This article engages in the discussion of homonormativity in gay cultural politics. Duggan (2002) coined the term ‘new homonormativity’ to portray the political trajectory of the gay liberation movement and the neoliberal regime, which eventually decenters the LGBTQ+ movement from the left politics to a ‘third-way’ politic. After the popularization of the term, scholars subsequently apply the concept to signpost the internal cultural schism within the community. According to these studies, non-conforming gay men are marginalized under the homonormative regulation. In this article, I suggest that this application of homonormativity on gay cultural politics might not be able to fully capture the complex power relations within the gay community. Consequently, I propose an alternative conceptual framework called ‘hegemonic homosexuality’. Exemplified the semi-structured interviews conducted with 21 Hong Kong Grindr users, I demonstrate the application of the proposed framework and illustrate three principles – (1) tacit consent, (2) dialectic power relations, and (3) multiple hegemonies – that are embedded in the tension among the Grindr users. Instead of portraying an all-powerful, omnipresent normative institution, this framework aims to subject gay men to relativity, highlighting their potential to subvert the oppression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.