No abstract

The conventional technique for cochlear implantation is via a mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy. An alternative approach for cochlear implantation is hereto described. The middle ear is entered through a suprameatal approach (SMA) bypassing the mastoid cavity. This surgical approach shortens the duration of the procedure to approximately one hour. The introduction of the cochlear implant electrode array involves drilling in the suprameatal region and the osseous portion of the external auditory canal at a safe distance from the anatomical position of the facial nerve. This prevents possible injury by direct trauma or drill overheating of the chorda tympani or facial nerves. We report 15 consecutive patients who were operated on using the SMA technique. No complications were encountered as a result of this surgical technique but further experience may be necessary.

The suprameatal approach is an alternative method for performing cochlear implantation developed in the Sheba Medical Center in 1999. This technique eliminates the need for mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy. The middle ear is entered through a retroauricular tympanotomy flap, and the electrode is introduced into the cochlea via a tunnel drilled in the suprameatal region superior to Henle's spine. The suprameatal approach is a simple and safe technique that does not endanger the facial nerve nor the chorda tympani. A wide exposure of the promontory enables exact determination of scala tympani and smooth introduction of the electrodes into the cochlea. This technique may also be used in malformed or ossified cochlea. Until now 140 patients were operated in our department and an additional 48 patients were operated on in the department of Otorhinolaryngology at the University of Vienna employing the suprameatal approach technique.

Meningitis was the commonest complication (46.4%), followed by brain abscess, epidural abscess, sigmoid sinus thrombosis, subdural empyema, perisinus abscess and transverse and cavernous sinus thrombosis. Twelve patients (42.9%) had received antibiotic treatment prior to admission. Chronic otitis media, cholesteatoma and brain abscess were diagnosed mainly in adults, while acute otitis media and epidural abscess were more frequent in children. Twenty-one patients underwent mastoidectomy to eradicate the source of infection. The commonest finding at surgery was granulations (81%). Cholesteatoma was seen in 38.1% of cases. Cholesteatoma and brain abscess were usually associated with Gram-negative bacterial infection. Meningitis, however, was caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in 40% of cases. CT showed a sensitivity of 92.75% for diagnosing otogenic ICC. There was no mortality. The morbidity rate was high (71.4%) and included hearing impairment, hemiparesis, hydrocephalus, mental retardation, polyneuropathy and epilepsy.

Our preliminary results indicate that the minimally invasive endoscopic ear surgery allowed complete eradication of cholesteatoma from the middle ear and its extensions, with minimal morbidity and good functional results.

Despite the decline in listening habits and in the enjoyment of music after cochlear implantation, most patients do listen to music. The changes in listening habits and enjoyment were not related to the selected background variables.

The aim of this study was to analyze the causes for revision procedures, surgical findings and audiological outcome in reoperated cochlear implant patients. The medical records of 45 patients were reviewed retrospectively for age at the time of implantation, the implant was used for initial and revision surgeries, the duration of implant use before revision, surgical findings, and postoperative audiological results. Generally, children were reoperated more often than adults (12.5 vs. 6.9%) and, with one exception of improper electrode insertion, there were no major post-revision complications. Device failure (DF) was the main cause for revision surgery (23/45) followed by wound/flap problems, magnet/receiver-stimulator displacement, foreign body/allergic reaction, subperiosteal abscess, misplaced electrode, intractable vertigo, cholesteatoma and extrusion of the positioner. No significant difference was found in the rate of DF between children and adults for each implant separately (P = 0.289 for Nucleus 22, P = 0.355 for Nucleus 24, P = 0.683 for Clarion and P = 1.0 for Med-El). The failure rates of different implants did not differed significantly among adults. DF in the Clarion group was significantly higher compared to the Nucleus and Med-El combined for pediatric patients (P = 0.0218) and all CI recipients (adults + children; P = 0.0055). The post-revision audiological benefit was unchanged or improved compared to the initial implantation values in all reimplanted patients and was not influenced by minor surgical procedures (wound revision, drainage of any collection, magnet replacement, or relocation of receiver-stimulator). Since DF was found to be the most common cause for reoperation, improving device technology could prevent the vast majority of revision procedures.

Our study was designed to evaluate the complication rate of cochlear implantation (CI) and to compare two different surgical approaches that are currently being used for implantations in our department. This retrospective study was conducted on the patients who underwent CI in our center between 1989 and 2003 and who were followed-up for at least 18 months. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique that had been used for the implantation: the mastoidectomy with posterior tympanotomy approach and the suprameatal approach (without mastoidectomy). The incidence of complications following CI was compared between the two groups and between children and adults. Facial nerve paralysis, electrode misplacement, injury to the chorda tympani nerve and mastoiditis occurred only in the mastoidectomy with posterior tympanotomy approach group. Acute middle ear infection with or without mastoiditis emerged as the most common complication in both groups, followed by vestibular and wound problems. Disequilibrium was significantly more common among the adults than among the children (p < 0.0001). The suprameatal approach was demonstrated as being a good alternative technique to the classical surgery for CI.