The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced healthcare providers worldwide to adapt their practices. Our understanding of the effects of COVID-19 has increased exponentially since the beginning of the pandemic. Data from large-scale, international registries has provided more insight regarding risk factors for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and has allowed us to delineate specific subgroups of patients that have higher risks for severe complications. One particular subset of patients that have significantly higher risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection with higher morbidity and mortality rates are those that require surgical treatment for lung cancer. Earlier studies have shown that COVID-19 infections in patients that underwent lung cancer surgery is associated with higher rates of respiratory failure and mortality. However, deferral of cancer treatments is associated with increased mortality as well. This creates difficult situations in which healthcare providers are forced to weigh the benefits of surgical treatment against the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 infections. A number of oncological and surgical organizations have proposed treatment guidelines and recommendations for patients planned for lung cancer surgery. In this review, we summarize the latest data and recommendations for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery in the COVID-19 circumstance.
Introduction: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive form of breast cancer (BC) in which the (prognostic) role of stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) and the peripheral circulating immune cells in patients with residual disease (RD) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not clearly established. Methodology: To describe the evolution of sTIL and some peripheral inflammation markers (Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio) after NACT in IBC, we retrospectively collected clinicopathological variables for 125 stage III IBC patients. sTILs were scored by three different researchers on an H&E slide of the mastectomy specimen. A cohort of subtype-matched non-IBC breast cancer patients (nIBC) treated with NACT was included for comparison. Results: There was no significant difference in the pre- and posttreatment sTIL scores between IBC and nIBC and in both groups the number of sTIL was significantly lower after NACT. However, the IBC phenotype did correlate with a stronger decrease of sTIL after NACT (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.073–0.76, p = 0.018). The change in the peripheral immune markers was not significantly different between IBC and nIBC. After NACT, 75 patients had residual disease. In this group, a high number of sTIL before NACT (HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.05–1.02, p = 0.05) was prognostic for a longer OS, while a low number of sTIL after NACT (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11–0.98, p = 0.046) and a low residual cancer cellularity (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.08–0.52, p < 0.001) was associated with a longer DFS. Conclusions: IBC is associated with a significantly stronger decrease of sTIL after NACT compared to nIBC. Furthermore, a high number of sTIL after NACT was associated with a worse prognosis in IBC.
Introduction: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare, but aggressive form of breast cancer. Increasing evidence indicates that immune cells in the tumor micro-environment play an important role in IBC progression: infiltration with stromal Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTIL) is associated with a better response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and longer overall survival in IBC patients. However, the prognostic role of sTIL in patients without a complete pathological response (pCR) after NACT remains unclear. In this study we evaluated the effect of NACT on sTIL in IBC and locally advanced non-inflammatory breast cancer (LABC) and the prognostic impact of sTIL in IBC. Methodology: In this retrospective case-control study we evaluated sTIL in patients with IBC (n=60) and LABC (n= 134) that received anthracyclin-taxane based NACT. Tumor tissue was sampled as part of the routine work-up, before (diagnostic biopsy) and after (resection specimen) NACT. sTIL scoring was performed on Haematoxylin & Eosin stained 5-µm sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue by two different researchers according to the recommendations by the International TILs Working Group. In case of discrepancy, the sample was scored by a third observer in order to obtain a consensus score. sTIL difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment specimen was called δsTIL. Cellularity of the residual cancer after NACT was evaluated according to the MD Anderson Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) method. Results: Most of the IBC patients presented with a hormone receptor (HR) positive carcinoma (n=35/60, 58.3%) and 25 patients had pCR after NACT (42%); the latter patients had less than 1% sTIL in the tumor bed area. Besides having histologically more poorly differentiated tumors (P= 0.033), no significant clinicopathological differences between the IBC and LABC cohort were observed. There was no significant difference in the pre-treatment median sTIL score between IBC (12.5%, range: 1% - 80%) and LABC (10%, range: 1% - 85%). Furthermore, both in the IBC (median δsTIL: -4.5%, P= 0.01) and in the LABC (median δsTIL: -1%, P= 0.06) cohort the number of sTIL was lower after NACT. This decrease was significantly greater in the IBC cohort (P= 0.04). In a multivariate model - including HR and HER2 status, histological differentiation grade, nodal status and IBC/LABC phenotype - IBC disease correlated with a stronger decrease of sTILs after NACT (OR: 0.31, 95% CI 0.10 - 0.89, P= 0.04). As we previously demonstrated, higher sTIL score before NACT was associated with better overall survival (OS) (P= 0.006) in IBC. IBC patients without pCR, but with a stronger decrease (> 4.5 %) of the number of sTIL after NACT had a better OS (P= 0.04) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P= 0.04). There was a significant correlation between δsTIL and both higher sTIL score before NACT (P< .001) and lower residual cancer cellularity (P= 0.02). However, in a multivariate model - including sTIL before NACT, δsTIL and residual cancer cellularity - both a strong decrease of sTIL (HR: 0.32; 95% CI 0.10 - 1.00; P= 0.05) and a low residual cancer cellularity (HR: 0.22; 95% CI 0.07 - 0.68; P= 0.009) were independent predictors of a better DFS. Conclusion: Both the IBC and LABC cohort had the same number of sTIL before NACT. However, the IBC phenotype was associated with a stronger decrease of sTIL after NACT independent of molecular subtype and nodal stage. Furthermore, a strong decrease in sTIL was an independent predictor of better prognosis in IBC. Citation Format: Christophe Van Berckelaer, Leonie Vercauteren, Iris Vermeiren, Glenn Broeckx, Steven Van Laere, Luc Dirix, Cecile Colpaert, Peter Van Dam. The prognostic role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes after treatment with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in inflammatory breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS17-13.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.