A survey is given of the wide range of different materials and organisms that can be classi®ed as biopesticides. Details are given of those currently of commercial importance, and future developments in this area are discussed. It is considered that, while in the immediate future biopesticides may continue to be limited mainly to niche and speciality markets, there is great potential for long-term development and growth, both in their own right and in providing leads in other areas of pest management science.

Many compounds derived from living organisms have found a use in crop protection. These compounds have formed the basis of chemical synthesis programmes to derive new chemical products; they have been used to identify new biochemical modes of action that can be exploited by industry-led discovery programmes; some have been used as starting materials for semi-synthetic derivatives; and many have been used or continue to be used directly as crop protection agents. This review examines only those compounds derived from living organisms that are currently used as pesticides. Plant growth regulators and semiochemicals have been excluded from the review, as have living organisms that exert their effects by the production of biologically active secondary metabolites.

No abstract

No abstract

When cultured sycamore cells are homogenised in a phosphate‐citrate buffer at pH 7.0 and the homogenate centrifuged two fractions are obtained both of which show the presence of an acid (opt. pH 4.0–4.5) and a neutral (opt. pH 7.0–7.4) invertase. The activity of the insoluble pellet appears to be located in its cell wall fragments. The acid and neutral invertases of the soluble fraction can be separated by fractional precipitation with (NH4SO4. The activities of these enzymes are low in stationary phase cells but they increase following subculture to reach peaks of activity towards the end of the period of most active cell growth and division and then decline again as the cells begin to enter stationary phase. The activities of both enzymes are higher in the cell wall than in the soluble fraction and the acid invertase reaches higher levels of activity than the neutral enzyme in both fractions. When cells are subcultured there occurs within a few hours an increase in the acid invertase and a decline in the neutral invertase activity in the cell wall fraction and a decline in the acid invertase of the soluble fraction prior to the large net increases in the activities of both enzymes in both locations which occurs as the cells embark upon cell division. The pattern of changes in the invertase activities through the growth cycle of batch propagated cultures is similar whether the cells are grown in sucrose, or glucose, or sucrose plus glucose; the highest levels of activities were recorded in the glucose‐grown cells. The total yield of invertase activities and the distribution of activities between the soluble and cell wall fractions of the homogenates are affected by the pH of the extraction medium (within the range pH 4.0–8.0). It has not proved possible to completely remove the invertases from the cell wall fraction; upwards of 50 % of the acid invertase was recovered from this fraction by treatment with Triton‐X followed by urea, but these treatments inactivated a high proportion of the neutral enzyme. These findings are compared with other studies on the activity and intra‐cellular distribution of plant invertases and the possible roles of these enzymes discussed.