DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

Purpose There is great interest in unobtrusive long-term sleep measurements using wearable devices based on reflective photoplethysmography (PPG). Unfortunately, consumer devices are not validated in patient populations and therefore not suitable for clinical use. Several sleep staging algorithms have been developed and validated based on ECG-signals. However, translation from these techniques to data derived by wearable PPG is not trivial, and requires the differences between sensing modalities to be integrated in the algorithm, or having the model trained directly with data obtained with the target sensor. Either way, validation of PPG-based sleep staging algorithms requires a large dataset containing both gold standard measurements and PPG-sensor in the applicable clinical population. Here, we take these important steps towards unobtrusive, long-term sleep monitoring. Methods We developed and trained an algorithm based on wrist-worn PPG and accelerometry. The method was validated against reference polysomnography in an independent clinical population comprising 244 adults and 48 children (age: 3 to 82 years) with a wide variety of sleep disorders. Results The classifier achieved substantial agreement on four-class sleep staging with an average Cohen’s kappa of 0.62 and accuracy of 76.4%. For children/adolescents, it achieved even higher agreement with an average kappa of 0.66 and accuracy of 77.9%. Performance was significantly higher in non-REM parasomnias (kappa = 0.69, accuracy = 80.1%) and significantly lower in REM parasomnias (kappa = 0.55, accuracy = 72.3%). A weak correlation was found between age and kappa ( ρ = −0.30, p<0.001) and age and accuracy ( ρ = −0.22, p<0.001). Conclusion This study shows the feasibility of automatic wearable sleep staging in patients with a broad variety of sleep disorders and a wide age range. Results demonstrate the potential for ambulatory long-term monitoring of clinical populations, which may improve diagnosis, estimation of severity and follow up in both sleep medicine and research.

Objectives To extend and validate a previously suggested model of the influence of uninterrupted sleep bouts on sleep onset misperception in a large independent data set. Methods Polysomnograms and sleep diaries of 139 insomnia patients and 92 controls were included. We modeled subjective sleep onset as the start of the first uninterrupted sleep fragment longer than Ls minutes, where parameter Ls reflects the minimum length of a sleep fragment required to be perceived as sleep. We compared the so-defined sleep onset latency (SOL) for various values of Ls. Model parameters were compared between groups, and across insomnia subgroups with respect to sleep onset misperception, medication use, age, and sex. Next, we extended the model to incorporate the length of wake fragments. Model performance was assessed by calculating root mean square errors (RMSEs) of the difference between estimated and perceived SOL. Results Participants with insomnia needed a median of 34 minutes of undisturbed sleep to perceive sleep onset, while healthy controls needed 22 minutes (Mann–Whitney U = 4426, p &lt; 0.001). Similar statistically significant differences were found between sleep onset misperceivers and non-misperceivers (median 40 vs. 20 minutes, Mann–Whitney U = 984.5, p &lt; 0.001). Model outcomes were similar across other subgroups. Extended models including wake bout lengths resulted in only marginal improvements of model outcome. Conclusions Patients with insomnia, particularly sleep misperceivers, need larger continuous sleep bouts to perceive sleep onset. The modeling approach yields a parameter for which we coin the term Sleep Fragment Perception Index, providing a useful measure to further characterize sleep state misperception.

Rationale The mechanisms underlying impaired sleep quality in insomnia are not fully known, but an important role for sleep fragmentation has been proposed. Objectives The aim of this study is to explore potential mechanisms of sleep fragmentation influencing alterations of perceived sleep quality. Methods We analyzed polysomnography (PSG) recordings from a double-blind crossover study with zopiclone 7.5 mg and placebo, in elderly participants with insomnia complaints and age-matched healthy controls. We compared survival dynamics of sleep and wake across group and treatment. Subsequently, we used a previously proposed model to estimate the amount of sleep onset latency (SOL) misperception from PSG-defined sleep fragmentation. Self-reported and model-estimated amount of SOL misperception were compared across group and treatment, as well as model prediction errors. Results In the zopiclone night, the average segment length of NREM sleep was increased (group F = 1.16, p = 0.32; treatment F = 8.89, p< 0.01; group x treatment F = 0.44, p = 0.65), while the segment length of wake was decreased (group F = 1.48, p = 0.23; treatment F = 11.49, p< 0.01; group x treatment F = 0.36, p = 0.70). The self-reported and model-estimated amount of SOL misperception were lower during the zopiclone night (self-reported group F = 6.08, p< 0.01, treatment F = 10.8, p< 0.01, group x treatment F = 2.49, p = 0.09; model-estimated F = 1.70, p = 0.19, treatment F = 16.1, p< 0.001, group x treatment F = 0.60, p = 0.55). The prediction error was not altered (group F = 1.62, p = 0.20; treatment F = 0.20, p = 0.65; group x treatment F = 1.01, p = 0.37). Conclusions Impaired subjective sleep quality is associated with decreased NREM stability, together with increased stability of wake. Furthermore, we conclude that zopiclone-induced changes in SOL misperception can be largely attributed to predictable changes of sleep architecture.

No abstract