Whether and how long-term energy and climate targets can be reached depend on a range of interlinked factors: technology, economy, environment, policy, and society at large. Integrated assessment models of climate change or energy-system models have limited representations of societal transformations, such as behavior of various actors, transformation dynamics in time, and heterogeneity across and within societies. After reviewing the state of the art, we propose a research agenda to guide experiments to integrate more insights from social sciences into models: (1) map and assess societal assumptions in existing models, (2) conduct empirical research on generalizable and quantifiable patterns to be integrated into models, and (3) build and extensively validate modified or new models. Our proposed agenda offers three benefits: interdisciplinary learning between modelers and social scientists, improved models with a more complete representation of multifaceted reality, and identification of new and more effective solutions to energy and climate challenges.

In the last decade, a new strand of energy and climate research emerged that links quantitative models and socio-technical transitions theories or frameworks. Linking the two enables capturing the co-evolution of society, technology, the economy and the environment. We systematically review this literature (N = 44) and describe the papers' trends, scope, temporal and spatial foci, and methodological strategies. The reviewed literature aspires to find solutions to the energy and climate challenges, to increase realism in models and theories, and to enable interdisciplinary learning between the two scholarly communities. The outcomes in this literature show benefits of interdisciplinary learning between modellers and transitions theorists. However, the literature rarely identified practical insights for energy and climate solutions or for improving realism in models and theories. We conclude by suggesting that integrative research should be continued, but redirected to provide more practical outcomes to meet energy and climate targets. Research Highlights• Energy and climate papers that link models and socio-technical transitions theories or theoretical frameworks are reviewed. • Three aims are identified: Solutions to energy and climate challenges, increasing realism, and interdisciplinary learning. • Most studies demonstrate substantial benefits of interdisciplinary learning.• Few studies demonstrate concrete findings on how to meet climate and energy targets or to improve realism of models.• We suggest redirecting such integrative research to provide more practical outcomes to meet energy and climate targets.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

18.04.19, 10)01 Entre finitude et infinitude : le paradoxe de lʼingénierie climatique | Cairn.info

No abstract

No abstract