Abstract. The recent warming in the Arctic is affecting a broad spectrum of physical, ecological, and human/cultural systems that may be irreversible on century time scales and have the potential to cause rapid changes in the earth system. The response of the carbon cycle of the Arctic to changes in climate is a major issue of global concern, yet there has not been a comprehensive review of the status of the contemporary carbon cycle of the Arctic and its response to climate change. This review is designed to clarify key uncertainties and vulnerabilities in the response of the carbon cycle of the Arctic to ongoing climatic change. While it is clear that there are substantial stocks of carbon in the Arctic, there are also significant uncertainties associated with the magnitude of organic matter stocks contained in permafrost and the storage of methane hydrates beneath both subterranean and submerged permafrost of the Arctic. In the context of the global carbon cycle, this review demonstrates that the Arctic plays an important role in the global dynamics of both CO 2 and CH 4 . Studies suggest that the Arctic has been a sink for atmospheric CO 2 of between 0 and 0.8 Pg C/yr in recent decades, which is between 0% and 25% of the global net land/ocean flux during the 1990s. The Arctic is a substantial source of CH 4 to the atmosphere (between 32 and 112 Tg CH 4 /yr), primarily because of the large area of wetlands throughout the region. Analyses to date indicate that the sensitivity of the carbon cycle of the Arctic during the remainder of the 21st century is highly uncertain. To improve the capability to assess the sensitivity of the carbon cycle of the Arctic to projected climate change, we recommend that (1) integrated regional studies be conducted to link observations of carbon dynamics to the processes that are likely to influence those dynamics, and (2) the understanding gained from these integrated studies be incorporated into both uncoupled and fully coupled carbon-climate modeling efforts.
Fresh water from summer ice melt and the total freshwater content of the Arctic Ocean water column above the thermocline are estimated from vertical profiles of temperature and salinity observed on the I/B Oden 1991 cruise. The seasonal ice melt ranges from 0.5 m to slightly above 1 m and is moderately uniform over the observation area. Regions of lower melting are seen over the Morris Jesup Plateau. The freshwater content is calculated relative to the salinity just above the thermocline north of the Barents Sea. The freshwater content increases toward the interior of the Arctic Ocean, showing that fresh water is advected from other regions into the observation area. Regions of different freshwater content are separated by fronts over the Nansen‐Gakkel Ridge, over the Lomonosov Ridge, and in the western Eurasian Basin between waters derived from the Eurasian and Canadian Basins. Denser water, homogenized north of the Barents Sea, is recognized by a temperature minimum layer. The absence of the temperature minimum near the Nansen‐Gakkel Ridge indicates that heat is transferred from the Atlantic Layer over a longer time than the shortest route would allow. This observation can be explained if the layer circulates together with the Atlantic Layer, i.e., toward the east, and returns above the Nansen‐Gakkel Ridge and along the Amundsen Basin. North of the Laptev Sea, this water formed north of the Barents Sea becomes covered by low‐salinity shelf water. The increased freshwater content limits the winter convection, so it no longer reaches the thermocline and an intermediate halocline is formed. The halocline in the Eurasian Basin consists of water originating from winter convection in the Arctic Ocean north of the Barents Sea, which then circulates around the basin. Such a formation mechanism also explains the observed distribution of low NO water. The strong density increase limits vertical exchange, and the vertical diffusion coefficient in the halocline is small (∼1 × 10−6 m2 s−1). The increased temperature of the halocline shows that the heat lost upward by the Atlantic Layer, mainly by double‐diffusive convection, is trapped below the mixed layer.
Profiles of chemical constituents in seawater above the Alpha Ridge in the central Arctic Ocean obtained during the Canadian Expedition to Study the Alpha Ridge (CESAR) support a model in which the halocline is maintained by dense, saline water produced on the continental shelves within the Arctic Ocean by the formation of sea ice. It is argued that nutrient regeneration on the continental shelves largely accounts for the nutrient maximum that has been observed in the upper halocline over a wide region of the Arctic Ocean, and that while the Bering Sea and North Altantic can be recognized as origins of halocline water, water masses from these regions undergo sufficient changes in their chemical properties within the Arctic Ocean significant that they no longer retain their identity in the halocline.
In the Arctic Ocean, Pacific source water can be distinguished from Atlantic source water by nitrate‐phosphate concentration relationships, with Pacific water having higher phosphate concentrations relative to those of nitrate. Furthermore, Pacific water, originally from the inflow through Bering Strait, is clearly recognizable in the outflows of low‐salinity waters from the Arctic Ocean to the northern North Atlantic Ocean through the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and through Fram Strait. In the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, we observe that almost all of the waters flowing through Lancaster and Jones sounds, most of the water in the top 100 m in Smith Sound (containing the flow through Nares Strait), and possibly all waters in Hudson Bay contain no water of Atlantic origin. Significant amounts of Pacific water are also observed along the western coast of Baffin Bay, along the coast of Labrador, and above the 200‐m isobath of the Grand Banks. There is a clear signal of Pacific water flowing south through Fram Strait and along the east coast of Greenland extending at least as far south as Denmark Strait. Pacific water signature can be seen near the east coast of Greenland at 66°N, but not in data at 60°N. Temporal variability in the concentrations of Pacific water has been observed at several locations where multiple‐year observations are available.
[1] The Arctic Ocean constitutes a large body of water that is still relatively poorly surveyed because of logistical difficulties, although the importance of the Arctic Ocean for global circulation and climate is widely recognized. For instance, the concentration and inventory of anthropogenic CO 2 (C ant ) in the Arctic Ocean are not properly known despite its relatively large volume of well-ventilated waters. In this work, we have synthesized available transient tracer measurements (e.g., CFCs and SF 6 ) made during more than two decades by the authors. The tracer data are used to estimate the ventilation of the Arctic Ocean, to infer deep-water pathways, and to estimate the Arctic Ocean inventory of C ant . For these calculations, we used the transit time distribution (TTD) concept that makes tracer measurements collected over several decades comparable with each other. The bottom water in the Arctic Ocean has CFC values close to the detection limit, with somewhat higher values in the Eurasian Basin. The ventilation time for the intermediate water column is shorter in the Eurasian Basin ($200 years) than in the Canadian Basin ($300 years). We calculate the Arctic Ocean C ant inventory range to be 2.5 to 3.3 Pg-C, normalized to 2005, i.e., $2% of the global ocean C ant inventory despite being composed of only $1% of the global ocean volume. In a similar fashion, we use the TTD field to calculate the Arctic Ocean inventory of CFC-11 to be 26.2 ± 2.6 Â 10 6 moles for year 1994, which is $5% of the global ocean CFC-11 inventory.
[1] Climate change is expected to have a strong effect on the Eastern Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS) region, which includes 40% of the Arctic shelves and comprises the Laptev and East Siberian seas. The largest organic carbon pool, the dissolved organic carbon (DOC), may change significantly due to changes in both riverine inputs and transformation rates; however, the present DOC inventories and transformation patterns are poorly understood. Using samples from the International Siberian Shelf Study 2008, this study examines for the first time DOC removal in Arctic shelf waters with residence times that range from months to years. Removals of up to 10%-20% were found in the Lena River estuary, consistent with earlier studies in this area, where surface waters were shown to have a residence time of approximately 2 months. In contrast, the DOC concentrations showed a strong nonconservative pattern in areas with freshwater residence times of several years. The average losses of DOC were estimated to be 30%-50% during mixing along the shelf, corresponding to a first-order removal rate constant of 0.3 yr −1 . These data provide the first observational evidence for losses of DOC in the Arctic shelf seas, and the calculated DOC deficit reflects DOC losses that are higher than recent model estimates for the region. Overall, a large proportion of riverine DOC is removed from the surface waters across the Arctic shelves. Such significant losses must be included in models of the carbon cycle for the Arctic Ocean, especially since the breakdown of terrestrial DOC to CO 2 in Arctic shelf seas may constitute a positive feedback mechanism for Arctic climate warming. These data also provide a baseline for considering the effects of future changes in carbon fluxes, as the vast northern carbon-rich permafrost areas draining into the Arctic are affected by global warming. Citation: Alling, V., et al. (2010), Nonconservative behavior of dissolved organic carbon across the Laptev and East Siberian seas, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 24, GB4033,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.