Bat flight poses intriguing questions about how flight independently developed in mammals. Flight is among the most energyconsuming activities. Thus, we deduced that changes in energy metabolism must be a primary factor in the origin of flight in bats. The respiratory chain of the mitochondrial produces 95% of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) needed for locomotion. Because the respiratory chain has a dual genetic foundation, with genes encoded by both the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes, we examined both genomes to gain insights into the evolution of flight within mammals. Evidence for positive selection was detected in 23.08% of the mitochondrial-encoded and 4.90% of nuclearencoded oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) genes, but in only 2.25% of the nuclear-encoded nonrespiratory genes that function in mitochondria or 1.005% of other nuclear genes in bats. To address the caveat that the two available bat genomes are of only draft quality, we resequenced 77 OXPHOS genes from four species of bats. The analysis of the resequenced gene data are in agreement with our conclusion that a significantly higher proportion of genes involved in energy metabolism, compared with background genes, show evidence of adaptive evolution specific on the common ancestral bat lineage. Both mitochondrial and nuclearencoded OXPHOS genes display evidence of adaptive evolution along the common ancestral branch of bats, supporting our hypothesis that genes involved in energy metabolism were targets of natural selection and allowed adaptation to the huge change in energy demand that were required during the origin of flight.Chiroptera | genetic foundation | mitochondria | OXPHOS B ats are perhaps the most unusual and specialized of all mammals, as flight is their main mode of locomotion. Although there are several gliding mammals that are able to glide from tree to tree (such as the flying squirrel, gliding possums, and colugos), bats are the only mammal capable of sustaining level flight (1). The evolution of flight in bats was a major factor leading to the success of this amazing group (2, 3). A number of adaptations to flight found in birds are not shared by mammals, thus Darwin in the Origin of Species (Chapter 5) (4) proposed that the evolution of a flying bat from an insectivorous terrestrial mammal was too difficult to imagine.Bat flight is a highly complex functional system from a morphological, physiological, and aerodynamic perspective (5). As in birds, bat flight requires a metabolic rate that is 3-5 times greater than the maximum observed during exercise in similar-sized terrestrial mammals (2, 6). Hence, a significant metabolic barrier must separate volant from nonvolant vertebrates (6). Therefore, we speculate that energy metabolism is among the primary factors that influenced the development of flight in bats.The respiratory chain of the mitochondrial produces 95% of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) needed for locomotion. The enzymes involved in oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) are composed of multisubunit complexes that a...

Beetles constitute the most biodiverse animal order with over 380 000 described species and possibly several million more yet unnamed. Recent phylogenomic studies have arrived at considerably incongruent topologies and widely varying estimates of divergence dates for major beetle clades. Here, we use a dataset of 68 single-copy nuclear protein-coding (NPC) genes sampling 129 out of the 193 recognized extant families as well as the first comprehensive set of fully justified fossil calibrations to recover a refined timescale of beetle evolution. Using phylogenetic methods that counter the effects of compositional and rate heterogeneity, we recover a topology congruent with morphological studies, which we use, combined with other recent phylogenomic studies, to propose several formal changes in the classification of Coleoptera: Scirtiformia and Scirtoidea sensu nov ., Clambiformia ser. nov. and Clamboidea sensu nov. , Rhinorhipiformia ser. nov ., Byrrhoidea sensu nov. , Dryopoidea stat. res. , Nosodendriformia ser. nov. and Staphyliniformia sensu nov ., and Erotyloidea stat. nov ., Nitiduloidea stat. nov . and Cucujoidea sensu nov., alongside changes below the superfamily level. Our divergence time analyses recovered a late Carboniferous origin of Coleoptera, a late Palaeozoic origin of all modern beetle suborders and a Triassic–Jurassic origin of most extant families, while fundamental divergences within beetle phylogeny did not coincide with the hypothesis of a Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution.

The ability of bats and toothed whales to echolocate is a remarkable case of convergent evolution. Previous genetic studies have documented parallel evolution of nucleotide sequences in Prestin and KCNQ4, both of which are associated with voltage motility during the cochlear amplification of signals. Echolocation involves complex mechanisms. The most important factors include cochlear amplification, nerve transmission, and signal re-coding. Herein, we screen three genes that play different roles in this auditory system. Cadherin 23 (Cdh23) and its ligand, protocadherin 15 (Pcdh15), are essential for bundling motility in the sensory hair. Otoferlin (Otof) responds to nerve signal transmission in the auditory inner hair cell. Signals of parallel evolution occur in all three genes in the three groups of echolocators—two groups of bats (Yangochiroptera and Rhinolophoidea) plus the dolphin. Significant signals of positive selection also occur in Cdh23 in the Rhinolophoidea and dolphin, and Pcdh15 in Yangochiroptera. In addition, adult echolocating bats have higher levels of Otof expression in the auditory cortex than do their embryos and non-echolocation bats. Cdh23 and Pcdh15 encode the upper and lower parts of tip-links, and both genes show signals of convergent evolution and positive selection in echolocators, implying that they may co-evolve to optimize cochlear amplification. Convergent evolution and expression patterns of Otof suggest the potential role of nerve and brain in echolocation. Our synthesis of gene sequence and gene expression analyses reveals that positive selection, parallel evolution, and perhaps co-evolution and gene expression affect multiple hearing genes that play different roles in audition, including voltage and bundle motility in cochlear amplification, nerve transmission, and brain function.