No abstract

No abstract

Objective: Midface retrusion is a concern in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP). Maxillary segment alignment may influence the prognosis after corrective surgery. This study assessed the association between maxillary segment alignment and interarch relationship observed in the early mixed dentition. The null hypothesis was that there is no relation between the initial alignment of cleft segments and the width of the cleft in the infant, and the early mixed dentition interarch relationship. Setting and Sample Population: The sample consists of 352 children with CUCLP treated at the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies/USP. Material And Methods: Dental models were obtained before lip repair at three months and at the age of six. Based on the first, the sample was then divided into two groups: anteroposterior aligned and anteroposterior misaligned maxillary segments. They were also divided into 4 groups according to the cleft width (Narrow, Medium, Wide and Very Wide). Interarch relationship was graded using the 5-year-old index. The statistical association was evaluated using the chi-squared test (P < .05). Results: Cleft width was inversely related to interarch relationship in the early mixed dentition phase. Interarch relationship at the age of six was more favourable in children with misaligned maxillary segments than in children with aligned segments (P = .048). Conclusion: Five-year interarch relationship in patients with CUCLP is related to the anteroposterior relationship of infant maxillary segments and initial cleft width before primary surgeries. Wide alveolar clefts and sagittally aligned maxillary segments showed a worse interarch relationship in the early mixed dentition.

Objective: To compare the dentoskeletal effects of rapid (RME) and slow (SME) maxillary expansion in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Materials and Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT). Forty-six patients (34 male, 12 female) with BCLP and posterior crossbite (mean age of 9.2 years) were randomly assigned to two study groups. Group RME comprised subjects treated with Haas/Hyrax expander. Group SME included patients treated with quad-helix appliance. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before expansion (T1) and after appliance removal at the end of a 6-month retention period (T2) for a previous RCT that compared the transverse skeletal effects of RME and SME. CBCT-derived cephalometric images were generated and cephalometric analysis was performed using Dolphin Imaging Software (Chatsworth, Calif). Intergroup comparisons were performed using t tests (P &lt; .05). Results: Baseline forms were similar between groups. No significant differences between RME and SME groups were found. Conclusions: Rapid and slow maxillary expansion produced similar sagittal and vertical changes in patients with BCLP. Both Haas/Hyrax and quad-helix appliances can be used in patients with vertical facial pattern. Clinical relevance: RME and SME can be equally indicated in the treatment of maxillary arch constriction in patients with BCLP.

No abstract