in discriminating between lung metastases from RCC and other malignancies, a semiquantitative analysis that also includes volumetric parameters (MTV and TLG) could support the correct interpretation of [18F]FDG-PET/CT images.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.