Traditionally, the evaluation of cardiac function has focused on systolic function; however, there is a growing appreciation for the contribution of diastolic function to overall cardiac health. Given the emerging interest in evaluating diastolic function in all models of heart failure, there is a need for sensitivity, accuracy, and precision in the hemodynamic assessment of diastolic function. Hemodynamics measure cardiac pressures in vivo, offering a direct assessment of diastolic function. In this review, we summarize the underlying principles of diastolic function, dividing diastole into two phases: 1) relaxation and 2) filling. We identify parameters used to comprehensively evaluate diastolic function by hemodynamics, clarify how each parameter is obtained, and consider the advantages and limitations associated with each measure. We provide a summary of the sensitivity of each diastolic parameter to loading conditions. Furthermore, we discuss differences that can occur in the accuracy of diastolic and systolic indices when generated by automated software compared with custom software analysis and the magnitude each parameter is influenced during inspiration with healthy breathing and a mild breathing load, commonly expected in heart failure. Finally, we identify key variables to control (e.g., body temperature, anesthetic, sampling rate) when collecting hemodynamic data. This review provides fundamental knowledge for users to succeed in troubleshooting and guidelines for evaluating diastolic function by hemodynamics in experimental models of heart failure.
Cardiovascular and respiratory systems are anatomically and functionally linked; inspiration produces negative intrathoracic pressures that act on the heart and alter cardiac function. Inspiratory pressures increase with heart failure and can exceed the magnitude of ventricular pressure during diastole. Accordingly, respiratory pressures may be a confounding factor to assessing cardiac function. While the interaction between respiration and the heart is well characterized, the extent to which systolic and diastolic indices are affected by inspiration is unknown. Our objective was to understand how inspiratory pressure affects the hemodynamic assessment of cardiac function. To do this, we developed custom software to assess and separate indices of systolic and diastolic function into inspiratory, early expiratory, and late expiratory phases of respiration. We then compared cardiac parameters during normal breathing and with various respiratory loads. Variations in inspiratory pressure had a small impact on systolic pressure and function. Conversely, diastolic pressure strongly correlated with negative inspiratory pressure. Cardiac pressures were less affected by respiration during expiration; late expiration was the most stable respiratory phase. In conclusion, inspiration is a large confounding influence on diastolic pressure, but minimally affects systolic pressure. Performing cardiac hemodynamic analysis by accounting for respiratory phase yields more accuracy and analytic confidence to the assessment of diastolic function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.