BackgroundThe management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved rapidly, and results from the Cancer du Rein Metastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques (CARMENA) trial bring into question the utility of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). The objective of this study was to examine overall survival (OS) and identify risk factors associated with patients less likely to benefit from CN in the targeted therapy era.MethodsPatients with mRCC undergoing CN from 2005 to 2017 were identified. Kaplan‐Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to assess OS and risk‐stratify patients, respectively, on the basis of preoperative clinical and laboratory data.ResultsSix hundred eight patients were eligible with a median follow‐up of 29.4 months. Ninety‐five percent of the patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1, and 70% had a single site of metastatic disease. In a multivariable analysis, risk factors significantly associated with decreased OS included systemic symptoms at diagnosis, retroperitoneal and supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy, bone metastasis, clinical T4 disease, a hemoglobin level less than the lower limit of normal (LLN), a serum albumin level less than the LLN, a serum lactate dehydrogenase level greater than the upper limit of normal, and a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio greater than or equal to 4. Patients were stratified into 3 risk groups: low (fewer than 2 risk factors), intermediate (2‐3 risk factors), and high (more than 3 risk factors). These groups had median OS of 58.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.3‐66.6 months), 30.6 months (95% CI, 27.0‐35.0 months), and 19.2 months (95% CI, 13.9‐22.6 months), respectively (P < .0001). The median time to postoperative systemic therapy was 45 days (interquartile range, 30‐90 days).ConclusionsPatients with more than 3 risk factors did not seem to benefit from CN. Importantly, OS in this group was equivalent to, if not higher than, OS for patients in the CN plus sunitinib arm of CARMENA, and this raises the possibility that a well‐selected population might benefit from CN.

BACKGROUND: Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (PC-RPLND) is an essential, yet potentially morbid, therapy for the management of patients with advanced germ cell tumors. In the current study, the authors sought to define the complication profile of PC-RPLND using validated grading systems for intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) and early postoperative complications. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2018, all patients who underwent PC-RPLND were analyzed for iAEs and early postoperative complications using the Kaafarani and Clavien-Dindo classifications, respectively. Logistic regression models were conducted to assess patient and tumor factors associated with iAEs and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Of the 453 patients identified, 115 patients (25%) and 252 patients (56%), respectively, experienced an iAE and postoperative complication. Major iAEs (grade ≥3) were observed in 15 patients (3%) and major postoperative complications (grade ≥3) were noted in 80 patients (18%). The most common iAE was vascular injury (112 of 132 events; 85%), which occurred in 92 patients (20%), and the most frequent postoperative complication was ileus, which occurred in 121 patients (27%). Original and postchemotherapy retroperitoneal mass size, nonretroperitoneal metastases, intermediate and/or poor International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification, previous RPLND, elevated tumor markers at the time of RPLND, and anticipated adjuvant surgical procedures increased the risk of both iAEs and postoperative complications. Patients who experienced an iAE were significantly more likely to experience a postoperative complication (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-3.97 [P < .001]). CONCLUSIONS: In what to the authors' knowledge is the first analysis of PC-RPLND using validated classifications for both iAEs and postoperative complications, advanced disease and surgical complexity significantly increased the risks of major iAEs and postoperative complications. Standardized reporting of adverse perioperative events allows providers and patients to appreciate the consequences of PC-RPLND during counseling and decision making.

Testosterone is an archetypal androgenic-anabolic steroid (AAS), while its exogenous administration is considered to be the gold standard for the treatment of male hypogonadism. The benefits are not due to its intrinsic nature alone but are due to the result of its interactions with the androgen receptor (AR). As the management of hypogonadism continues to advance into the modern era, it would be preferable for modern andrologists to have multiple tools at their disposal to influence AR activity. Nandrolone, or 19-nortestosterone, is one such compound. In the following review of the literature, we examine the history, pharmacology, and clinical applications of this medication. We also present the results of our novel pilot study examining the favorable effects of nandrolone on joint pain for hypogonadal men.

No abstract