Background & Aims Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) reduce weight and improve glucose metabolism in obese patients, although it is not clear if metabolic changes are independent of weight loss. We investigated alterations in glucose metabolism in rats following RYGB or VSG. Methods Rats underwent RYGB or VSG and were compared to sham-operated rats that were fed ad lib or pair-fed with animals that received RYGB. Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity tests were performed to assess glycemic function, independent of the incretin response. A hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp was used to compare tissue-specific changes in insulin sensitivity following each procedure. A mixed-meal tolerance tests was used to assess the effect of each surgery on post-prandial release of GLP-1(7–36) and glucose tolerance, and were also performed in rats given the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin9–39. Results Following RYGB or VSG, glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity improved, in proportion to weight loss. Hepatic insulin sensitivity was significantly better in rats that received RYGB or VSG, compared with rats fed ad lib or pair-fed, whereas glucose clearance was similar in all groups. During the mixed-meal tolerance test, plasma levels of GLP-1(7–36) and insulin were greatly and comparably increased in rats that received RYGB and VSG, compared with those that were pair-fed or fed ad lib. Administration of a GLP-1 receptor antagonist prevented improvements in glucose and insulin responses after a meal among rats that received RYGB or VSG. Conclusion In obese rats, VSG is as effective as RYGB at increasing secretion of GLP-1 and insulin secretion and at improving hepatic sensitivity to insulin; these effects are independent of weight loss.

Aims/hypothesis Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) reduces appetite and energy intake in humans, whereas the other incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), seems to have no effect on eating behaviour. Interestingly, studies in rodents have shown that concomitant activation of GIP and GLP-1 receptors may potentiate the satiety-promoting effect of GLP-1, and a novel dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist was recently shown to trigger greater weight losses compared with a GLP-1 receptor agonist in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to delineate the effects of combined GIP and GLP-1 receptor activation on energy intake, appetite and resting energy expenditure in humans. Methods We examined 17 overweight/obese men in a crossover design with 5 study days. On day 1, a 50 g OGTT was performed; on the following 4 study days, the men received an isoglycaemic i.v. glucose infusion (IIGI) plus saline (154 mmol/l NaCl; placebo), GIP (4 pmol kg −1 min −1), GLP-1 (1 pmol kg −1 min −1) or GIP+GLP-1 (4 and 1 pmol kg −1 min −1 , respectively). All IIGIs were performed in a randomised order blinded for the participant and the investigators. The primary endpoint was energy intake as measured by an ad libitum meal after 240 min. Secondary endpoints included appetite ratings and resting energy expenditure, as well as insulin, C-peptide and glucagon responses. Results Energy intake was significantly reduced during IIGI+GLP-1 compared with IIGI+saline infusion (2715 ± 409 vs 4483 ± 568 kJ [mean ± SEM, n = 17], p = 0.014), whereas there were no significant differences in energy intake during IIGI+GIP (4062 ± 520 kJ) or IIGI+GIP+GLP-1 (3875 ± 451 kJ) infusion compared with IIGI+saline (p = 0.590 and p = 0.364, respectively). Energy intake was higher during IIGI+GIP+GLP-1 compared with IIGI+GLP-1 infusion (p = 0.039). Conclusions/interpretation While GLP-1 infusion lowered energy intake in overweight/obese men, simultaneous GIP infusion did not potentiate this GLP-1-mediated effect. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02598791 Funding This study was supported by grants from the Innovation Fund Denmark and the Vissing Foundation.

The novel GLP-1-gastrin dual agonist, ZP3022, improved glycaemic control in db/db mice, and pancreatic islet and β-cell mass increased significantly following treatment with ZP3022 compared with vehicle.

Aim: To investigate the effects of the novel glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) analogue, ZP4165, on body weight and glycaemic control in rodents, and to investigate if ZP4165 modulates the anti-obesity and anti-hyperglycaemic effects of a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist (liraglutide). Methods:The acute insulinotropic effect of ZP4165 was investigated in rats during an oral glucose tolerance test. The long-term effects of ZP4165 on body weight and glycaemic control, either alone or in combination with liraglutide, were assessed in diet-induced obese mice and diabetic db/db mice.Results: ZP4165 showed insulinotropic action in rats. The GIP analogue did not alter the body weight of obese mice but enhanced GLP-1-induced weight loss. In diabetic mice, 4 weeks' dosing with ZP4165 reduced glycated haemoglobin levels vs vehicle by an extent similar to the GLP-1 agonist.Conclusions: ZP4165 potentiated the anti-obesity effect of a GLP-1 agonist in obese mice and improved glycaemic control in diabetic mice. These studies support further investigation of dual-incretin therapy as a more effective treatment option than mono GLP-1 medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity.

Bariatric surgery is the most efficacious procedure for eliciting weight loss in humans, and many patients undergoing the procedure experience significant lessening of their symptoms of type-2 diabetes in addition to losing weight. We have adapted two bariatric surgical procedures commonly employed in humans to a rat model to begin to understand the mechanisms underlying the improvements in energy homeostasis. Young adult male rats received either roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and were assessed for body weight, food intake and parameters of glucose homeostasis over a 28-week period. Control rats received either a sham surgical procedure or else were unoperated. RYGB and VSG had comparable beneficial effects relative to controls. They ate less food and lost more weight, and they both had improved glucose parameters. The most intriguing aspect of the findings is that the two surgical procedures had such similar effects in spite of quite different rearrangements of the gastrointestinal system.