Objective: Psychosocial distress among cancer patients leads to poor health outcomes and lower satisfaction. However, little is known about psychosocial distress among disadvantaged populations. We examined the prevalence, predictors, and follow-up experience of psychosocial distress among cancer patients within a diverse, urban, and multilingual safety-net setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of cancer patients undergoing psychosocial distress screening at initial medical oncology visits from 2014-2016. The primary outcome was self-reported moderate to severe psychosocial distress, defined by the NCCN as a Distress Thermometer score ≥ 4. Predictors of distress were assessed using logistic regression. Patients reporting distress were contacted by telephone 1-12 months later to reassess distress and assess completion of supportive service referrals. Results: Among 200 screened patients, 61% had moderate to severe psychosocial distress. African-American race, psychiatric illness, greater number of emotional problems, and reported problems with housing, money, worry, sleep, memory or homelessness were associated with psychosocial distress. Among 39 patients with moderate to severe psychosocial distress who completed follow-up (42% of eligible patients), mean distress scores decreased from 6.5 at screening to 4.5 at follow-up (P < .02). 56% of the supportive service referrals made at the initial visit were not completed. Conclusions: Cancer patients in the safety-net experience more psychosocial distress than other populations, with persistently elevated distress levels and difficulty accessing supportive services. We identified subgroups that may be at higher risk for psychosocial distress. Closer follow-up and assistance for patients who report high distress levels may be needed.
91 Background: Recognizing that psychosocial distress (PSD) is underestimated in patients with cancer, the Commission on Cancer mandated screening using a validated tool. Studies of PSD screening exist, but none to date in a diverse, multicultural safety net setting where patients face challenges such as homelessness, mental illness, and substance abuse, which may augment PSD. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer offered PSD screening during 2015. Overall distress scores and problems in each domain were analyzed. Chart review identified potential predictors of distress including age, gender, race, language, housing, psychiatric illness, substance abuse, and cancer stage. Results: Of 177 eligible patients, 113 (64%) completed screening. The most common reasons patients were not screened were refusal, too symptomatic (physically or emotionally), or language barriers. Of screened patients, 40.7% were female, 57.5% male, and 1.7% transgender. 31% were Caucasian, 27% Asian/Pacific Islander, 25% Hispanic, and 17% African American. 35% were non-English speaking. 29% had history of mental illness and 34% of substance abuse. 23% were marginally housed or homeless. 63% reported moderate to severe levels of PSD as defined by the NCCN as ≥ 4. Patients with mental illness were nearly twice as likely to report PSD ≥ 4 (p = 0.012) and had higher mean PSD scores (5.78 vs. 4.03, p = 0.002). English speaking patients had a mean PSD score of 5.01 compared to 3.6 and 3.2 for Spanish and Chinese speaking patients, respectively (p = 0.02 for English v. Chinese) and more domains causing PSD (p = 0.028 for English v. Chinese). Lack of stable housing also correlated with more domains causing PSD (p = 0.05). Conclusions: This proved to be an ethnically diverse cohort with high rates of mental illness, substance abuse, and homelessness, with the majority reporting moderate to severe distress. Even with a small cohort, English language and mental illness were significant predictors of PSD, and housing status correlated with more domains contributing to PSD. Several other variables trended toward significance, suggesting a larger cohort may be needed to determine if additional characteristics predict higher levels of PSD.
128 Background: Studies have suggested that uninsured and Medicaid patients are more likely to present with late-stage cancer than Medicare patients, and may be more likely to be admitted urgently or emergently. However, studies of palliative care interventions for cancer patients suggest that the greatest impact can be achieved if these services begin “early” (≥ 90 days prior to death). In our urban public hospital, we examined where patients receive their initial cancer diagnosis, and at what stage they are diagnosed, in order to determine how to best implement community-based palliative care services. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of cancer patients diagnosed over a five year period. Hospital tumor registry data were used to determine the location of diagnosis (inpatient vs. outpatient), stage and type of cancer at diagnosis, and patient status at the end of the study period (alive vs. deceased). Results: Of the 2,928 patients diagnosed with cancer, 26% of patients (n = 759) were diagnosed while hospitalized. Patients who received their diagnosis while hospitalized were more likely to be diagnosed with stage 3-4 disease (49%, n = 372), vs. stage 0-1 (21%, n = 163). 25% of patients who received their diagnosis in the inpatient setting died within 90 days of initial diagnosis. Patients diagnosed in the outpatient setting were more likely to be diagnosed with stage 0-1 (40%, n = 865), vs. stage 3-4 (32%, n = 688). Patients diagnosed while hospitalized were 2.9 times more likely to be diagnosed with late stage disease, compared to those diagnosed as outpatients (95% CI 2.3-3.5, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: A large minority of patients received their cancer diagnosis while hospitalized, and were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease. Additionally, a significant proportion of these patients died within 90 days of their initial diagnosis. In order to provide "early" palliative care for cancer patients in public hospitals, palliative care programs may need to offer initial consultation visits while patients are hospitalized, and then connect them with prompt outpatient follow-up. Safety net programs with palliative care services for cancer patients should emphasize continuity across inpatient and outpatient settings.
114 Background: The Commission on Cancer mandates psychosocial distress screening for patients with cancer, as well as documentation of referrals made to address sources of distress. Patients in safety net settings, who are vulnerable to significant economic and social stressors, may benefit from such screening; however, it is unclear if patients can access needed services and if their needs change over time. We examined the experience of cancer patients in an urban safety-net healthcare system to identify areas of improvement in the provision of support services. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients screened for psychosocial distress during 2015. We reviewed medical records from initial oncology visits for results of screening and referrals made at that time. Those who reported a distress score of ≥ 4 were eligible for telephone follow up, which occurred 1-12 months after initial screening. Patients who agreed to participate completed a telephone survey that assessed current distress and referral status. Results: Of 113 patients who completed a psychosocial distress screen, 60% (n=68) reported a distress score of ≥ 4 and were called for follow up. Of these 68 patients, 17 (25%) had died or enrolled in hospice, 16 (25%) could not be reached after 3 attempts, 7 (10%) had transferred care, and 1 declined to participate. 26 patients (38%) completed telephone follow up. Patients reported an average distress score of 3.8, compared to 6.2 at their first visit. While “worry” was the most commonly reported problem at baseline, “pain” was the most common problem at follow up. For these 26 patients, a total of 69 referrals were made at their first visit, 59% of which were not accessed. 58% of the reasons given for not accessing referrals cited factors other than lack of interest, including requiring more information, not hearing back from the organization, and transportation issues. Conclusions: Significant barriers, such as difficulty with referrals and follow up, may interfere with providing care to a diverse, underserved population of patients who report high levels of distress at their first oncology visits. Alternative approaches, including primary or specialty palliative care, may be needed in this population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.