A common feature of research investigating the placebo effect is deception of research participants about the nature of the research. Miller and colleagues examine the ethical issues surrounding such deception.
The Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) (Rosenstiel and Keefe 1983) is the most widely used measure of pain coping strategies. To date, with one exception (Tuttle et al. 1991), studies examining the factor structure of the CSQ have used the composite scores of its 8 a-priori theoretically derived scales rather than the 48 individual items. An examination of the match between the 8 theoretically derived scales and scales empirically extracted from an item analysis is lacking. Accordingly, the CSQ was administered to 126 chronic pain (whiplash) patients. Factor analyses of the individual items revealed an 8-factor structure to be uninterpretable. Of the 2-9-factor solutions tested, the 5-factor structure was the most interpretable: Factor 1, Distraction; Factor 2, Ignoring Pain Sensations; Factor 3, Reinterpreting Pain Sensations; Factor 4, Catastrophizing; Factor 5, Praying and Hoping. Eighteen Ph.D. or M.D. level clinicians classified items into their corresponding category with a high degree of accuracy (on average, 90.2%), attesting to the face and construct validity of the subscales. Four subscales, Catastrophizing, Reinterpreting Pain Sensations, Praying and Hoping and (to a lesser degree) Ignoring Pain Sensations, correspond with parallel subscales proposed by Rosensteil and Keefe (1983). The fifth subscale, Distraction, is comprised of items from their Diverting Attention and Increasing Activity Level subscales, suggesting that cognitive and behavioural distraction comprise 1 rather than 2 coping strategies. That CSQ items on the original Coping Self-Statements and the Increasing Pain Behaviour subscales failed to load consistently on any factor suggests that they do not reliably measure distinct coping strategies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The hot flush (or flash) is the most widely reported menopausal symptom. Anecdotal reports suggest that women experience more hot flushes when stressed. Although stress may actually trigger hot flushes, another possibility is that women under stress may be more aware of the physiological changes associated with flushes and, therefore, more likely to report them. The goal of this study was to test these hypotheses by investigating the association between stress and both objective (i.e., physiologically recorded) and subjective hot flushes. Twenty-one postmenopausal women who reported having frequent hot flushes each underwent psychophysiological monitoring during stressful and nonstressful laboratory sessions. Significantly more objective flushes were recorded during the stress session than during the nonstress session. The stress manipulation, however, did not affect subjects' propensity to report flushes. These results suggest that the observed association between reported hot flushes and stress is not due to changes in report bias. The physiological mechanisms through which stress may stimulate hot flushes are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.