Background: The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) older adult population may have a heightened need of medical and supportive care while aging. This makes appointment of a healthcare power of attorney (HCPoA) an essential component of end-of-life care to ensure patients’ wishes are honored at the end of their lives. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and preferences for HCPoA appointment among older LGBTQ adults living in the Southern United States. Methods: An online survey was distributed to older LGBTQ adults living in the Southern US regarding appointment of a HCPoA between January-March 2018. Participants: The survey was completed by 789 older LGBTQ adults from North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Florida in January-March 2018. Results: Overall, 61.6% of respondents had appointed a HCPoA. Respondents with an appointed HCPoA were more likely to be married (aOR = 5.04, p < .001), have larger social networks (aOR = 3.87, p < .001) and be older (aOR = 1.07, p < .001). Gender diverse respondents were less likely to have an appointed HCPoA relative to cisgender respondents (aOR = 0.39, p = .04). Overall, the majority of respondents indicated a spouse or significant other served as their HCPoA ( n = 311, 64.5%). Conclusions: Nearly 40% of older LGBTQ adults in the Southern US did not have an appointed HCPoA. Specifically, those who were more socially isolated, single, or who identified as transgender or gender non-binary were less likely to have an appointed HCPoA. These people may benefit from targeted outreach regarding advance care planning.

The number of older adults in the United States is projected to increase in coming years, including the number of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or questioning (LGBTQ+) older adults requiring long-term care (LTC) services. We conducted an online survey of older LGBTQ+ adults living in the Southern United States between January and March of 2018 to inquire about their anticipation of discrimination in and willingness to utilize LTC services. We found that 78.6% of respondents ( N = 789) anticipated discrimination in LTC. Previous experiences with discrimination, higher educational attainment, and queer/questioning sexual orientation were associated with greater expectation of discrimination. Higher anticipation of discrimination was also associated with a greater preference for utilizing LTC services offered by LGBTQ+ providers or for LGBTQ+ older adults. These findings suggest that LTC staff and researchers may be uniquely positioned to craft outreach and policies to protect LGBTQ+ LTC residents.

No abstract

BackgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can colonize up to 14.5% of healthcare workers (HCWs). The colonization rate of HCWs or the hospital setting that contributes most to MRSA colonization is less clear. In this study, we studied new resident physicians (PGY-1), as a model for HCWs, to measure their colonization rate and hypothesized that the incidence of colonization would increase during their first year. MethodologyWe prospectively enrolled PGY-1 residents of multiple specialties at three academic medical centers. After obtaining informed consent, PGY-1 residents were tested for MRSA in June 2019 before starting any clinical rotations and then retested every three to four months thereafter. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic forced us to end the study early. If MRSA-positive, residents were treated with 2% mupirocin and retested for a cure. For comparison, upper-level residents (PGY-2-5) were also enrolled to obtain a baseline prevalence of colonization. ResultsWe enrolled 80 PGY-1 and 81 PGY-2-5 residents in the study. The baseline prevalence of MRSA colonization was 4.94% (4/81) in PGY-2-5 residents and 2.50% (2/80) for new PGY-1 residents; however, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). The cumulative yearly incidence of developing MRSA colonization in PGY-1 residents was 4.51%. MRSA colonization was successfully treated in 75% of cases. ConclusionsPGY-1 residents had a lower MRSA colonization rate compared to PGY-2-5 residents, although this was not statistically significant. PGY-1 residents had a small incidence of developing MRSA colonization while working in the hospital. Further research is needed to determine if this is clinically relevant to HCWs or their patients.