Research into new anticoagulants for preventing and treating thromboembolic disorders has focused on targeting single enzymes in the coagulation cascade, particularly Factor Xa and thrombin, inhibition of which greatly decreases thrombin generation. Based on the results of phase III clinical trials, rivaroxaban, a direct Factor Xa inhibitor, has been approved in many countries for the management of several thromboembolic disorders. Owing to its predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, fixed-dose regimens are used without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. In situations where assessment of rivaroxaban exposure may be helpful, anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays (in tandem with standard calibration curves generated with the use of rivaroxaban calibrators and controls) could be used. It is important to note that test results will be affected by the timing of blood sampling after rivaroxaban intake. In addition, the anti-Factor Xa method measures the drug concentration and not the intensity of the drug’s anticoagulant activity, and a higher than expected rivaroxaban plasma level does not necessarily indicate an increased risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, clinicians need to consider test results in relation to the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban and other patient risk factors associated with bleeding.

No abstract

No abstract

Abstract-The present study was designed to analyze the thrombomodulin proximal promoter region spanning nucleotides Ϫ293 to Ϫ12 to search for polymorphisms that could modify thrombomodulin gene expression in patients with venous thromboembolic disease. The study population comprised 205 patients and 394 healthy subjects of similar age and sex distribution. No polymorphisms and only 1 point mutation (G-33A) were found. The G-33A mutation was present at the heterozygous state in 2 patients and in 1 control. Being more frequent in the patients (0.97%) than in the controls (0.25%), the G-33A mutation might be a risk factor for venous thrombosis. To investigate the effect of this mutation on the thrombomodulin promoter activity, the proximal promoter region of the gene (bearing or not bearing the G-33A mutation) was inserted into a promotorless expression vector, upstream of the firefly luciferase gene, and transiently transfected into EA.hy926 endothelial cells. Under the conditions of the assay, the G-33A mutation mildly decreased the promoter activity. This study confirms that abnormalities of the thrombomodulin proximal promoter are not frequent in patients with venous thromboembolism.

No routine coagulation laboratory test is recommended during rivaroxaban or dabigatran treatment. However measuring drug concentration and/or anticoagulant activity can be desirable in some special clinical settings, such as bleeding, thrombosis recurrence or emergency surgery. The effects of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban on various coagulation assays have been previously studied in normal plasma spiked with increasing concentrations of the drug. In contrast, few data are available in routinely treated patients. In order to perform and to interpret the results of these tests, it is necessary to determine the usual responses of patient's plasma. We have used several coagulation tests in a prospective study including 106 patients receiving thromboprophylactic treatment with dabigatran 150 or 220 mg od and rivaroxaban 10 mg od for major orthopaedic surgery. The most common tests--prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)--give results, which vary according to the reagent used. To overcome this limitation, we advocate the use of plasma calibrators, which decreases the inter-laboratory heterogeneity of results. Anti-Xa measurement and Hemoclot, a thrombin diluted clotting assay, are specific assays which have been proposed for rivaroxaban and dabigatran respectively. These tests, conventional PT, aPTT and thrombin generation (TG) have been performed. We demonstrated that measurements of both drugs can determine reliably the drug concentration in patients' plasmas. PT is more prolonged with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran. Interestingly, the pattern of TG was clearly different in relation to the difference in the mechanism of action of the two new anticoagulants. A significant inter-individual variability of response is detected. Rivaroxaban--mean Cmax 140 ng/mL (extremes 0-412) induces a greater increase of PT than dabigatran. aPTT is sensitive to dabigatran. Rivaroxaban concentrations were in good agreement with two other studies while unexplained lower than expected concentrations were found in dabigatran patients receiving 220 mg once a day [mean Cmax 60 ng/mL (extremes 0-320)]. An interference by pantoprazole, a drug which reduces dabigatran absorption, could explain the observed lower than expected results.

Background Rivaroxaban is widely used in clinical practice. Although routine coagulation monitoring is not required, quantitative determination of rivaroxaban might be valuable in certain clinical circumstances. Variation in response sensitivity of prothrombin time (PT) reagents to rivaroxaban is well described in the literature, and the conventional international normalised ratio cannot be used for rivaroxaban. Purpose This multicentre study assessed the intra and interlaboratory precision of measurements of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations using the PT assay together with rivaroxaban calibrators and controls. Materials and methods Participating laboratories (Europe and North America) were provided with rivaroxaban calibrators (0, 41, 219 and 430 ng/ml), rivaroxaban pooled human plasma controls (19, 160 and 643 ng/ml) and PT reagent. Evaluation was performed over 10 consecutive days by each laboratory using local PT reagents as well as the centrally provided PT reagent (STA Neoplastine CI Plus; Diagnostica Stago). A calibration curve was produced each day, and day-to-day precision was evaluated by testing three control plasma samples. The control was diluted and re-tested if the level was above the highest concentration of the calibration curve. Results Intralaboratory variations in PT were dependent on the sensitivity of the local PT reagents, regardless of the type of instrument used. A large inter-laboratory variation (in seconds) was observed with local PT reagents; the coefficient of variation (CV) was 13.6–29.7%. When the results were expressed as rivaroxaban concentration (ng/ml), the inter-reagent variations were reduced; less variation was found with both local reagents (CV: 5.1–15.5%) and the central reagent (CV: 2.2–7.5%). However, over-estimation was observed with both local and central reagents. The CV for the calibrator containing 41 ng/ml rivaroxaban was 5.8% when the central reagent was used. Conclusions The PT assay may be useful for measuring rivaroxaban peak plasma concentrations (2–3 h after drug intake) using rivaroxaban calibrators and controls.

Abstract-We analyzed the distal promoter region of the thrombomodulin (TM) gene (nucleotides Ϫ300 to Ϫ2052) in subjects from the Paris Thrombosis Study (PATHROS), a French case-control study of venous thrombosis, to identify polymorphisms that might modify TM gene expression. Eight novel mutations were found in the 40 DNA samples initially screened. Two of these mutations (Ϫ1748G/C and Ϫ1208/Ϫ1209 del TT) were frequent. One rare transition (Ϫ1166G/A) might have functional consequences owing to its position. These 3 mutations were screened for in the entire study population of 327 patients and 398 controls. None of the 3 was significantly associated with thrombosis. Interestingly, the Ϫ1208/Ϫ1209 TT deletion was associated with varicose veins in the patients. This mutation was in tight linkage disequilibrium with the ϩ1418 C/T change in the coding sequence, a known polymorphism that predicts an

Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Routine coagulation monitoring is not required, but a quantitative determination of rivaroxaban concentrations might be useful in some clinical circumstances. This multicentre study assessed the suitability of the anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay for the measurement of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations (ng/ml) using rivaroxaban calibrators and controls, and the inter-laboratory precision of the measurement. Twenty-four centres in Europe and North America were provided with sets of rivaroxaban calibrators (0, 41, 209 and 422 ng/ml) and a set of rivaroxaban pooled human plasma controls (20, 199 and 662 ng/ml; the concentrations were unknown to the participating laboratories). The evaluation was carried out over 10 days by each laboratory using local anti-factor Xa reagents as well as the centrally provided reagent, a modified STA® Rotachrom® assay. A calibration curve was produced each day, and the day-to-day precision was evaluated by testing three human plasma controls. When using the local anti-factor Xa reagents, the mean rivaroxaban concentrations (measured/actual values) were: 17/20, 205/199 and 668/662 ng/ml, and the coefficient of variance (CV) was 37.0%, 13.7% and 14.1%, respectively. When the modified STA Rotachrom method was used, the measured/actual values were: 18/20, 199/199 and 656/662 ng/ml, and the CV was 19.1%, 10.9% and 10.0%, respectively. The results suggest that, by using rivaroxaban calibrators and controls, the anti-factor Xa chromogenic method is suitable for measuring a wide range of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations (20-660 ng/ml), which covers the expected rivaroxaban plasma levels after therapeutic doses.