Increasing flood damage has led to a rising importance of land use in flood risk management policies, commonly referred to as the spatial turn in flood risk management. This includes policies aiming at making space for rivers, which, in practice, lead to an increasing demand for land. Although research has been conducted on the variety of policies, the resulting land use conflicts in flood-prone areas have not been paid much attention to. This paper therefore analyses the current land use and its changes in Alpine flood-prone areas in Austria. The results show that space for rivers has been decreasing due to human activities (e.g., river straightening and channel narrowing) since the middle of the 19th century, and settlements have been expanding into flood-prone areas. Furthermore, the share of valuable agricultural land (which is important for food production) located in flood hazard zones is higher in more mountainous areas. Given the limited space for permanent settlement in Alpine regions, these land use changes exert pressure on the availability of land suitable for flood risk management. Therefore, making space for rivers as part of flood risk management policies faces considerable restrictions in Alpine areas.
The paradigmatic shift from traditional flood defense toward integrated flood risk management has widened the sectors and policies affected and has spurred a growing interest of scholars to understand cross-sectoral flood policy integration. In this paper we argue that the cross-sectoral goal relationship—ranging from complementary to conflictual policy goals—is a useful conceptual framework to understand (1) the policy integration challenge at hands and (2) in particular the unfolding policy integration from a processual perspective. For our empirical analysis we identify three policy subsystems that are highly important for sectoral interplay in flood risk management: agriculture, hydropower generation, and spatial planning. Using Austria as a case study we illustrate the goal relationships and sectoral policy integration challenges in each of these fields of interaction. Based on 45 expert interviews in the selected policy sectors we provide useful insights into the current processes of flood policy integration. The empirical findings from our case studies show that sectoral goal relationships and the nature of the policy integration challenge drive flood policy integration. More pronounced land use conflicts are more strongly reflected in different actor interests, policy frames, policy goals, and the choice of policy instruments. Sectoral goal relationships are an important factor to explain the unfolding policy integration process. Complementary policy goals result in rather informal, harmonious integrative negotiations on strengthening synergies by using soft policy instruments. On the contrary, conflictual policy goals lead to more formal negotiations among the affected sectors relying on hard, regulative instruments.
Mountain hazards such as floods, torrents or landslides pose a serious threat to human lives and repeatedly cause considerable damage in the Alpine region. Shrinking populations also provide a socio-political challenge for regional and local authorities. Within the ÖAW-ESS funded DemoHazAlps project, the aim is to develop a better understanding of demographic change as a key driver in transforming risk patterns. A transdisciplinary research strategy was chosen to address these challenges in the Gailtal, in the Austrian province of Carinthia. This paper describes the use of transdisciplinary research above all to integrate the knowledge of those who are affected by, and those who can affect the planning of, risk management. Transdisciplinary research has a high potential to contribute to overcoming conflicts in flood risk management triggered by, and linked to, demographic change. However, in practice there are many limitations and barriers to consider, such as the negative connotations of risk management or a pandemic. This paper provides some critical reflection on transdisciplinary research to address limitations and barriers; the lessons learnt could be applied in similar situations, for example within UNESCO biosphere reserves.
Mountain hazards such as floods, torrents or landslides pose a serious threat to human lives and repeatedly cause considerable damage in the Alpine region. Shrinking populations also provide a socio-political challenge for regional and local authorities. Within the ÖAW-ESS funded DemoHazAlps project, the aim is to develop a better understanding of demographic change as a key driver in transforming risk patterns. A transdisciplinary research strategy was chosen to address these challenges in the Gailtal, in the Austrian province of Carinthia. This paper describes the use of transdisciplinary research above all to integrate the knowledge of those who are affected by, and those who can affect the planning of, risk management. Transdisciplinary research has a high potential to contribute to overcoming conflicts in flood risk management triggered by, and linked to, demographic change. However, in practice there are many limitations and barriers to consider, such as the negative connotations of risk management or a pandemic. This paper provides some critical reflection on transdisciplinary research to address limitations and barriers; the lessons learnt could be applied in similar situations, for example within UNESCO biosphere reserves.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.