The recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) challenges pharmacists worldwide. Alongside other specialized pharmacists, we re‐evaluated daily processes and therapies used to treat COVID‐19 patients within our institutions from a cardiovascular perspective and share what we have learned. To develop a collaborative approach for cardiology issues and concerns in the care of confirmed or suspected COVID‐19 patients by drawing on the experiences of cardiology pharmacists across the country. On March 26, 2020, a conference call was convened composed of 24 cardiology residency‐trained pharmacists (23 actively practicing in cardiology and 1 in critical care) from 16 institutions across the United States to discuss cardiology issues each have encountered with COVID‐19 patients. Discussion centered around providing optimal pharmaceutical care while limiting staff exposure. The collaborative of pharmacists found for the ST‐elevation myocardial infarction patient, many institutions were diverting COVID‐19 rule‐out patients to their Emergency Department (ED). Thrombolytics are an alternative to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) allowing for timely treatment of patients and decreased staff exposure. An emergency response grab and go kit includes initial drugs and airway equipment so the patient can be treated and the cart can be left outside the room. Cardiology pharmacists have developed policies and procedures to address monitoring of QT prolonging medications, the use of inhaled prostacyclins, and national drug shortages. Technology has allowed us to practice social distancing, while staying in close contact with our teams, patients, and colleagues and continuing to teach. Residents are engaged in unique decision‐making processes with their preceptors and assist as pharmacist extenders. Cardiology pharmacists are in a unique position to work with other pharmacists and health care professionals to implement safe and effective practice changes during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Ongoing monitoring and adjustments are necessary in rapidly changing times.
BACKGROUND Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is a treatment option for the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and other coagulation disorders. To date, no published studies have identified patients at risk for or the consequence of subtherapeutic bivalirudin therapy. OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to identify factors associated with failure to achieve early therapeutic anticoagulation (ETA) with bivalirudin, defined as achievement of two consecutive therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) within 24 hours. Secondary objectives included evaluating whether failure to achieve ETA was a risk factor for clinical outcomes of interest including thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and mortality. PATIENTS/METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients between the ages of 18 and 89 years treated with bivalirudin for 24 hours or longer were identified and classified as either achieving or failing to achieve ETA. RESULTS Nonadherence to the dosing protocol (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.71) and creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 60 ml/min or greater (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.12-7.97) were significantly associated with failure to achieve ETA in univariate analyses. Conversely, increasing age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99) was significantly associated with achievement of ETA. Failure to achieve ETA was associated with a 4-fold increase in the odds of thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS Younger age, normal renal function, and nonadherence to the dosing protocol when targeting therapeutic anticoagulation is associated with increased risk of failure to achieve ETA. This confers an elevated risk of thromboembolism when using bivalirudin for the management of HIT or other coagulation disorders.
Antithrombotic optimization with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor has been used for the treatment of suspected pump thrombosis, but available literature with tirofiban is lacking. This study aims to describe the use of tirofiban for suspected pump thrombosis. This was a single-center cohort study of left ventricular assist device patients who received tirofiban for the treatment of suspected pump thrombosis from January 1, 2016 to July 31, 2017. Tirofiban was initiated at 0.1 μg/kg/min in patients with normal renal function and subsequent dose adjustments for altered renal function or history of bleeding were employed. Success was defined as resolution of lactate dehydrogenase back to patients’ known baseline. Fourteen patients were included for 16 total instances of tirofiban use during the time period. Tirofiban was continued for a median of 5 days (range: 0.3–35 days). Successful treatment was achieved in 12 of the 16 tirofiban uses (75%). Seven bleeding events occurred while on therapy, two major and five minor. This study showed a majority of patients achieved success with tirofiban for suspected pump thrombosis. For patients who are not current candidates for pump exchange or transplant, tirofiban may be considered a therapeutic medical management option.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.