No abstract
While it is recognized that vegetation plays a significant role in stream bank stabilization, the effects are not fully quantified. The study goal was to determine the type and density of vegetation that provides the greatest protection against stream bank erosion by determining the density of roots in stream banks. To quantify the density of roots along alluvial stream banks, 25 field sites in the Appalachian Mountains were sampled. The riparian buffers varied from short turfgrass to mature riparian forests, representing a range of vegetation types. Root length density (RLD) with depth and aboveground vegetation density were measured. The sites were divided into forested and herbaceous groups and differences in root density were evaluated. At the herbaceous sites, very fine roots (diameter < 0.5 mm) were most common and more than 75% of all roots were concentrated in the upper 30 cm of the stream bank. Under forested vegetation, fine roots (0.5 mm < diameter < 2.0 mm) were more common throughout the bank profile, with 55% of all roots in the top 30 cm. In the top 30 cm of the bank, herbaceous sites had significantly greater overall RLD than forested sites (alpha = 0.01). While there were no significant differences in total RLD below 30 cm, forested sites had significantly greater concentrations of fine roots, as compared with herbaceous sites (alpha = 0.01). As research has shown that erosion resistance has a direct relationship with fine root density, forested vegetation may provide better protection against stream bank erosion.
In the fall of 1986, the Offshore Operators Committee conducted a survey on spotting fluid use by member companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico. The purpose of the survey was to compare diesel and purpose of the survey was to compare diesel and mineral oil spotting fluids for effectiveness in freeing stuck drillpipe. The survey covered the years, 1983 - 1986. Operators were asked to specify the number of wells drilled with water base mud for each year covered by the survey (1983 - 1986) and to supply certain information on each stuck pipe event where an oil base spotting fluid was used. The results showed that the success rate for freeing stuck pipe with diesel pills was 51%, while the success rate with mineral oil pills was 33%. Introduction In recent years a substantial data base on the toxicity of drilling muds has been developed by both government and industry. These data show that water base muds containing mineral oils are normally less toxic than muds containing diesel oils at the same oil content. Whether or not this difference in toxicity has any significance from an environmental standpoint is still under debate. Nonetheless, EPA has sought to reduce 3 or eliminate the use of diesel in drilling muds and encouraged the use of less toxic mineral oils. Traditionally, diesel has had two principal uses in drilling muds: as a lubricant to reduce friction and as a "spotting" fluid to free stuck drillpipe. In this latter application, a volume or "pill" of oil base mud is pumped downhole and placed or "spotted" in the annulus opposite the point where the drillstring is stuck. After a few hours., the filter cake bonding the pipe to the formation is weakened and the pipe is pulled free. While mineral oil is considered to be a satisfactory lubricant, most operators consider diesel to be superior for freeing stuck pipe. In the fall of 1986, the Offshore Operators Committee (OOC) conducted a comprehensive survey to test this hypothesis. SURVEY APPROACH The survey covered Gulf of Mexico drilling activities for the years 1983 - 1986. Operators were asked to specify the number of wells drilled with water base mud for each year covered by the survey and to supply certain information on each stuck pipe event where an oil based spotting fluid was used. The survey asked for the date the event took place, the type of oil used in the pill, the depth where the pipe was stuck, the time interval from when sticking occurred until when the pill was spotted, whether the hole was straight or directional, and whether or not the pill was successful in freeing the pipe. Survey responses were received from 12 companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico. These 12 companies accounted for well over half the wells drilled during the survey years. DATA ANALYSIS The survey participants reported 619 spotting incidents during the survey years; however, not all of these incidents were used in this analysis. Forty five incidents took place in 1981 and 1982. These incidents plus four in the 1983–86 survey period were not used because accompanying information on the number of wells drilled with water base mud was missing. In two cases information on whether or not the pill was successful was missing. Multiple pills were used in 40 spotting incidents that occurred during the survey period. We chose to base our calculations on sticking incidents with the results categorized by the nature of the first pill, rather than on spotting incidents. For example, assume an operator had a sticking event and spotted a diesel pill. Also assume he failed to get free and spotted pill. Also assume he failed to get free and spotted a second pill. P. 517
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.