Introduction Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) complicated by multiple myeloma (MM) is a relatively rare clinical presentation, and is easily ignored due to their similar or even identical manifestation, which may lead to misdiagnosis and mistreatment. Case report We report two cases of SLE with MM. Case 1 was a 59‐year‐old male who was diagnosed with SLE 11 years ago. Abnormal kidney function was detected 4 months ago and a bone marrow aspirate revealed MM. He then received three cycles of bortezomib, dexamethasone, and chemotherapy with liposomal doxorubicin, and one cycle of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. He died of infectious shock. Case 2 was a 58‐year‐old female who was diagnosed with SLE 27 years ago. After the onset of abnormal renal function 4 years ago, the patient was still treated according to SLE disease activity. When renal function rapidly deteriorated, serum and urine immunofixation electrophoresis was positive for IgG γ with free light chains and she was diagnosed with SLE complicated by MM. She did not agree to the treatment for MM as advised and was discharged from the hospital against medical advice. Case 2 died of cardiac failure. Thirteen cases of SLE with MM reported from 2000 to 2022 in PUBMED and Mendeley and our above two cases were reviewed. Among the 15 patients, 13 were females and 2 were males. The median age at the time of SLE with MM diagnosis was 50 years, and the median time to a delayed diagnosis was 7 years. The serum monoclonal immunoglobulin level was elevated and extramedullary manifestations of renal dysfunction were common. Conclusions An elevated monoclonal immunoglobulin level or newly unexplained renal dysfunction occurring in a patient with SLE should prompt monitoring and further screening of MM, rather than treatment as a secondary manifestation of SLE.
Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate clinical features and prognostic factors of antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5)-positive dermatomyositis with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) in Chinese patients. Methods: Clinical features and prognostic factors of patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent dermatomyositis patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into the anti-MDA5-positive or negative dermatomyositis, and with or without RP-ILD groups. Clinical features and prognostic factors were statistically compared among different groups. Results: The serum ferritin (SF) levels (1500.0 [658.80, 1844.0]) and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) (125.5 [61.0, 232.0] vs. 28 [16.0, 41.0], Z = 5.528; p < .001) were markedly higher, and phosphocreatine myoenzyme (CK) (73.0 [42.0, 201.0] vs. 1333.0 [79.0, 8000.0], Z = −2.739, p = .006), serum albumin level (32.51 ± 5.23 vs. 35.81 ± 5.88, t = −2.542, p = .013), and lymphocyte count (0.80 ± 0.36 vs. 1.45 ± 0.77, t = −4.717, p < .001) were lower than those in anti-MDA5-negative counterparts. Among patients with anti-MDA5 antibody (Ab) with RP-ILD, the SF level (1531.0 [1163.8, 2016.5] vs. 584.9 [564.8, 1042.5], Z = 2.664, p = .008), γ-GT (134.0 [81.0, 204.5] vs. 123.0 [76.0, 189.0], Z = 3.136, p = .002) and positive rate of anti-RO-52 Ab (90.9% vs. 50.0%, χ 2 = 7.222, p = .013) were higher and lymphocyte count (0.79 ± 0.38 vs.1.32 ± 0.74, t = −3.025, p = .029) was lower than those in their counterparts without RP-ILD. The SF level of anti-MDA5 nonsurvivors (1544anti-MDA5 nonsurvivors ( [1447anti-MDA5 nonsurvivors ( .32, 2089anti-MDA5 nonsurvivors ( .0] vs. 584.9 [515.7, 1500.0], Z = 2.096, p = .030), anti-RO-52 Ab-positive rate ([16/18, 88.9%] vs. [9/16, 56.2%], χ 2 = 4.636, p = .031) were higher than those in survivors. Lymphocytopenia was a risk factor for RP-ILD and death of patients with anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis. The area under receiver
The high-dose glucocorticosteroid (GC) treatment is the first choice for dermatomyositis complicated with interstitial lung disease (DM-ILD) but patients are resistant to the high-dose GC monotherapy. Besides, the high dose of GC, the secondary immunosuppressive agent(s) is necessary but there is controversy for the selection of immunosuppressive agent(s). The objectives of the study were to analyze the efficacy of different therapeutic options for DM-ILD to identify the optimal therapy. A total of 60 patients had received intravenous 1.0–2.0 mg/ kg/day prednisolone for DM-ILD. In severe conditions, patients had received oral 1 to 3 mg/day tacrolimus (TAC), 500 mg/ m2/month cyclophosphamide (CY), and/or 1 g/ day methylprednisolone pulse (TI cohort, n = 24). In severe conditions, patients had received 1 g/day methylprednisolone pulse and 2–3 mg/ kg/day cyclosporine A (CsA) and/or 500 mg/ m2/month CY (existing historical treatment; CT cohort, n = 36). Patients of the TI cohort did not receive CsA. Patients in the CT cohort were received CY in significantly fewer numbers than those of the TI cohort during treatment (P = .0112). A total of 11 (46%) patients from the TI cohort and 14 (39%) patients from the CT cohort were developed relapsed. At the end of the 30-months, higher numbers of patients of the TI cohort had an event(s) free survival than those of the CT cohort (7 (29%) vs 2 (6%), P = .0229). Also, higher numbers of patients of the TI cohort had survived irrespective of an event(s) than those of the CT cohort (21 (87%) vs 22 (61%), P = .0399). Patients of the TI cohort had developed herpes zoster (2 (8%)) and cytomegalovirus (4 (17%)) infections. Patients of the CT cohort developed renal dysfunction (10 (28%)). Hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and fracture (GC-related toxicities) were also reported in both cohorts and these toxicities were fever in the TI cohort. The addition of TAC to high doses GC with CY is an ideal treatment for severe conditions of DM-ILD (Level of Evidence: III; Technical Efficacy Stage: 4).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.