Two parallel pilot experiments were performed at Kurivody (Czech Republic) in order to compare two reductive remedial technologies for chlorinated ethenes - microbial dehalogenation assisted by lactate and chemical dehalogenation with zero-valent iron (nZVI) nanoparticles. The methods were applied at a site contaminated by tetrachlorethylene (PCE) and trichlorethylene (TCE), with total concentrations from 10 to 50 mg/l. Concentrations of chlorinated ethenes, inorganic components of interest, pH and oxidation reduction potential (ORP) were monitored at the site for a period up to 650 days. The method of biological reductive dechlorination supported by lactate showed a considerable removal of PCE and TCE, but temporary accumulation of transient reaction product 1,2-cis-dihloroethene. Reductive dechlorination with nZVI showed a significant reduction in the concentration of chlorinated ethenes without a formation of intermediate products. The development of pH showed only small changes due to the high buffering capacity of the aquifer. Both methods differ in the initial development of ORP, but over the long term showed similar values around 100 mV. Significant differences were observed for chemical oxygen demand, where groundwater after the application of nZVI showed no change in comparison to the application of lactate. The reductive effects of both agents were verified by changes in inorganic compound concentrations.
This article deals with combined abio-bioreductive methods for in-situ removal of chlorinated ethenes. The method is based on the use of bioremediation supported by lactate and chemical reduction using nZVI. The method is compared with the use of the individual methods alone, mainly with nZVI. In an environment with very low permeability a poor contaminant removal efficiency was achieved during repeated application of nZVI (about 50% of the original content of contamination). Separate application of lactate resulted in conversion of PCE to 1,2-cis-DCE, whose degradation occurred very slowly. When using the combined abio-bioreductive method, based on consecutive application of lactates and nZVI, over 75% of the original content of contamination was removed. This article discusses not only the changes in concentrations of contaminants but also pH and ORP. Both methods are also compared from an economic point of view.
It is known that the reductive effects of zero-valent iron ( Fe 0) and the sorptive capability of iron and its oxides can be used for both the dehalogenation of chlorinated hydrocarbons (CHC), especially of chlorinated ethenes (PCE → TCE → DCE → VC → ethene, ethane), and the removing of heavy metals from groundwater by turning them into a less-soluble form through changes of their oxidation state, or by adsorption. These consequences are being exploited in the construction of iron filling permeable reactive barriers for a longer time.1 The advantages of nanoscale zero-valent iron ( nanoFe 0) over the macroscopic one consist not only in the better reactivity implicit in their greater specific surface area but also in their mobility in rock environment.2,3 Numerous laboratory experiments, especially the batch-agitated experiments, with samples from seven various contaminated localities in Europe have been carried out with the aim to discover the measurement of the reductive effect of the nanoFe 0 on selected contaminants. It was found that the nanoFe 0 can be reliably usable as a reductive reactant for in-situ chemical decontamination of sites polluted by chlorinated ethenes (CEs), or hexa-valent chromium ( Cr VI ). The rate of reductive reaction and the optimal concentrations for the real remediation action were determined. On the basis of these laboratory experiments, the methods for pilot application of nanoFe 0 have been specified. Subsequently the pilot experiments were accomplished in surveyed localities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.