Race and income have substantial effects on mortality and use of services among Medicare beneficiaries. Providing health insurance is not enough to ensure that the program is used effectively and equitably by all beneficiaries.
Asthma severity and level of asthma control are two related, but conceptually distinct, concepts that are often confused in the literature. We report on an index of asthma control developed for use in population-based disease management. This index was measured on 5,181 adult members of a large health maintenance organization (HMO), as were various self-reported measures of health care utilization (HCU) and quality of life (QOL). A simple index of number of control problems, ranging from none through four, exhibited marked and highly significant cross-sectional associations with self- reported HCU and with both generic and disease-specific QOL instruments, suggesting that each of the four dimensions of asthma control represented by these problems correlates with clinically significant impairment. Qualitatively similar results were found for control problems assessed relative to the past month and relative to the past year. Asthma control is an important "vital sign" that may be useful both for population-based disease management as well as for the management of individual patients.
Antibiotics are frequently prescribed for aged nursing home patients, often in the absence of a physician's examination and other features commonly performed in evaluation of specific infectious diseases. More than one-fifth of antibiotics prescribed by presumed active infections were for two infections usually thought not to require antibiotic therapy, "viral" upper respiratory infection (13%) and asymptomatic bacteriuria (9%). To optimize antibiotic use in nursing homes, greater attention should be directed to appropriate durations of prophylaxis for urologic, dental, and minor surgical procedures; to standards for diagnostic evaluations of common infections; and to the roles of antibiotics in upper respiratory infections and in asymptomatic bacteriuria.
The purpose of this review was to focus on hospital admissions caused by a specific type of adverse drug reaction (ADR) that can be assumed to be avoidable in almost all cases: the drug-drug interaction (D-DI). To determine the epidemiology of D-DIs in hospital admissions, a review of the adverse drug reaction literature was undertaken to answer several questions: (a) what is the incidence of hospital admissions attributable to D-DIs?; (b) what percentage of drug-related hospital admissions are attributable to D-DIs?; (c) are there any patterns to the above findings, i.e. are some D-DIs or specific drugs more likely to have been associated with hospital admissions?; and (d) are there certain patient risk factors (e.g. age) that are associated with D-DIs that led to a hospital admission? Nine ADR studies were found that either included a D-DI category as a cause for hospital admissions, or provided sufficient information so that a causal relationship could be inferred. The incidence of hospital admissions due to D-DIs ranged from 0 to 2.8%. The data found in the studies we reviewed, however, were insufficient to allow meaningful quantification of specific drugs as usual causes for D-DI-related admissions, and because of the very small numbers of patients for which a D-DI was believed to be the cause it is not possible to provide a meaningful summary of risk factors specific for D-DI admissions. We cannot conclude that D-DIs are a significant problem. There is a need to view the quantification of D-DIs in relation to the number of medications prescribed by physicians, dispensed by pharmacists and taken by patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.